With DC Comics about to have another hit on their hands when Watchmen premieres in theaters on March 6th, a lot of movie blogs/news sites have been pondering where DC/Warner Bros. should go from here.
With all the hype surrounding Watchmen, and all the internet chatter about DC Comics’ uncertain cinematic future, I found myself wondering: Why hasn’t DC had as much success at the box office as rival company Marvel?
In an attempt to answer that very question I came up with this comprehensive guide to how DC Comics SHOULD be making movies.
| |
This week, writer/director Joss Whedon (Dollhouse, Firefly) spoke up about why he believes DC Comics has had a hard time making the transition to the big screen. According to Whedon, Batman has been a cinematic cash cow in the last few years primarily because The Caped Crusader is one of the only heroes out of the DC stable who’s whole reason for being a “hero” is an all too human anguish that makes him easily relatable to the average person.
I get what Whedon is saying on that front: I’ve always maintained that Superman Returns flopped in large part because the film was this grand meditation on why Superman is better than the average person–not just because of his god-like powers, but rather the moral strength of his character. In this day and age what moviegoer wants to pay money to see a film where they’re being told that some Superman is better than them? If Superman Unleashed hopes to revitalize the struggling franchise, I hope the filmmakers are out there right now scouring comic shops and compiling the most celebrated Superman stories they can get their hands on.
Marvel on the other hand, has always had the luxury of building their movie franchises on the backs of characters that Stan Lee purposefully created as allegories for the experiences of the common man, so that the common man would better be able to relate to them. Peter Parker is the geek who never gets the girl; X-Men are minorities who face discrimination and prejudice at every turn, etc… etc… We relate to these characters because they’ve been fashioned for us to do so. It’s easier for a fanboy to believe he can be Spider-Man than Superman; therefore it’s easier for the moviegoer who doesn’t read comics to believe the same.
However, I do think Whedon’s comments overlook an important point. Batman Begins and The Dark Knight were big $uccesses at the box office (IMHO) because the filmmakers drew their screenplays from some of the most celebrated Batman lore that is currently in print. Batman Begins borrowed heavily from Frank Miller and David Mazzucchelli’s now-classic reimagining of The Caped Crusader’s origins, Batman: Year One. The Dark Knight’s intricately woven crime-saga was built off the comic book bones of Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale’s noir-epic, The Long Halloween, while Heath Ledger’s Oscar-winning performance as The Joker borrowed from the more dark and modern renderings of The Clown Prince of Crime such as Alan Moore and Brian Bolland’s The Killing Joke.

And for those who’ve been paying close attention, DC/Warner Bros.’ next big venture, Green Lantern, has generated positive early buzz primarily because the script for the film will reportedly adhere closely to “Emerald Dawn,” one of the most famous GL stories ever told.
Do you see the pattern here?
The powers that be over at DC/Warner Bros. need to start thinking not only of which DC characters deserve a box office run, but also which famous DC Comics stories need to be told. To phrase this another way: DC, let Marvel worry about the character stuff; you worry about the many, many celebrated storylines you have at your disposal.
Watchmen is a perfect example of what I’m talking about. It’s one of the most famous Comic book stories ever told under the DC banner–now it’s poised to be one of the biggest movies of 2009. Watchmen has endured not because of people’s fascination with the particular characters (aside from maybe Rorschach), but rather because of the impact of the story as a whole. Name me one Marvel storyline (storyline, not character) that has had THAT kind of social impact.
So what other famous stories does DC have to tell? Obviously there is Frank Miller’s iconic vision of Batman’s future, The Dark Knight Returns–a subject which resurfaced once again this week, in an interview First Showing conducted with Watchmen director Zack Snyder. (Snyder would still like to tackle the project, but there’s no guarantee yet that he will. Maybe Watchmen will change that if it does well enough at the box office.)
DC/Vertigo’s The Losers is on track to becoming a feature film. The comic had only a small cult following, but many of those that read it have had good things to say about it. We’ll see how the film turns out.

If I ruled Hollywood (and I aim to), I would love to see the early Preacher storylines compiled into a film (I’m talking the “Gone To Texas” and “Until The End of Time” storylines). There’s also Jeph Loeb and Jim Lee’s Batman: Hush, or Grant Morrison and Frank Quitely’s All Star Superman–arguably one of the best Superman stories I’ve read in the last decade. Another safe bet would be ANY of the stories Grant Morrison told during his run on Justice League, should a JL movie ever crawl its way out of the grave.
Of course I’m just scratching the surface here. There are many, many, great DC Comics storylines that I’m totally blanking on at this moment. But then, that’s why I have you my wonderful, knowledgeable, readers. What DC Comics Storylines do you think DC/Warner should be adapting for the big screen? Hit us back and let us know.
Sources: Slash Film & First Showing




