Nicolas Cage Not Returning for Ghost Rider 2?

Published 5 years ago by

ghost rider 2 Nicolas Cage Not Returning for Ghost Rider 2?

Nicolas Cage may not be returning for Ghost Rider 2.

Vulture reports that, due to a time limit on the rights to the Ghost Rider character, Sony may move forward without Cage – though the actor continues to express a lot of interest in the sequel. Recently, he shared ideas for where the next film should take the title character.

Inside sources are reporting a November 14, 2010 deadline on the rights. Which means that if production hasn’t started on Ghost Rider 2 by that time – then the rights revert back to Marvel (and subsequentally their new owner, Disney).

Columbia Pictures has asked Marvel for an extension on the deadline – but isn’t likely to get one. Apparently the main delay is pinning Cage down. Meaning Columbia is struggling to get the actor to commit to the sequel over another project that might offer a bigger paycheck – namely National Treasure 3 (coincidentally a Disney franchise).

Perhaps Disney is interested in recouping the Ghost Rider rights – maybe they’ll dangle a hefty paycheck in front of Cage for National Treasure 3 in order to make sure he doesn’t do Ghost Rider 2 whilst the rights are still at Columbia.

Wouldn’t that be a sneaky move?

Nicolas Cage might not return at Ghost Rider Nicolas Cage Not Returning for Ghost Rider 2?

Who should play Ghost Rider – if not Nicolas Cage?

It’s also worth mentioning that we could still see Cage as Ghost Rider even if Columbia loses the rights and they revert back to Mavel/Disney. Since Disney has worked with Cage on both National Treasure movies (and likely the third) then it’s certainly not a stretch to imagine they’d ask him to star in the Ghost Rider sequel – if they get their hands on the rights.

Having said that, Sony (Columbia) desperately needs a tentpole blockbuster for 2011 since the Spider-Man reboot is now set for 2012. Although the first Ghost Rider didn’t break any box office records or garner much critical success, it still made $230 million (double its production budget) – so it’s still possible they could offer Cage a hefty paycheck of their own.

Neither Eva Mendes (much to the dismay of many teenage boys) or Mark Steven Johnson, the director of the first movie, will be returning, which calls into question – exactly what direction will the Ghost Rider franchise be headed?

nicolas cage bangkok dangerous Nicolas Cage Not Returning for Ghost Rider 2?

Decisions, decisions…

Fans of the Ghost Rider character weren’t totally sold on Cage in the first place – and presented numerous actors who might have been a better fit. But, to the general movie going audience, isn’t the character automatically associated with Cage?

If they bring out a direct sequel, with another actor, a lot of people will have confused faces. It’s not the same as the Hulk franchise reboot – which was a clear reboot with a new actor, new director, new everything (just about) so that uninformed movie-goers could more easily accept losing Eric Bana.

Although producer Mike De Luca has said that Ghost Rider 2 will be like “pushing the reset button”, the film is still expected to be a direct successor – and not an all out reboot of the franchise.

Or would it? Maybe Nicolas Cage isn’t the only factor holding up production of Ghost Rider 2. There are certainly conflicting messages about the direction of the project as a whole.

ghost rider 2 nicolas cage Nicolas Cage Not Returning for Ghost Rider 2?

I’m probably not the only one who thought Ghost Rider was a huge disappointment (to put it mildly) and how much or how little Cage contributed to that is up for debate.

Would I be upset if Cage didn’t return? To be honest, no. I would rather they flat out reboot it (in the same vein as the Hulk franchise) and cast another actor in the role. But that’s just me.

Would you be upset if Cage didn’t return for Ghost Rider 2? Who else would you want to see star in the leading role?

Stay tuned to Screen Rant for updates on Ghost Rider 2: Spirit of Vengeance (yes, that’s the proposed title). If Columbia goes ahead with the movie (with or without Cage) before their deadline runs out, then you could see the sequel in theaters sometime in 2011 – mostly likely the summer.

Source: Vulture

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Why do we need a GR sequel at all? The first movie sucked. I think the character works on paper, but not on film. And Cage sucked as the title character. So did Eva Mendez. I´d rather like a Daredevil sequel…

  2. Why do we need a GR sequel at all? The first movie sucked. I think the character works on paper, but not on film. And Cage sucked as the title character. So did Eva Mendez. I´d rather like a Daredevil sequel…

  3. @scapegoat1 Hey dude I agree,no sh*tequels(sequels) but it could be done right in Marvel Studio's hands. Think “Constantine” but 10 times better.

  4. When this “news” came out, I was slightly disappointed, but then I started thinking about the Ketch Ghost Rider as well. Then–?

    I'd be all for it—! I would love to see Cage come back. But if they can't, they can't. If they (Sony) wants to keep the rights, focus on the Ketch version. THEN if we are good enough to get a third film, Cage could still return as Blaze and the subtitle of the film is Spirits Of Vengeance.


  5. No no… I know fox did the FF movie. But I think it's obvious Sony would do something like that if they had to with this movie and definitely with Spider-Man.

  6. Anything without Keanu Reeves in it is ten times better than Constantine (which is a cool comic btw).

  7. I haven´t read the comics, but I liked the film. And in my oppinion, Reeves is not a bad actor. If they have to do a Ghost Rider sequel, maybe he should play Daniel Ketch (or whatever his name was)…

  8. I like him in Ghost rider. I like him in National Treasure as well. He is not a bad actor.

  9. There are some comic book characters that may be better served by being animated, like Lobo, and I think Ghost Rider might be one. To make this film like the comic would require tons of CGI. While I didn't think the first movie was all that bad, it could have been much better. Wasn't the guy who played Blackheart some American Idol contest winner or something? That was one mistake. Another were the guys who were suppose to be representation of elements? Totally lame. I didn't think Cage was all that bad nor Mendez. I wouldn't mind them returning but I think either a reboot or total animation would probably be better.

  10. One of the worst “actors” in the history of the Cinema……I would love to see GR, as long as someone, anyone plays JB. ( well except those non-actors from Twi-tripe and Hayden Christenson)

  11. Nicolas Cage is a good actor (for brama or romance) not for the ghost rider, i hate the first movie and if he comes back on the sequel i will hate as well, in my opinion they should try another actor such as Jensen Ackles, Thomas Jane or even Ben Affleck will be better than Cage.

  12. idk to me i think blaze is better than ketch it would be gay if it was about ketch and not blaze they are two different riders. and eh nick cage or not just make a badass gostrider movie

  13. i think it would be sick if they made a sereies of ghost rider but no ketch screw that guy. i have read the comics and the ones with ketch are hella gay. and screw dare devil G.R would whoop em

  14. i have a ghost rider game it is awesome.

  15. I like him very much “Nicholas cage”
    He is unique actor