New ‘I, Frankenstein’ TV Spot With Aaron Eckhart Punching a Gargoyle

Published 11 months ago by , Updated January 19th, 2014 at 10:53 am,

Despite what the title of Stuart Beattie’s upcoming action fantasy film I, Frankenstein might suggest, protagonist Adam (Aaron Eckhart) is not Victor Frankenstein himself. Instead he is Frankenstein’s immortal creation, cursed to walk the Earth forever with very superficial scarring on his six-pack and chiselled jawline, unable to escape the knowledge that he will only ever be ruggedly handsome instead of clean-cut handsome.

Luckily, there is a war brewing between gargoyles and demons that will provide a useful distraction from this ongoing torment. Though Adam lives as something of an outcast from normal human society due to the aforementioned flaws in his conventional good looks, he is determined to protect humanity at all costs, and pledges to do so in this new TV spot for I, Frankenstein.

The shot of Eckhart jumping and flying horizontally through the air in order to punch a gargoyle in the face was also shown in the full-length trailer, but if there’s any shot worthy of being shown twice then that is the one. It speaks to what will likely be I, Frankenstein‘s niche: a popcorn flick with enough action to be entertaining, but probably not the kind of content that sticks in the mind too long after leaving the theater. In that respect, the film actually looks pretty good, with some decent effects and the promise of some exciting fight scenes.

Aaron Eckhart and Yvonne Strahovski in I Frankenstein New I, Frankenstein TV Spot With Aaron Eckhart Punching a Gargoyle

Eckhart has been experimenting with a range of genres since receiving widespread attention for his role as Harvey Dent/Two-Face in The Dark Knight, mixing straightforward action movies like Olympus Has Fallen with low-budget indie fare Rabbit Hole and even some romantic drama in Love Happens. However, I, Frankenstein marks his return to the comic book movie genre as well as his first turn playing the lead in such a film. I, Frankenstein isn’t directly based on Mary Shelley’s novel, but rather on the comic books by Kevin Grevioux (which are loosely based on Shelley’s novel).

With a reported $36 million budget, I, Frankenstein needs to perform fairly well at the box office despite being thrown out into the chilly month of January, but the producers have experience with this genre and budgetary model thanks to their work on the Underworld movies, three of which were released in January with respectable profits made. Even if I, Frankenstein doesn’t draw in the kind of crowds needed to build a whole franchise, it looks like it has enough genre appeal to find an audience.

_____

I, Frankenstein is out in theaters on January 24th, 2014.

Source: Lionsgate

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: i frankenstein

5 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. it looks sooo bad.

  2. First I thought this would be a period piece, and I said “Period piece good!”. Then I saw it would not be, and would be modern, and I said, “Modern piece bad!”. Then I saw this trailer, and said, in my best Frankenstein voice in imitation of the Monster in “Bride of Frankenstein”, “Aarrggh, durned if I know!!”. So this trailer with the gargoyles has given me the impetus to give it a watch, and we will see. This could still go south very easily, but appears to be a third-cousin companion-piece to the Van Helsing-style genre.

  3. O………….MY………………..GOD……………………

    When the special effects lok bad in the trailer you know its gonna be bad.

  4. The movie is called “I, Frankenstein,” so I keep wondering who is playing Frankenstein.

  5. Hmmm, this looks interesting, and not necessarily in good way……