<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re Smarter Than Hollywood Thinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel f</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-5/#comment-221390</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 04:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-221390</guid>
		<description>And by doing that sikwon you hurt the rest of us. The success of a movie is judged by BO not DVD sales or rentals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And by doing that sikwon you hurt the rest of us. The success of a movie is judged by BO not DVD sales or rentals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sikwon</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-5/#comment-221381</link>
		<dc:creator>sikwon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 04:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-221381</guid>
		<description>the movies are expensive to go to, plus i have kids. for 3 people to see that silly twilight movie cost me 80$. now i have no problem paying for a movie like transformers, im not following the plot super close but the effects are best experienced in the theater. now a movie that im going to think about, to sit and watch and really follow and enjoy for its plot (even a movie like valhalla rising, very good). i dont want to be ingterupted, i dont want chatter, i want to relax, and really follow it. same thing with most comedies, i hate when i miss a joke because people are still laughing at the last one. the theater is for event movies, every thing else i can wait for on demand or dvd (or the dirty lil anti hollywood secret).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the movies are expensive to go to, plus i have kids. for 3 people to see that silly twilight movie cost me 80$. now i have no problem paying for a movie like transformers, im not following the plot super close but the effects are best experienced in the theater. now a movie that im going to think about, to sit and watch and really follow and enjoy for its plot (even a movie like valhalla rising, very good). i dont want to be ingterupted, i dont want chatter, i want to relax, and really follow it. same thing with most comedies, i hate when i miss a joke because people are still laughing at the last one. the theater is for event movies, every thing else i can wait for on demand or dvd (or the dirty lil anti hollywood secret).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: verbatim</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-221257</link>
		<dc:creator>verbatim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-221257</guid>
		<description>Hollywoodies are a bunch of pretentious, elitist, narcissistic, blowhards. If they are so smart, how come they keep making anti-military  films: all of which have been financial failures. Aren&#039;t they supposed to make films that make money? Aren&#039;t they supposed to understand their audiences and produce films their audiences want to see?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywoodies are a bunch of pretentious, elitist, narcissistic, blowhards. If they are so smart, how come they keep making anti-military  films: all of which have been financial failures. Aren&#8217;t they supposed to make films that make money? Aren&#8217;t they supposed to understand their audiences and produce films their audiences want to see?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel f</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220756</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220756</guid>
		<description>So rather than ackknowledge any of my many points you just keep repeating the same post over and over?

1. The argument your making was also said about Gen x and the gen before it. It&#039;s a wash rise repeat cycle as soon as your generation isn&#039;t the newest you start blaming the last generation. It&#039;s nothing new it&#039;s a cycle that&#039;s gone on for decades. People did it to your generation and gen y will do it to the next. People always want to act like the new generation is the problem so they don&#039;t have to take responsibility.

2. Movies are not any worse now than they were in the 80s or 70s but it&#039;s nice to hang on to your fond memories of the past. Let&#039;s please not act like they never made a bad movie before 99 it&#039;s insulting.

3. Movie length on average not any shorter than they were before. Check the lengths most movies are at least 2hours. Not all but most. In fact there are times in history that films were on average a lil shorter than they on now.

4. Despite there so called in ability to pay attention Gen Y seems to flock to long films. TDK was 2 1/2 hours and Lotr was 3 hours each. All were hugly successful. In fact take the highest grossing films from the last 9 years and see how many of them are short you may be surprised. 