59 Comments
A lot of people complain about the lack of relatable qualities of DC characters (a sentiment with which I disagree), but for the sake of intelligent discussion, I propose a DC story that I think would work quite well as film (provided an able director and actors worked on it). “Secret Identity” (written, I believe, by Kurt Busiek) is an excellent story in which a normal boy teased by his peers for having the name Clark Kent, though clearly living in the mundane real world, discovers one day that he does in fact possess the powers and abilities of his comic-book namesake. The story remains firmly rooted in the real world (he even explains why he has to be careful with certain rescues and how the comic book rescues would turn disasterous because of the laws of physics) but NEVER lacks for adventure. There are no aliens, but other amazing individuals are hinted at. The tale delivers a strong narrative with great characterization AND even recognizes the DC Universe. This means that this film can be a wonderful stepping stone for DC to reintroduce and revisit the Superman mythos. Finally, in terms of film viability, Clark narrates the story, so you even have someone clarifying any plot points for those who do not normally spend a great deal of time in the realm of spandex and superpowers. What does everyone think?
Good article, I agree and disagree with a few things. Marvel has done a better job when bringing their stories to the big screen but I don’t think its because moviegoers identify more with a hero like Spiderman over Superman. The fact is DC is sitting on a goldmine with the characters they have in the stable, ie TDK. DC needs to learn from what Marvel has done in their films to introduce and develop the characters and what they have done themselves with the Batman franchise. If DC reboots Superman and makes it the way we all want to see it, it would hold its own against Spidey 4. On to JLA, just think about how amazing this movie would be. All of the great DC characters together, its a blueprint for the #1 grossing movie of all time. Yes it is a huge undertaking but the payoff would be an amazing movie with huge profit.
I think a new Superman movie should have him, not only older looking and more “experienced”, but just plain gritty. Imagine im on an alien planet battling numerous foes(that are true to the comic book) and having them look beautifully rendered in CGI. With lots of blood….a well thought out(and deep) story line etc. etc. etc.
I am an equal fan of Marvel and DC comics and would love to see more good stories from either make it to the big screen… but really, before even wishing for a movie to be made, you have to be realistic and consider what should be done for the movie to even stand some chance of quality.
I think Marvel’s movies are doing it the right way, first introducing some heroes in their own stories and backgrounds, and now slowly moving towards an Avengers movie. Iron Man, Incredible Hulk and Spider-Man 1 & 2 are good examples of well-made superhero movies that can also be good introductions for these characters to be in The Avengers movie.
About a JLA movie, what DC and WB are lacking is just that: not enough characters properly introduced to the big screen yet. Justice League may be a lot about Superman and Batman, but even these two are far from ready for a JLA movie.
First, we need another good Batman movie to complete the trilogy, see the character truly evolve and deal with the situation that The Dark Knight has left him in. Then we’d need a damn good sequel to Superman Returns, which in my opinion wasn’t a really bad movie, just kind of a simple one, a plain re-introduction of the character. If I remember well, B. Singer said somewhere he had plans for a sequel where Superman would face more challenge and a greater enemy, and Singer promised to go all ”Wrath of Khan” on that one. (yes, he is a big Star Trek fan hehe)
So who knows, maybe if these 2 movies get made first and work well, then we could see more DC characters appear and eventually a JL movie can take place. But rushing things and trying to do a JLA movie right now just to try and catch up with the Avengers project would not only be unrealistic, it would be plain stupid… and could even ruin the possibility of some future good movies getting made about the DC heroes.
Um am I the only one sick of seeing Superman fight Lex Luthor. It gets old real fast. I want to see some punches being thrown, not Superman saving cats out of trees. Had Superman Returns been done right the next film might have been The Death of Superman, that is if an actual supervillain (I’m talking Mongul) been introduced in Superman Returns. Bryan Singer killed Superman Returns as well as X-Men. Put the movies into the hands of someone who cares about Supes. If Superman’s next movie tries to take the conservative route and make Lex the main villain again, we can say goodbye once and for all to the Superman movie franchise
“am I the only one sick of seeing Superman fight Lex Luthor”
No, you’re not. Give us another villain, PLEASE.
Vic
This thread may be old now, but one of my favorite story lines in DC was in the pages of The Flash (Silver Age run). Barry’s arch nemesis, Prof. Zoom, decides to kill Barry’s wife, Iris, with a simple vibrating hand to the brain. He doesn’t soliloquize about it; he doesn’t boast about his plans to do it; he just does it. To top it off, Barry was drugged (and unable to help) and a massive investigation began to determine just who killed Iris that spanned several issues. What I liked most about it is that it dispensed with all the silly Rube Goldberg-like plots and with Barry drugged, there was no need to develop a silly explanation for why he couldn’t stop Zoom. Zoom just killed Iris, plain and simple, and it destroyed Barry.
Of course we all learned years later that Iris didn’t really die and that ruined the whole story, as DC usually does. But a film wouldn’t have to make the same mistake.
Watchmen was a disgrace. What is this guy talking about?
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!