Heroes Creators Actually Get It

Published 8 years ago by , Updated February 9th, 2012 at 9:17 pm,

heroes Heroes Creators Actually Get ItOver at Sci Fi Wire there’s an interview with Tim Kring, creator of NBC’s Heroes which gives me the warm fuzzies about the show. There’s a lot of good information there, but the upshot is that he and the others involved in the production actually understand that you cannot string the audience along indefinitely.

Tim Kring referenced X-Files, which I’ve stated here many times is what Lost is in danger of becoming with their never-ending “dangling carrot” method of storytelling (Although over the past couple of weeks that seems to be improving. A bit.). If you haven’t followed my comparison here the issue is one of providing so many different threads and red herrings that by the end of it all nothing can be satisfying enough as a conclusion, and that by then the audience has been jerked around for so long that they no longer care.

I’m not saying that all the mystery needs to be removed from a story, but there needs to be a sense of forward motion over time, not just movement sideways, and the Heroes people seem to understand that:

“I feel pretty good about the fact that we didn’t leave a lot of things dangling for people… The other big thing is we just have to reveal things in a timely fashion and not let them build up,”

He also alluded to giving the show a sense of closure for each season:

“…the other thing was the idea of trying to wrap things up in one season. Or one volume. And then start over in the next volume, but something new, so you give people the sense that there are closed-ended qualities to the show.”

This concept has worked really well for Fox TV’s 24 and I’m eager to see how they apply it to this show. Although Lost began the surge of this type of show, the creators would do well to take a hint from Heroes.

For the full story, head over to Sci Fi Wire.

TAGS: Heroes
Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Indeed, I believe this was the very reason I gave up watching the X-Files at around the third or fourth season. It was initially gripping, but when all you have are questions, waiting forever with no answers, you just stop caring, as I did. I didn’t even see how the show wrapped up, and when I found out the ultimate fate of the characters, it was met with a shrug and a yawn.

    One of the other great things in the interview was Kring revealing his desire to produce more episodes like “Company Man”, which was one of the greatest hours of television in recent history, in my opinion.

    This is engrossing television at its best, and I hope it actually rubs off well on other television writers (i.e. not to misappropriate what makes the show successful, like producers who mistake great fx for great stories, do.)

    Last thought: If Serenity can generate a great film after only a single season, I wonder (if this show stays the course) if Heroes will ever translate to film? It would make great entertainment on the big screen or small, I think.

  2. Yeah, when recently David Duchovny mentioned the possibility of another “X-Files” movie my first thought was “Who’s going to show up to see it?” :-)