‘Footloose’ Review

Published 2 years ago by

Footloose Remake Review Footloose Review

Screen Rant’s Ben Kendrick reviews Footloose

These days, there’s no shortage of ’80s remakes in Hollywood, but very few of these films succeed in recreating their respective campy premises while managing to keep a straight face. Plenty of remakes attempt to be “modern” or “gritty” but within the first five minutes of Craig Brewer’s Footloose, it’s apparent that the director isn’t simply aiming to cash in on Kevin Bacon’s iconic role as rebellious dancer hunk, Ren McCormack – he’s attempting to turn the campy premise inside out and present a film that offers more than just entertaining choreography and sexy scenery (though there is still an over-abundance of the the latter).

After all, there’s a pretty large range of material between the hammy premise of a town where dancing is outlawed and story beats that directly tackle physical and emotional violence. Does the director find a successful balance that brings out the charm of the original Footloose to a modern audience, while also addressing the film’s more emotionally intense subject material?

Fortunately Brewer gets more right than he gets wrong – and while Footloose may still be an unneeded remake, with a few key problems that hold it back, the film manages to offer some genuinely entertaining as well as touching moments. That said, Brewer’s Footloose is exactly what most moviegoers are going to expect, based on their experience with either the original film, or the remake’s melodramatic (and dance-heavy) marketing – so anyone looking for a hard-hitting character drama or over-the-top dance movie will probably be less impressed by the final product. However, for moviegoers that are open to an on-the-nose teenage drama (with a couple surprisingly genuine performances) that features a number of campy dance sequences and musical montages, Footloose actually delivers.

Footloose Kenny Wormald Julianne Hough Footloose Review

Kenny Wormald and Julianne Hough in 'Footloose'

The story is still a major challenge that the filmmakers had to overcome – given that the premise is especially hard to justify in a “modern” setting (where parents have much worse things to worry about than dancing and loud music). Following a drunk driving accident that leaves five youths dead, the town of Bomont – led by Reverend Shaw Moore (Dennis Quaid) – outlaws a number of social activities (drinking, rock music, and public dancing, among others) in an attempt to “protect” their young people. New guy Ren McCormack (Kenny Wormald) arrives in town from Boston to stay with his Aunt and Uncle after his mother dies, only to discover the strict code of living in Bomont. Trying to find his place in the repressed town, McCormack strikes up an interest in Ariel Moore (Julianne Hough), the Reverend’s daughter – he also finds himself at odds with alpha-dog Chuck Cranston (Patrick John Flueger), and a community that has become increasingly crippled by their fears.

Surprisingly, Brewer succeeds in making the town of Bomont a believable place – which, as mentioned, is a tough task, given the film’s premise. This success is largely due to an interesting juxtaposition between Quaid’s Reverend Moore and McCormack’s uncle, Wes Warnicker (Ray McKinnon) – characters that could have merely been reduced to caricature, in order to show the divergent viewpoints of Bomont’s adults. Instead, while the characters represent different attitudes about McCormack’s challenge of the status quo, the actors bring actual depth to their respective roles and, as a result, flesh out the believability of the sometimes ridiculous onscreen conversations and situations. On a similar note, the townspeople of Bomont (such as the principle and other community leaders) are a little more robust this round – instead of falling into witless parodies by the end.

The stable of teen actors are all surprisingly competent, with leads Wormald and Hough successfully conveying complicated emotions in a few especially challenging moments, as well as making several of the “dance-it-out” scenes believable enough – or, at the very least, enjoyable to watch (such as one that features a full gymnastics routine in a warehouse). The supporting cast is equally well-conceived and genuine, with characters such as Willard (Miles Teller) and Woody (Ser’Darius Blain) delivering fun counterpoints to McCormack’s fish-out-of-water routine – as well as contributing to the overarching plot in subtle and enjoyable ways.

Footloose Dancing Footloose Review

A bigger, badder, 'Footloose' now with more breakdancing.

As mentioned, the film successfully tackles various character motivations (no matter how absurd) with an impressive amount of care and depth – however, stylistically, Brewer’s Footloose is often at odds with its more noble story intentions. On several occasions, legitimate drama is undermined by unnecessary and gratuitous sex appeal that makes Michael Bay’s approach to female objectification look prudish. It’s clear that Brewer attempted to showcase the vitality of these young people in relation to their repressed and worry-obsessed community – but, after several close-up shots that frame the exposed hips and gyrating mid-drifts of Bomont High School ladies, it’s clear the filmmakers were just as focused on titillating the MTV generation as they were telling a meaningful story. The waffling focus on sex appeal doesn’t entirely undermine the film’s substance but can, at times, make for an awkward balance when the movie suddenly shifts gears and jumps head-long into mature character drama.