Honestly from the younger gen I&#039;ve found a majority of people who are movie nuts and very smart. Remember Gen Y goes all the way back to 83 and I best most of those 25 and 26 year olds have better attention spans than you. I can promise you most of them prefer smart films. Maybe the 13 year olds don&#039;t but I know if we went in to your past we could find you watching crap movies that were short. At 12 most people don&#039;t know much about what makes a film good or bad and we just watch anything. They havnt even developed their taste yet. Much like you though when they grow up they will claim their movies were better than the current ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So rather than ackknowledge any of my many points you just keep repeating the same post over and over?</p>
<p>1. The argument your making was also said about Gen x and the gen before it. It&#8217;s a wash rise repeat cycle as soon as your generation isn&#8217;t the newest you start blaming the last generation. It&#8217;s nothing new it&#8217;s a cycle that&#8217;s gone on for decades. People did it to your generation and gen y will do it to the next. People always want to act like the new generation is the problem so they don&#8217;t have to take responsibility.</p>
<p>2. Movies are not any worse now than they were in the 80s or 70s but it&#8217;s nice to hang on to your fond memories of the past. Let&#8217;s please not act like they never made a bad movie before 99 it&#8217;s insulting.</p>
<p>3. Movie length on average not any shorter than they were before. Check the lengths most movies are at least 2hours. Not all but most. In fact there are times in history that films were on average a lil shorter than they on now.</p>
<p>4. Despite there so called in ability to pay attention Gen Y seems to flock to long films. TDK was 2 1/2 hours and Lotr was 3 hours each. All were hugly successful. In fact take the highest grossing films from the last 9 years and see how many of them are short you may be surprised. </p>
<p>Honestly from the younger gen I&#8217;ve found a majority of people who are movie nuts and very smart. Remember Gen Y goes all the way back to 83 and I best most of those 25 and 26 year olds have better attention spans than you. I can promise you most of them prefer smart films. Maybe the 13 year olds don&#8217;t but I know if we went in to your past we could find you watching crap movies that were short. At 12 most people don&#8217;t know much about what makes a film good or bad and we just watch anything. They havnt even developed their taste yet. Much like you though when they grow up they will claim their movies were better than the current ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220667</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220667</guid>
		<description>@ Daniel f
Another great article: 
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574348493483201758.html

-----

&quot;Yes because kids not paying attention to teachers at a very young age is such a crazy new concept. Gen Y was the first time that ever happened.&quot; ~ Daniel f

-----

When it comes to all generations, what they do at a young age does reflect the future. If we push forward the clock, you will notice psychologists, employers, and many-many other professionals have also noticed the short attention span of Generation Y. Technology starts to affect everyone at a young age, and then it transcends throughout a person&#039;s lifetime.

What does this have to do with movies, and them being dumbed down for consumption? Everything. Who do you think is the demographic of movies such as &quot;Star Trek&quot;, &quot;Stargate&quot;, &quot;X-Men&quot;, and &quot;Star Wars&quot; is trying to capture? 

Second, I am a psychologist who studies, researches, and tests adolescence for different behavioral anomalies. It is my job to notice certain behavior patterns, and how they manifest themselves over a period of time.

Generation Y is suffering greatly from being exposed to a higher than usual set of advancing technologies. As a result of being too consumed with new ways to stay connected, this new generation has formed a short attention span for offline reality. It is the first of many generations that will lack an understanding of normal face to face communication, and how human body language can give insight into a person&#039;s attitude. 

As a result of being too consumed with being consumed with staying connected, they are losing the ability to pay attention in boardrooms, movie theaters, and school for long hours. It has been documented.

