Recent Related Items:

87 Comments


@The Critic

Ah – I think he misinterpreted my score and thought it was out of 5.

@JM

We’ll see if I feel differently when I see it again, but I enjoyed it for what it was.

Vic

Nick says:

Vic, I have been reading your reviews for a while now, and each are spot on, especially G.I. joe. The acting may not be Shakespeare but it I serviceable and it does it’s job as a popcorn flick. Now TF 2, on the other hand, poor acting ( Shia Lewhatever looking constipated for 2 hours is not acting) and micheal bay’s rotating camera gives me a headache, but I liked TF 2 because of Optimis Prime and Megan Fox. Overall, G.I. Joe is a superior film, so don’t let these haters get you down Vic!

Mighty Joe Young says:

I saw this with my younger brothers over the weekend. I was pretty on the fence about it but Vic’s reviews as well as those on a few other sites, convinced me to give it a shot.

I was mildly surprised by it. Very mildly. When I first left the theater I really thought that it wasn’t that bad, maybe a 7. However, after lunch we re-watched the Incredible Hulk and that put it in perspective. Don’t get me wrong, I wasn’t expecting this to be anywhere as good as Hulk or Iron Man, but I think some of the other posts have been spot-on when they suggest that this year’s weak summer lineup have skewed our expectations. Just because a movie doesn’t suck, doesn’t neccesarily mean it’s good either. That’s what I felt G.I. Joe was. It didn’t suck, but it honestly wasn’t good.

@Mighty Joe Young

Hey, I agree. Was it a GREAT film? Not even close. Was it an ENTERTAINING film? I say yes, most definitely.

Vic

JM says:

The last half hour was boring as hell. A complete mess. How can you bash transformers last half hour and then like this one?

It’s the same thing!! They both suck! It seems you are giving the 3.5 comparing this with transformers and not judging this film by itself.

Startrek and Wall-e just .5 away of GI JOE? I dont get it.

So in this scale JCVD and GI JOE deserve the same rating? Ouch.

@JM

Sometimes I think I’d be better off just doing away with the whole rating system and just leave the reviews to stand on their own. I’ve run into this in the past and the answer is that I don’t rate movies on an absolute scale – I rate them according to their genre and/or what they’re trying to accomplish. I had fun at this movie despite the dumb stuff, apparently like tons of people had fun at Transformers 2 despite the problems with that film.

As to Star Trek, I was probably a bit harsh on that being a Classic Trek fan, holding it up to a higher standard (like you and Matt did for Harry Potter). :-P

Sometimes I do feel like I was off by half a star up or down on some reviews when I go back and see a movie again, but such is life. I could watch this one again easily and I’ll be picking up Star Trek on Blu-ray, but Transformers I don’t ever have to watch again.

Vic

The Critic says:

@Vic

we already know you don’t like transformers 1 or 2 from your ugly review of it but do you have to bash it every single chance you get? It’s obvious you have something against Michael bay or Megan fox or us fans of the franchise.

LikeItMuch? says:

Hey is it true that G.I Joe broke John Landis’ “The Blues Brothers” record of destroying the most vehicles?? Just wondering :D

Cosmo says:

I’m positive I won’t see this “movie” because I’ve made a sacred vow not to watch any “movies” based on: remakes, toys, and/or comic books. I’m so sick of them all. I just wanted to see what you had to say about this one. And I’m glad you didn’t like the Tranformers. The whole time I watched the first movie I felt like I was being punished. God-awful acting, silly scrip, cheese through and through. I know I’m old fashion because I don’t buy into all this hyped out garbage that’s made for the teenage male market. But doesn’t Hollywood realize that mature folks have money too? Hey, I like to see end-of-the-world movies where people die and all that, but can they please have a good story and decent actors?

Totally agree 3.5 out of 5 from me. Sienna Miller was very good and I could look at Rachel Nichols all day long. Movie was fun and this could become a very solid franchise.

chuck

No “Critic” it’s not “obvious” I have something against Bay or Fox. I just don’t like those two damned movies. Have you ever heard me say anything against Bay’s other films?

I freaking hate when people try to put words in my mouth.

Vic

Panda says:

The movie was a joke. Between this and wolverine, it’s clear people are ok with violence, including exploding arrows in the eye, grenades launched at people pointblank, as there’s no blood it’s fine. But any overt sexual humor is just plain wrong? Get over it and have the talk with kid already. At least TF didn’t have a fraction of the bodycount of this PG13 flick.

GI Joes script was terrible and the acting from nearly everyone (save 2 or 3), made megan fox look like Maryl Streep. I seriously can’t believe 3.5. What a joke

Tweeb says:

GI Joe was AWESOME. And I say that as a ‘chick’. It had a lot of action, the acting left something to be desired, but it wasn’t as bad as say…the left behind series movies (ugh!).

I wasn’t into GI Joe as a kid and went with my hubby to see it and we both loved it.

Patrick Dempsey says:

@vic

is it just me or did you originally rate this a 3.5 and now it is a 3, either way your review is absolutely spot on, oscar worthy certainly not, but everything that a popcorn flick should be, and what transformers 2 should have been.

Michael says:

YO JOE! This movie was FANTASTIC.

J says:

What I liked best about it was the cleverness factor; Cobra’s leadership and its plots were just brilliant about the things they did which will obviously lead to a sequel. I wondered if the director had directed the Mummy due to the large Mummy alumni presence, but I loved the Mummy, so I enjoyed that. Other good things were the fight scenes, even beyond the obligatory Snake Eyes/Storm Shadow ones; a certain fight in the Pitt comes to mind. Baroness was good, Destro was good, the “Doctor” was an annoying let down after a little while. A movie to define Western Civilization as we know it? No. A movie that is enjoyable? Yes.

The only weak factor I took away from the film was Channing as Duke. I think there are many more powerful evocative actors in Hollywood that would have hit the mark for Duke. Channing seems just – asleep in front of the camera, doesn’t he?

joel says:

whoever liked this movie is easily entertained and has no place being a movie critic/reviewer.

Tweeb says:

@ joel… You were supposed to review the movie, not the comments. That is hardly fair not leaving your review and lashing out at the reviewers. At least validate your remarks.

Mark says:

My God, this “movie” was just completely awful from start to finish.

swigmonkey says:

Not a bad movie, better adaptation than the Transformers films. Those are absolutely the stupidest piles to hit the big screen. My only real concern is if it is left at a single movie and not a trilogy it will be considered a total waste to me. It has the makings of a decent series, nothing super amazing, but good enough for me to want to watch more.

I think you rated it fairly. On the Megan Fox, she is a horrible actress, and that whole movie stunk. All M.B. had to do was make the constructicons actually transform to form devastator and it may have been enough, instead he looked like some stupid monkey-insectoid creature. Not to mention since when do humans hurt robots? I can not think of ONE television series for transformers that has that happen(headmasters doesn’t count..)

MCat says:

If transformers is such crap why does every movie get compared to it. Talk about the movie at hand unless you’re a closet transfan.

twistedburton says:

I’m so glad you liked this movie. I loved it too! I mean of course it’s not Oscar material… but what do you expect? You just go in there to have a fun time at the theater and that’s what you come out with. Any news on a sequel? The end kind of left me hanging… I won’t spoil it.

Page 3 of 3«123
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.