<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guy Ritchie Confirms Moriarty Will Be In &#8216;Sherlock Holmes&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/guy-richie-confirms-moriarty-sherlock-holmes-robf-22534/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/guy-richie-confirms-moriarty-sherlock-holmes-robf-22534/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/guy-richie-confirms-moriarty-sherlock-holmes-robf-22534/comment-page-1/#comment-129712</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=22534#comment-129712</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a thought, why not scrap the whole bloody film and start over with a completely British cast? I mean God forbid Hollywood should show any loyalty to true literature. That&#039;s the problem with entertainment today, nobody bases films on their books details because nobody bloody reads. I agree with Michael, our younger generations are being brianwashed into believing great literature can be represented by farces like this. No wonder so many people say &quot;I&#039;ll wait for the movie to come out&quot;. Hollywood&#039;s raping classics to breed idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a thought, why not scrap the whole bloody film and start over with a completely British cast? I mean God forbid Hollywood should show any loyalty to true literature. That&#8217;s the problem with entertainment today, nobody bases films on their books details because nobody bloody reads. I agree with Michael, our younger generations are being brianwashed into believing great literature can be represented by farces like this. No wonder so many people say &#8220;I&#8217;ll wait for the movie to come out&#8221;. Hollywood&#8217;s raping classics to breed idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/guy-richie-confirms-moriarty-sherlock-holmes-robf-22534/comment-page-1/#comment-127098</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=22534#comment-127098</guid>
		<description>what a stupid idea this is making sherlock holms ? we live in a much different world and today&#039;s younger generation does not know or even understand who sherlock holms is and i can tell you this movie will not fly at all, money down the drain. please do yourselves a favor and abort this lameduck movie before all who are involved get ridiculed/laghed at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a stupid idea this is making sherlock holms ? we live in a much different world and today&#8217;s younger generation does not know or even understand who sherlock holms is and i can tell you this movie will not fly at all, money down the drain. please do yourselves a favor and abort this lameduck movie before all who are involved get ridiculed/laghed at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/guy-richie-confirms-moriarty-sherlock-holmes-robf-22534/comment-page-1/#comment-123101</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=22534#comment-123101</guid>
		<description>Maybe Mark Strongs character is actually Moriarty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Mark Strongs character is actually Moriarty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