I don&#039;t envy this next generation. Even though I do participate in the new technological world, I do not envy what this next generation will be sacrificing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Daniel f<br />
Another great article:<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574348493483201758.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574348493483201758.html</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes because kids not paying attention to teachers at a very young age is such a crazy new concept. Gen Y was the first time that ever happened.&#8221; ~ Daniel f</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>When it comes to all generations, what they do at a young age does reflect the future. If we push forward the clock, you will notice psychologists, employers, and many-many other professionals have also noticed the short attention span of Generation Y. Technology starts to affect everyone at a young age, and then it transcends throughout a person&#8217;s lifetime.</p>
<p>What does this have to do with movies, and them being dumbed down for consumption? Everything. Who do you think is the demographic of movies such as &#8220;Star Trek&#8221;, &#8220;Stargate&#8221;, &#8220;X-Men&#8221;, and &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; is trying to capture? </p>
<p>Second, I am a psychologist who studies, researches, and tests adolescence for different behavioral anomalies. It is my job to notice certain behavior patterns, and how they manifest themselves over a period of time.</p>
<p>Generation Y is suffering greatly from being exposed to a higher than usual set of advancing technologies. As a result of being too consumed with new ways to stay connected, this new generation has formed a short attention span for offline reality. It is the first of many generations that will lack an understanding of normal face to face communication, and how human body language can give insight into a person&#8217;s attitude. </p>
<p>As a result of being too consumed with being consumed with staying connected, they are losing the ability to pay attention in boardrooms, movie theaters, and school for long hours. It has been documented.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t envy this next generation. Even though I do participate in the new technological world, I do not envy what this next generation will be sacrificing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giantevilhead</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220580</link>
		<dc:creator>Giantevilhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 06:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220580</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know. Dumbed down movies do ssem to make more money. James Cameron&#039;s movies are a good example. His movies have gotten progressively dumber but they&#039;ve been making more money. Terminator had an interesting story, a cool paradox, and ended rather ambiguously. Aliens was still very interesting even though the story was more straightforward. Abyss had a more complicated plot but didn&#039;t do very well at the box office. While Terminator 2 was a good movie, it was really dumbed down compared to the first Terminator. They pretty much explained everything to the audience and the ending was more obvious. Then there was Titanic and Avatar which were basically completely special effects driven and the stories were just bland and cliche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. Dumbed down movies do ssem to make more money. James Cameron&#8217;s movies are a good example. His movies have gotten progressively dumber but they&#8217;ve been making more money. Terminator had an interesting story, a cool paradox, and ended rather ambiguously. Aliens was still very interesting even though the story was more straightforward. Abyss had a more complicated plot but didn&#8217;t do very well at the box office. While Terminator 2 was a good movie, it was really dumbed down compared to the first Terminator. They pretty much explained everything to the audience and the ending was more obvious. Then there was Titanic and Avatar which were basically completely special effects driven and the stories were just bland and cliche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220527</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 03:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220527</guid>
		<description>May I recommend &#039;Memento&#039; as a really good &quot;thinking film&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I recommend &#8216;Memento&#8217; as a really good &#8220;thinking film&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220424</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 20:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220424</guid>
		<description>Possibly. I think looking at the name &quot;Blade Runner&quot; on it&#039;s own, it could be hard for an outsider to picture anything other than an action movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly. I think looking at the name &#8220;Blade Runner&#8221; on it&#8217;s own, it could be hard for an outsider to picture anything other than an action movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aknot</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220275</link>
		<dc:creator>Aknot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220275</guid>
		<description>Is that because they &quot;see&quot; Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer and think &quot;action&quot; not taking them time to watch/read the movie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that because they &#8220;see&#8221; Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer and think &#8220;action&#8221; not taking them time to watch/read the movie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220261</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220261</guid>
		<description>Great post, but perhaps Blade Runner isn&#039;t the best example of a film that could have made a lot of money even with the right marketing. Every person I&#039;ve shown the movie to has walked away with mixed reactions - myself included. Whether it was the complex plot, depressing mood, or misplaced expectations, bigger movie-buffs than me were left cold from the experience. 

I came to love Blade Runner with several replays, but it&#039;s definitely not a crowd pleaser that it needed to be for success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, but perhaps Blade Runner isn&#8217;t the best example of a film that could have made a lot of money even with the right marketing. Every person I&#8217;ve shown the movie to has walked away with mixed reactions &#8211; myself included. Whether it was the complex plot, depressing mood, or misplaced expectations, bigger movie-buffs than me were left cold from the experience. </p>
<p>I came to love Blade Runner with several replays, but it&#8217;s definitely not a crowd pleaser that it needed to be for success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intelliq</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220122</link>
		<dc:creator>intelliq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 01:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220122</guid>
		<description>There were bad movies before, and there&#039;s no shortage now.  The only difference I sense is the amount movies cost to make and what they charge to watch.  Other than that, Im coming up short trying make a list of differences that are meaningful.

I guess we could debate if each generation is &quot;less intelligent&quot; than the one before it, but Im not sure any result would correlate well to the &quot;hollywood machine&#039;s&quot; latest batch of movies.  

Good food for thought, I&#039;d like to see some studies on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were bad movies before, and there&#8217;s no shortage now.  The only difference I sense is the amount movies cost to make and what they charge to watch.  Other than that, Im coming up short trying make a list of differences that are meaningful.</p>
<p>I guess we could debate if each generation is &#8220;less intelligent&#8221; than the one before it, but Im not sure any result would correlate well to the &#8220;hollywood machine&#8217;s&#8221; latest batch of movies.  </p>
<p>Good food for thought, I&#8217;d like to see some studies on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel f</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220074</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 22:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220074</guid>
		<description>Yes because kids not paying attention to teachers at a very young age is such a crazy new concept. Gen Y was the first time that ever happened. 

