‘G.I. Joe: Retaliation’: The Real Reason for the Delay

11 months ago by  

The real reason for GI Joes delay

Last week Paramount Pictures announced that it was delaying the release of G.I. Joe: Retaliation. The action sequel was shifted from its June 29, 2012 launch to March 29, 2013 because the studio wanted to ‘spend extra time converting the film into 3D’. The reason given for the 3D conversion was that the lucrative ticket price could maximise foreign box office revenue and make the film more profitable.

It seemed odd that a studio would pull such a big film just five weeks before it was set to open, and then wait another nine months before it hit screens. Well, not surprisingly the 3D conversion isn’t the real reason for G.I. Joe: Retaliation‘s delay. Not by a long shot. Scroll down for the real story.

WARNING: SPOILERS FOR (THE OLD VERSION OF) G.I. JOE 2!

Deadline is reporting that G.I. Joe: Retaliation received scores in test screenings that ranged from “mediocre to bad”, and that the one shining light for the film was the relationship between Channing Tatum and Dwayne Johnson. There was just one tiny problem: Tatum’s character was killed off in the opening minutes of the film. The decision was made to delay the release, arrange a week of reshoots expanding Tatum’s role, and then convert the film into 3D.

Apparently, Paramount didn’t see Channing Tatum as a viable star for the sequel to their 2009 film – hence the reason that Retaliation is toplined by Dwayne Johnson and Bruce Willis. However, Tatum is now a box office draw following the one-two hit combo of The Vow and 21 Jump Street. That Tatum’s role in Retaliation will be expanded must be good news for his fans and his agent, who must have been able to negotiate a steep fee for the actor’s return.

This line of reasoning still equates the release delay to the cash-grab attempt so many fans saw it as. Hasbro (the toy company that owns G.I. Joe) already suffered the U.S. box office failure of Battleship, and G.I. Joe 2 would’ve been quickly overshadowed by The Amazing Spider-Man (which comes out a week after G.I. Joe 2‘s original release date). With this delay, the studio and toy company are clearly doing everything they can to secure some kind of profits from this venture.

Channing Tatum as Duke

Deadline writes that G.I. Joe: Retaliation’s director Jon M. Chu was ‘shellshocked’ by the news of the release date move (and presumably the reshoots), so it looks like he wasn’t part of the decision making process to change the film at this late stage. Paramount states the added cost of the new work to Joe will be $5 million, and that the budget of the film ‘should stay under $130 million’. This is something of a naive figure, when you take into account how much it must have cost to regroup the production for a week’s filming – and that a decent 3D conversion costs around $10-15 million. On top of this you have the added expense of creating a new marketing campaign for the film, and figuring out what needs to be done with the merchandise for a film that was scheduled to hit screens in the coming weeks.

This trouble for G.I. Joe: Retaliation has a similar parallel to the rumors in 2009 that stated G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra director Stephen Sommers was fired from post-production by Paramount after test screenings for that film resulted in the lowest scores in the studio’s history. Those rumors were shot down (but weren’t completely eradicated, given the film’s lukewarm reception); however, things look a lot worse for G.I. Joe: Retaliation.

G.I. Joe: Retaliation will be released on March 29th, 2013. Hopefully.

Source: Deadline

Tags: gi joe, gi joe 2

"Follow us if you want to live."

172 Comments

Post a Comment

  1. Maybe venting to the powers-that-be is just what should be done. Do they know through the “buzz” that people aren’t happy with killing off Duke. Personally I don’t think they care. They got their desired reaction. shocker Duke is dead or is he?

  2. i hate to break it to everyone but duke isnt coming back. when the 3 of them got out of the well you see the roc stand over dukes dead body and pull his dog tag off. and then later shows bruce willis the bag of dog tags they pulled off the entire team at the sand spot proving everyone there was more then dead they were deader then dead and not coming back to life.

  3. Drain-the-bathtub “the Rock” is a crappy actor and couldn’t act his way out of a paper back if it were cut down the middle and laid out flat. Bruce couldn’t give him directions off the bag, either.

    The ONLY saving grace for this movie was the actor they got to play Channing-Tatum-lite, DJ Cotrona.

  4. I am an Indian and huge fan of ROCK, About Movie : Unbelievable stunts,every thing explodes, totally action packed 2 hours of pure violence. But needed some more refinement as first part. The new technology like that “fly” bombs. They were a serious delight for the action watching eyes.A very good action movie after a very long time. But “first part is always the best” is the law i will apply to this one. Acting was superb by Dwayne and the all and all starcast did a very fine job. pls visit sociosquare for digital media services India

  5. I am an Indian and huge fan of ROCK, About Movie : Unbelievable stunts,every thing explodes, totally action packed 2 hours of pure violence. But needed some more refinement as first part. The new technology like that “fly” bombs. They were a serious delight for the action watching eyes.A very good action movie after a very long time. But “first part is always the best” is the law i will apply to this one. Acting was superb by Dwayne and the all and all starcast did a very fine job. pls visit sociosquare.com for digital media services India

  6. Unbelievable stunts,every thing explodes, totally action packed 2 hours of pure violence. But needed some more refinement as first part. The new technology like that “fly” bombs. They were a serious delight for the action watching eyes.A very good action movie after a very long time. But “first part is always the best” is the law i will apply to this one. Acting was superb by Dwayne and the all and all starcast did a very fine job. pls indian comedy show tarak mehta episodes online on dittotv.com.

  7. Good movie but lost several viewers once Duke died. Bring back Duke. You was able to bring back the white ninja without explanation so I know you can’t bring back Duke

  8. I don’t get why they’d kill off the best character in the movie. Poor decision. Like someone mentioned they brought back the white ninja guy with literally no explanation, and his death in the first movie wasn’t exactly something you come back from.

    First one was definitely better, this one is just so poorly written, it’s pathetic.

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.