‘Immortals’ Review

Published 3 years ago by , Updated February 10th, 2012 at 12:15 pm,

Henry Cavill Immortals Immortals Review

Screen Rant’s Ben Kendrick reviews Immortals

Director Tarsem Singh is one of the most stimulating filmmakers operating in Hollywood today, a visionary whose films often attempt to blur the lines between cinematic entertainment and artistry, often reveling in visual spectacle. As a result, for some moviegoers, his projects have routinely been lost somewhere in the middle ground. His film The Fall has been criticized as an incoherent series of abstract imagery – and similarly, some critics disregarded his psycho-thriller The Cell as a film whose story failed to live up to the ambitions of the onscreen visuals.

So, has the director managed to strike a healthier balance with Immortals,  his most “commercial” film to date? Or does his gods and Greek warriors epic fall short under the weight of 3D visual pageantry?

While Immortals may not deliver an especially rich narrative or deep and complicated characters, the film’s story is far more linear and controlled than Singh’s other works. As result, despite relying on one-dimensional motivations and some melodramatic exchanges, the character moments successfully keep the film moving in between combat set pieces and sequences that highlight Singh’s trademark visual stylings.

Mickey Rourke Immortals Immortals Review

Mickey Rourke as King Hyperion in 'Immortals'

The story, which features some intriguing twists on Greek mythology, begins after the infamous War of the Titans – as King Hyperion (Mickey Rourke) attempts to enact revenge on the Olympians for the death of his family. Hyperion and his army slay Greek settlement after settlement in search of the Epirus Bow – a weapon created by Heracles (Steve Byers), capable of freeing the Titans from Tartarus and turning the tide against Zeus and the other gods. To combat the threat, Zeus (Luke Evans) enlists Theseus (Henry Cavill), a fearless peasant, to fight Hyperion and his army – since the Olympians have been forbidden from interfering in the battle.

 There’s no question that the narrative itself is thin – relying heavily on a series of convenient developments in order to get from point A to point B. Nearly every character’s motivation is entirely one-note, explained away in less than two sentences, and will boil down to some variation of “love,” “faith,” “honor,” etc. Even in the case of Theseus, whose character undergoes the largest transformation – from lowly-but-capable peasant to instrument of the gods – it’s nearly impossible to see any real difference in the man himself, aside from the respect he begins to cull from others throughout the course of the proceedings.

This isn’t to say that the performances themselves are entirely hollow or emotionless. Mickey Rourke carries the film with a cool and sinister take on Hyperion, tasked with delivering a ton of dialogue that, in less-capable hands, could have fallen flat. Cavill succeeds in rallying the audience to his side and definitely excels in a number of hard-hitting fight sequences. (Though, for anyone still stressed about the actor’s casting in Man of Steel, his performance as Theseus isn’t likely to give film-fans much insight into how he will play Superman, one way or the other, as the story doesn’t provide Theseus much room to be anything but a sympathetic killing machine.)

immortals red band clip Immortals Review

Luke Evans (center) leads the Olympians as Zeus in 'Immortals'

The supporting cast is equally competent: Luke Evans (playing Zeus) and Freida Pinto (playing Phaedra) ground things a bit, since a lot of the other surrounding characters are one-note warriors with no caution or remorse. Stephen Dorff also manages to bring a bit of light-hearted charm to the proceedings as Stavros – though his character is about as thin as any of Singh’s creations.

However, this film isn’t aiming to explore deep character motivations, and, to an extent, seems to revel in the simplicity of its Greek mythology “source material,”  while abandoning many of the more complicated character histories (Theseus was the son of Poseidon and King Hyperion was a Titan – though neither of these angles are directly explored in the film). Instead, Immortals successfully focuses on twisting the larger-than-life stories into compelling and, of course, interesting-looking onscreen action.

The variations on traditional mythology do not disappoint when Olympians elect to interfere in a variety of iconic ways, or when Theseus is pitted against a “Beast” in the labyrinth (among other sequences). It’s in these hyper-realistic set-pieces that Singh’s visual style really shines, as the director seems to have toiled over every single detail – setting, costume design, color palette, etc – creating some extremely rich and immersive onscreen eye candy. Where other films merely flaunt cool-looking visuals for the sake of showing audiences eye-popping CGI effects, even static set-dressings in Immortals succeed in building tension while capturing a Renaissance-like composition that is at the same time both beautiful and horrific.