One crappy little article is meaningless considering every few years there is a new editorial or study out saying kids these days sheesh. Even better this article blames television and film the very thing we support on this site. When things are not perfect older adults love to blame one of three things technology, kids, or of course good ol TV. You managed to blame all three. I&#039;m guess you missed the geration Y cut off by a year or two so you decided to blame Gen Y. I make this assumption because you grew up in the 80 s and 90s so your either gen Y or just barely gen X which gives you the ability to blame another generation other than yours. 

I notice you of coursed ignored the fact that the average movie length is not actually shorter than the 80s and the fact that there of been bad films since decades before Gen Y was even thought of. Of course it&#039;s much easier to blame the genetics than actually think about things critically and come up with a real conclusion. Try looking up articles from the 80s they did articles and studies back then where they said kids were out of control and had a much lower attention span they also did it in the 70s and the 60s. Every one acts like their generation was the good ol days just like it&#039;s easy to say that the 50s were perfect and we lived the good ol American way .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes because kids not paying attention to teachers at a very young age is such a crazy new concept. Gen Y was the first time that ever happened. </p>
<p>One crappy little article is meaningless considering every few years there is a new editorial or study out saying kids these days sheesh. Even better this article blames television and film the very thing we support on this site. When things are not perfect older adults love to blame one of three things technology, kids, or of course good ol TV. You managed to blame all three. I&#8217;m guess you missed the geration Y cut off by a year or two so you decided to blame Gen Y. I make this assumption because you grew up in the 80 s and 90s so your either gen Y or just barely gen X which gives you the ability to blame another generation other than yours. </p>
<p>I notice you of coursed ignored the fact that the average movie length is not actually shorter than the 80s and the fact that there of been bad films since decades before Gen Y was even thought of. Of course it&#8217;s much easier to blame the genetics than actually think about things critically and come up with a real conclusion. Try looking up articles from the 80s they did articles and studies back then where they said kids were out of control and had a much lower attention span they also did it in the 70s and the 60s. Every one acts like their generation was the good ol days just like it&#8217;s easy to say that the 50s were perfect and we lived the good ol American way .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220042</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220042</guid>
		<description>http://dailyuw.com/2001/10/4/the-attention-span/
&quot;I’ve modified my teaching methods,” another teacher confided in Healy, “because of their lack of attention span and their impatience.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dailyuw.com/2001/10/4/the-attention-span/" rel="nofollow">http://dailyuw.com/2001/10/4/the-attention-span/</a><br />
&#8220;I’ve modified my teaching methods,” another teacher confided in Healy, “because of their lack of attention span and their impatience.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel f</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-220027</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-220027</guid>
		<description>Sorry Marcus but your wrong. The bad films coming out have noting to do with the youth and  short attention span. The average movie length is roughly the same as the 80s the majority of films coming out still land on right near 2 hours. Longer movies still make tons of money check Lord of the rings or TDk.  There were short movies in the 50s all the way to the 90s and there were crappy films to. Also alot of really crappy films these days are still 2hours long.
 
Every one always wants to blame the newest youth just like they did with my generation and the gen before that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Marcus but your wrong. The bad films coming out have noting to do with the youth and  short attention span. The average movie length is roughly the same as the 80s the majority of films coming out still land on right near 2 hours. Longer movies still make tons of money check Lord of the rings or TDk.  There were short movies in the 50s all the way to the 90s and there were crappy films to. Also alot of really crappy films these days are still 2hours long.</p>
<p>Every one always wants to blame the newest youth just like they did with my generation and the gen before that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-219974</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-219974</guid>
		<description>No one should be taking my comments as an anti-generational attack; however, it is an observation of the attention span Gen-Y does have. Since they are too consumed with information technologies, the quality of shows and movies have suffered due to their lack of interest. So, the studios have dumbed things down, and they shortened the length of movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one should be taking my comments as an anti-generational attack; however, it is an observation of the attention span Gen-Y does have. Since they are too consumed with information technologies, the quality of shows and movies have suffered due to their lack of interest. So, the studios have dumbed things down, and they shortened the length of movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel f</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-219915</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-219915</guid>
		<description>Oh great an anti young generation speach Just what we needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh great an anti young generation speach Just what we needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-219847</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 02:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-219847</guid>
		<description>(When I made the statement above, I was referring to action, thrillers, and science-fiction films.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(When I made the statement above, I was referring to action, thrillers, and science-fiction films.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-219846</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 02:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-219846</guid>
		<description>When I go to the movies, I expect a 2 1/2 hour film with a little substance. It doesn&#039;t have to be too much, but it should not be too little. As someone who grew up in the 80s and 90s, I consider myself spoiled by lengthy movies that were made to make you escape reality. Movies are all about having fun, and to experience something that plays on the imagination. &quot;Escape from reality.&quot;