Similarly, as the film roles into the third act, the resulting plot points become a mix of sharp character realizations (McCormack’s appeal to the community) and completely unearned “lets put a bow on it” catharsis (which is most apparent in the conclusion to the Chuck Cranston story arc). The less-successful moments of closure aren’t enough to drag down the more interesting aspects of the film’s finale – but there’s no doubt that moviegoers will consider some of elements of the denouement to be “tacked-on.” But, as mentioned earlier, the Footloose remake actually finds an improved moment for emotional climax and plot realization when compared to the original (which devolves into a cartoony draw-down), but is still relatively jumbled and potentially anticlimactic.

Brewer’s Footloose remake may not live up to the lasting iconography of the original film, and, in the grand scheme of cinema, will likely be little more than a quick and sexy flash in the pan. Moviegoers who are interested in the basic premise will find plenty of exciting choreography and enough intriguing character drama to make a trip to the theater worthwhile – but for anyone who had little interest in the Footloose remake to begin with, it’s unlikely that Brewer’s interpretation will overcome that skepticism.

If you’re still on the fence about Footloose, check out the trailer below:

-

[poll id="203"]

-

Follow me on Twitter @benkendrick - and let us know what you thought of the film below:

Footloose is now in theaters.

Our Rating:

3 out of 5
(Good)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: footloose

15 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. I think this review is pretty generous. The performances were paper thin and the dancing left much to be desired. I think people are forgetting that the original was not very good on its own and the remake treated the script like a mad-lib, filling in new pop culture references where necessary. I did not find any of these “genuinely entertaining” or “touching” moments that you mention.

    • Alex –

      A 3/5 is hardly a glowing recommendation here at SR. Plus, the film is doing well on most review aggregates.

      I don’t blame anyone for thinking the film falls short but it’s significantly better than it could have been, in my opinion.

      I think this line best sums up my sentiments: “Brewer’s Footloose is exactly what most moviegoers are going to expect, based on their experience with either the original film, or the remake’s melodramatic (and dance-heavy) marketing – so anyone looking for a hard-hitting character drama or over-the-top dance movie will probably be less impressed by the final product.”

  2. No more remakes!

    • I have to agree….As if the original “Footloose” was corny enough….not to mention a complete lack of originality that seems to exist now in Hollywood with the plythra of remakes. The sad part is that there are some folks out there that don’t know this is a remake…..

  3. Julianne Hough is really gorgeous and very talented. It’s an incredible performance by her in Footloose, just wonderful.

  4. Thats why i stick to the originals.

  5. From what I saw non of the actors were bad and non were great, I wouldn’t pay to see any of these actors in another film. They are dancers and tho they hold there own in this film I don’t know if they would in others

  6. The original was forgettable and almost forgotten what were they thinking remaking a blah movie from the 80′s

    • I disagree that the original was “forgettable”. It was fun which is what was intended. Of course to remake a fun classic because you can’t think of anything better to do is simply L A M E.

  7. The original was not very good but the sound track was awesome!!! I missed Kevin Bacon and of coarse Kenny Loggins huge hit “Footloose” which became an anthem the summer of 1984. The young man in the lead in the remark is VERY handsome! Juliane Hough turn’s out another lack luster performance. Best to go back to “DWTS” sweety. Many young actors passed on the role for the up-dated Footloose film including Zak Efron of High School musical fame. That was a mistake because he had a hit film since 2006 and his last High School musical film.

  8. The lead actor in this movie is actually a very talented dancer in “real” life

  9. Kevin Bacon rules. Movie was fun, but you just can not beat Kevin Bacon is the role. I liked Juliane \, but other characters not as believeable as the first movie. Gotta go with the original

  10. I’m sorry, this movie was horrible. I personally loved the original version. But for anyone who is current on today’s dance moves, the main actor destroys any semblance of even “good” dancing. Also, the over the top booty shaking by the girls in this film discredits everything that America’s Best Dance Crew and the plethora of recent dance movies have done for this genre. Bottom line, acting…ok but dancing…horrific. You can find dancers in any nightclub who can dance better than these people.

    • I just went back and re-watched the dance scenes. The first dance scene turned me off so bad, I gave up immediately. However, the line dancing was good and the prom scene made the movie fairly enjoyable. I hate to see that the “black” dancers couldn’t even dance though……kind of expected for a Hollywood wannabe “Blockbuster”. Also, why does one of the black guys still have a Kid N Play haircut? That was so 90′s (especially in a movie where the main character sports an iPod!)

  11. I liked the movie but the dance in the abandon warehouse where he is taking out steam….was weak. The music selection in the remake for that scene was horrible. They could have done better on that one scene.

Be Social, Follow Us!!