Ivan Reitman Addresses ‘Ghostbusters 3′ Rumors

Published 3 years ago by

Ivan Reitman talks Ghostbusters 3 Ivan Reitman Addresses Ghostbusters 3 Rumors

The success rate of belated movie sequels really does not bode well for the quality of the perennially delayed Ghostbusters 3. The second sequel in the popular horror-comedy series is still looking to become a reality soon, as franchise writer/star Dan Aykroyd has confirmed that casting for the pic is indeed underway.

Now Ghosbusters 1 & 2 helmer Ivan Reitman has also spoken out about Ghostbusters 3 and dismissed much of the online rumor mongering about behind-the-scenes drama involving Bill Murray, as well as some of the potential plot points in the threequel (sort of…).

Reitman’s latest directorial effort, the risque rom-com No Strings Attached, will reach theaters in less than two weeks and Coming Soon sat down with the filmmaker to chat about that Ashton Kutcher/Natalie Portman flick – as well as Ghostbusters 3, naturally. While in the past Billy Murray has been vocal about his increasing lack of enthusiasm for the project, Reitman told CS matter-of-factly that “[Murray] hasn’t read [the 'Ghostbusters 3' script]… He’s never read anything. And I just sent [the screenplay] to him. So we’ll see…”

The comedic director went on to clarify that in fact “there is almost nothing that is accurate online about ['Ghosbusters 3'].” CS did mention the long-standing rumor about the condition of Murray’s Dr. Peter Venkman in the third Ghostbusters venture – and, admittedly, Reitman did not flat out deny the idea, but did nothing to suggest that it was accurate either.

He did reiterate Aykroyd’s claims about the project, saying that “all the original ['Ghostbusters'] characters have parts. As well as a whole bunch of new characters… it’s got a really good story, this one. Maybe the best of the whole series. I hope we get to do it.”

Ghostbusters 3 Casting Call for L.A. and Chicago actors Ivan Reitman Addresses Ghostbusters 3 Rumors

Ghostbusters was a massive box office success when it hit theaters back in 1984 and is still lauded for its ingenious mix of witty banter between its leads (especially Aykroyd, Murray, and co-writer Harold Ramis), clever visual F/X, and a screenplay that combines elements of both the comedy and supernatural horror genre – along with some romance between Murray and Signourney Weaver.

While Ghostbusters 2 was less of both a critical and financial hit when it arrived five years later, the sequel sat well enough with fans to keep the franchise alive. A third entry in the series has been in the making for over two decades now and looks to claw its way out of development hell at last – but will this be the next Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull or a belated sequel that actually bucks the trend and proves to be worth the wait?

It’s really more a question of quality and not one of box office potential for now. There’s definitely an audience willing to pay the ticket price (even the 3D surcharge, if necessary) to see their favorite old-school comedians don proton packs on the big screen again. Now the concern is finding out if Ghostbusters 3 proves to be worth the price of admission.

Sony Pictures indicated in its casting call for the film that Ghostbusters 3 could potentially begin production by this spring, with a late 2012 release date in mind. Keep an eye out for more news on the project over the next few months.

Source: Coming Soon

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: ghostbusters, ghostbusters 3

12 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. Ugh, it’s official, I’m not believing anything ’til I see a teaser trailer.

    I also seriously doubt it would be the best of the series, but you really can’t top the first film IMO.

  2. Why does everybody lash out at Indy 4? I liked it. I’ve seen all the films and the 4th held the same ingredients (probably better to leave out the aliens, but I’m still a fan of the 50′s aliens) and was enjoyable to me.

    • the ending i think is what pushed people to the hate side, the movie in general was good up until they brought in the aliens and that huge spaceship. it showed that the clowns behind the story got bored towards the end and decided to rush things so they could get it over and done with.

      • Well maybe. But still was a pretty darn well made film. Take away what you just said it was a great film in my eyes.

      • Much agreed. 90% of the movie was classic indy but the aliens just kind of ruined things … I mean that’s han solo’s specialty not indiana jones!

        • Ha! Good one.

    • I liked Crystal Skull as well, it’s got some great sequences. I watched it with my little brothers and sister recently and they absolutely loved it. Sometimes it’s easy to forget that these films are not neccessarily being made with us in mind.
      Same goes for the Star Wars prequels. Kids love em.

      • I’m always finding myself sticking up for Indy 4.It feels like an Indy movie to me and thats mainly due to Harrison Ford. There are a few parts that make me cringe, but on the whole, it sits proudly alongside the first three on my Dvd shelf. I was delighted to have a new Indy movie too to be honest. The same I hope will be true of Ghostbusters 3. It does’nt need to as good as the first, just good.

  3. I just got the Ghostbusters game, and it’s damn good stuff, very very funny. And Bill Murray agreed to that.
    There is a chance, if this gets made, that it will be good.

    Also, I like Ghostbusters 2, sure it’s not half as good as the first film but its still fun. I used to have nightmares about Viggo The Carpathian. Scary fella.

  4. I am torn. A Ghostbusters movie without Sigourney Weaver, I would be FINE with. This isn’t Alien or anything …In my opinion she was the downfall of Ghostbuster 2. In the first one she was the hot babe with the freaky apartment…The sexual tension between her and Venkman was hilarious! In the sequel she was Peter’s bitchy ex girlfriend slash single mom —-CRAPPY!!! Peter should have moved on to another woman and been done with it. Don’t get me wrong here, I mean… “Long Live Ripley!” But Dana Barrett at age 61? No thanks.

  5. Ivan Reitman looks an awful lot like Toby from The Office… Wouldn’t you say?

  6. Ghostbusters is an all time classic. I hope all the originals are in all of the new movie with only some help from the new actors. I know that Murray, Aykroyd, Ramis, and Hudson are a lot older than when they originally played their characters, but they are all still great.

    I love Ghostbusters, and I am glad they are sticking with the original actors, writers, and director instead of rebooting it like so many movies today.

    Go, Go Ghostbusters!!!