As we fast-forward to the new millennium, the average length of a movie is 1 1/2 hours long. Substance and originality have been substituted for a cheap CGI backdrop, which prevents the actors from digging deep into the psyche. Instead of getting genuine emotional responses, we now have artificial reactions when something happens in the environment. 

Millennials (Generation Y: 1985 - Now) have short attention spans, which is the result of futzing around with iPods, cellphones, and other internet (information) technologies. As a result of a generation of people who need to be connected, movies have become shorter and dumber. 

Yes, the studios are correct. When it comes to this new generation of movie goers, they would not be able to sit though a 2 1/2 (to 3) hour movie with substance. So, we are left with expensive CGI movies about nothing.

If I had to make a wager, only one handful of movies, between 2000 and 2010, actually had something rational. Everything else is junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I go to the movies, I expect a 2 1/2 hour film with a little substance. It doesn&#8217;t have to be too much, but it should not be too little. As someone who grew up in the 80s and 90s, I consider myself spoiled by lengthy movies that were made to make you escape reality. Movies are all about having fun, and to experience something that plays on the imagination. &#8220;Escape from reality.&#8221;</p>
<p>As we fast-forward to the new millennium, the average length of a movie is 1 1/2 hours long. Substance and originality have been substituted for a cheap CGI backdrop, which prevents the actors from digging deep into the psyche. Instead of getting genuine emotional responses, we now have artificial reactions when something happens in the environment. </p>
<p>Millennials (Generation Y: 1985 &#8211; Now) have short attention spans, which is the result of futzing around with iPods, cellphones, and other internet (information) technologies. As a result of a generation of people who need to be connected, movies have become shorter and dumber. </p>
<p>Yes, the studios are correct. When it comes to this new generation of movie goers, they would not be able to sit though a 2 1/2 (to 3) hour movie with substance. So, we are left with expensive CGI movies about nothing.</p>
<p>If I had to make a wager, only one handful of movies, between 2000 and 2010, actually had something rational. Everything else is junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foopher</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-219816</link>
		<dc:creator>foopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-219816</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s refreshing that there&#039;s finally a movie where you have to pay attention and think about the plot. That&#039;s been lacking lately. The special effects look amazing and i can&#039;t wait for this film!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s refreshing that there&#8217;s finally a movie where you have to pay attention and think about the plot. That&#8217;s been lacking lately. The special effects look amazing and i can&#8217;t wait for this film!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/inception-smart-blockbuster-movie-discussion-mikee-66216/comment-page-4/#comment-219568</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=66216#comment-219568</guid>
		<description>I for one plan out certain movies that I want to watch on the big screen and some of them are the blockbuster (usually Comic Book Movies or Sci-Fi) and there are Indie movies that I would like to go to see but I live in such a rural community that we only get the big blockbuster films and once in a while cerebral films that play for a couple of weeks, plus with a family I also have to fit in the obligatory Disney or Pixar film for the season; which seems to fill my budget for the year. I personally don&#039;t see the difficulty in understanding the concept of Inception it seems to give most of the information during the trailers. I agree that the marketing department is betting that people will go see it just so they can prove that they can figure it out but Nolan does make some good, intelligent films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one plan out certain movies that I want to watch on the big screen and some of them are the blockbuster (usually Comic Book Movies or Sci-Fi) and there are Indie movies that I would like to go to see but I live in such a rural community that we only get the big blockbuster films and once in a while cerebral films that play for a couple of weeks, plus with a family I also have to fit in the obligatory Disney or Pixar film for the season; which seems to fill my budget for the year. I personally don&#8217;t see the difficulty in understanding the concept of Inception it seems to give most of the information during the trailers. I agree that the marketing department is betting that people will go see it just so they can prove that they can figure it out but Nolan does make some good, intelligent films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