Henry Cavill Freida Pinto Immortals Immortals Review

'Immortals' heroes Stavros, Theseus, Phaedra, and The Monk

That’s not to say that film is bogged down in merely attempting to look like a moving painting: Immortals also features some pretty exciting and impressively shot action. While the battles are simply not on the immense scale of films like 300 or Clash of the Titans (which featured enormous monsters and diverse fight scenarios), the combat sequences in Immortals are still impressive – especially since a pair of Theseus’ choreographed fight scenes appear to occur in one continuous take as Cavill ducks, spins, and slashes through a series of enemies. These combat sequences also make worthy use of the film’s 3D format – as spears punch through characters at odd angles and the added depth keeps bodies from overlapping in close quarter combat.

Early on, Singh conceived of a number of the film’s action sequences (as well as large-scale visuals) with 3D in mind – and the film definitely falls more on the side of the subtle-but-cool-looking 3D experience than an all-out in your face 3D extravaganza. Significant portions of the film don’t always take advantage of the added dimension, but two or three of the combat sequences (especially the finale) – along with some cool establishing shots (such as the introduction of the Titans) – make it worth the price of the format upgrade.

Immortals isn’t as over-the-top as some moviegoers might be anticipating, given its “From the Producers of 300” marketing. While it’s definitely another stylized, big-budget, swords and shields epic, the real strength of the film lies in Tarsem Singh’s imaginative vision – which is subsequently held together by an adequate story of gods, titans, and humanity. Film fans looking for deep and compelling character development or enormous CGI monsters may find the proceedings somewhat limited in scope (given Singh’s focus on a relatively grounded and thin human storyline); but for anyone interested in a mix of stunning visual compositions and brutal fight sequences, Immortals isn’t likely to disappoint.

If you’re still on the fence about Immortals, check out the trailer below:

-

[poll id="215"]

-

Follow me on Twitter @benkendrick - and let us know what you thought of the film below:

Immortals is now in theaters.

Our Rating:

3.5 out of 5
(Very Good)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: immortals

45 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. Immortals DVD has just been made available for pre-order though the ImmortalsDVD.com website. just thought you would like to know.

  2. After viewing Immortals, I read reveiws to see if anyone thought the movie was just too dark. I rented a dvd, could not see most of the scenes, and after each scene, I had to guess what was ocurring, simply could not see due to the very dark filming, seems most scenes were shot at night or very little lighting was used. I just thought it would have been much better if I could have seen more of what was happening. No one else seemed to think so, since after reading many reviews, I saw no complaints about the movie being too dark. I wonder if the dvd was defective????

    • @harry titus I rented the movie from youtube and also downloaded a separated DVD rip for comparison. I had the exact same problems. The scenes were so dark that it was impossible to tell what was going on. I heard swords and grunts, but the screen was completely dark. However, the clips uploaded on youtube look great. Maybe BDR works better for this film. I feel ripped of.

    • Im sitting here watching this film on my blu-ray player with a standard DVD from redbox and I’m so glad I only spent a dollar on it, because I’ve only seen about 1/3 of the movie..due to all the super dark screen shots..I’m horribly disappointed..maybe I’ll try a blu-ray disc next time

    • I had exactly the same problem with the blu-ray. It seemed like an old 70′s movie.

  3. Although the story line didn’t turn out like I expected, I have to admit it was very entertaining! I would watch it again!

  4. Too many heavy american accents. bad dialogue. poor casting. style over content. historical & mythological inaccuracies. poor cinematography considering the stylistic visual approach. on the plus side, colour tones are great, some great action battle scenes. worth a watch on Blu-ray tho, I have seen worse.

  5. Just watched this movie. I was going to strongly disagree with the review, then I saw Vic’s own comment and I agreed completely with him. He said it better than I ever could’ve.

    Super pretty movie though, albeit very dark in some parts. But the story itself did not deserve that much attention to detail. It’s a shame and a waste of some obviously hard work.

  6. The movie was “Good” not “Great” – not close to as good as 300.
    But it had a lot going for it. Some complained about the gore, well don’t watch a war movie if you are looking for a nice, squishy, feel good movie.
    It is a war movie, pretty much a guy movie.
    For those that complain it was too dark, you just don’t have your TV’s adjusted properly.
    It was dark at first on mine, I just cranked the brightness up and voila, it looked fine.