‘Independence Day 2 & 3′ Update: Producers Confirm ‘ID Forever’ Title and 3D

Published 3 years ago by

Independence Day 2 and 3 Update Independence Day 2 & 3 Update: Producers Confirm ID Forever Title and 3D

Last we’d heard about Independence Day 2, director Roland Emmerich and producer Dean Devlin were still struggling to find financing, but had a pretty good hold on where they wanted to take the franchise’s next two films. While we still can’t report that any member of the 1996 film’s cast has signed on to the project, or that the project has found its money, we have a very brief update for fans.

Rumors had been circulating for a while that suggested at least one of the Independence Day sequels would be titled ID Forever, and now Devlin has confirmed they will both bare that title. Since, as Devlin reveals, each movie will exist as one part of a larger story, the films have been appropriately titled ID Forever Part One and ID Forever Part Two.

In addition to a somewhat official unveiling of the films’ titles, director Roland Emmerich (2012) provided an update on his approach to the sequel(s). While we’re sure ID Forever will make great use of the special effects technology of today, Emmerich reveals he will not be adopting more modern filmmaking techniques whole cloth. The director confirmed Fox wants ID Forever Parts 1 & 2 to be 3D, but says they will be shot in 2D (presumably on film) and then up-converted.

It’s actually a little disappointing to hear that Emmerich won’t be shooting in 3D since his films are known to feature some truly epic shots of destruction. Though it’s not his only trademark, the director has never failed to deliver at least one awe-inspiring sequence that emphasizes the destructive capabilities of his film’s cataclysmic event (i.e. The White House exploding, Godzilla laying waste to New York, etc).

However, Dean Devlin claims those bombastic sequences aren’t why audiences responded so strongly to Independence Day in the first place. Devlin tells Film Smarts that when looking back on the 1996 film, he discovered that it was the “lovable” relationships between the characters that drew audiences in and made the film compelling.

“The thing that really hit me about the movie is how much love there is in it: between the characters; that the filmmakers had making it; that the cast had for each other. As we’re approaching a sequel we’re focusing on that aspect of it. Because I think that was really the key as to why it worked for everyone. It was lovable.”

Some might argue that getting to see Will Smith punch an alien in the face was certainly a major selling point – but yes, each member of the film’s cast was given plenty of time to shine.

Independence Day White House Explosion Scene Independence Day 2 & 3 Update: Producers Confirm ID Forever Title and 3D

Speaking of the cast – there’s still no word from Devlin or Emmerich on whether or not Will Smith has signed on for the sequel. When news of the IDF first broke, Emmerich claimed Smith was trying to work out the right “package” to satisfy his financial needs, but that was the last we had heard.

Casting is going to be of the utmost importance for these sequels, though, as Devlin reveals it’s been a “tough battle” between the cast and the studio. Bleeding Cool surmises that, based on Devlin’s comments, Fox won’t officially sign off on the sequels unless a vast majority of the cast (read: Will Smith) are on board.

At this point fans have a vague idea of how Devlin and Emmerich plan to approach the two belated sequels – including what they should be titled – but really there isn’t much in the way of progress. Next year audiences will get a chance to re-experience Independence Day in theaters (with the added boost of 3D) – an event that should give Fox a better idea of how casual moviegoers feel about the property some 17 years later.

Independence Day will be re-released in 3D on July 3, 2013.


Source: Film Smarts (via Bleeding Cool, Total Film)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. The invasion in ID4 was flawless. I think alot of invasion movies try to live up to it but fall short. The acting was good. But the story of the characters made the movie B. It just made the movie less believable. I think the sequels will be interesting. But i can do without Will Smith.

    • I agree with Bill. I think that the movie was okay. There were many cliches in the movie that made the movie another ‘America rules everything’ kind of movie. Even as a proud American I feel movies like those are way overdone in Hollywood. I grew up watching them and loving them but I hope they move with the times. There are other countries out ther on earth that can kick ass also. Perhaps when we all work together too. I hope they do a better job at making the story more believable and less mainstream actors that will only degrade the movie in a comical sense.

      • The Canadian Special Forces are a favorite of the American NATO commanders because they succeed so consistently. That makes me proud to be Canadian.

        That said, there is no one on this earth who can “kick ass” like the American Military. The IDF are tough as nails, but small. The other NATO nations are strong, but, even combined, do not equate to the American Military. A military operation without American leadership fails far more often than ones that do. I don’t want an Invasion movie that attempts to portray other countries as having the size, flexibility and competence of the American Armed Forces. Their power projects around the world. The rest of the Planet combined doesn’t equate to it.

  2. The sequels won’t be the same without bill pullman.

  3. Bill Pullman made it hard to watch in the first place…I hear no Will Smith this go around either, I like that.

    • Same stale garbage from hollywoods ass