Comments on: New Trailer For ‘Fast & Furious’ Disappointing

By: Jesse Bales

Jesse Bales — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:06:03 +0000

Now I agree that Trailer 2 was a little 007, but that won’t stop me from seeing what is best referred to as a kick ass guy movie. Despite my attitude towards Paul Walker. I’m sorry if I upset anyone.

By: s2k

s2k — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:12:58 +0000

ken J,

stick to the subject which is the MOVIE, who cares about your driving or subaru’s designs lol

i cant wait for this movie, stunts are awesome and im hoping its not the last from the francise

By: Skope

Skope — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:51:40 +0000

I don’t like Soulja Boy either but it still looks REALLY good.

By: Skope

Skope — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:51:02 +0000

The second trailer was even better, I don’t see what’s so bad about it.

By: BigDaddy

BigDaddy — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:31:21 +0000

The trailers look great. So what if its got Soulja Bitch in it the movie will still be the bomb

By: BJ

BJ — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:56:52 +0000

o yea trailer not bad if u mute the volume lol

By: BJ

BJ — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:55:53 +0000

So what they didn’t have Vin in the second movie and a camo in the 3rd. He turned down the second,, so thats him.

First movie was ok Special effects were crap they really didnt drive much.good story.

Second was ok still didn’t drive much either but moive was ok story was crap

third one wasnt bad it was more about the Drift it was cool to see transition on the main character and his rival. I drift myself so as a racer i liked how the brought a lil more of the street racer world into this then the last 2

By: John "Kahless" Taylor

John "Kahless" Taylor — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:21:28 +0000

@Ken
Yeah, drifting definitely wears the tires down fast, but these are movies, not real life; when I go to the movies, I go to be entertained, but that’s just me.

I just watched the new trailer again with the sound on (I had to pause House). I still think the trailer was OK; not as good as the first one but OK.

By: Jess H.

Jess H. — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:20:31 +0000

I didnt mind either trailers. I thought they looked pretty good and it is getting me excited for the new Fast and Furious. The first one was good, I didnt see the 2nd and I thought Tokyo Drift was still pretty good. All in all I have never really been disappointed with the Fast and Furious movies, they have always been entertaing to me and im looking forward to this one.

By: Metallicat79

Metallicat79 — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:40:29 +0000

I quite enjoyed the new trailer, it gave you something you were not expecting, when you go to watch it you are expecting cars and cars and Vin Diesel. But instead you get a really cool foot pursuit, I don’t know about anyone else, but that worked for me. The Tanker thing may push the boundry a little for me.

I really enjoyed the first one, espcially the Charger at the end!
The second one seemed like a rip off of some other movie i have seen before, though I Can’t remember.
I like the third, it actaully surprised me, in that it was not compete and utter garbage like I had intilially written it off to be. Definetly worth a watch.

By: Ken J

Ken J — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:35:31 +0000

Riddick is definitely Vin Diesel’s role…

The concept of running an entire drawn out race drifting is pretty ridiculous. They burn through an entire tire within a quarter mile course in real life. Or actually 8th of a mile I think… This isn’t Initial D, it’s real life, with real physics, rubber wears down fast.

Correct me if I’m wrong, I am not a fan of drifting so I don’t actively watch it, but that’s my understanding of it, I see them burning through the entire tire running the course once.

By: Tammi

Tammi — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:37:45 +0000

I would have to say the first one was better. The 2nd one even though it was a cat and mouse beginning was a bit slow. Hopefully they’ll run the first one if it is going to shown during the SuperBowl instead of the 2nd one.

By: John "Kahless" Taylor

John "Kahless" Taylor — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:18:16 +0000

I don’t know, the new trailer looked fine to me; of course, I’m at work and the sound is off, so I’ll reserve final judgement till I hear it.

I liked the first 2 (the first one more than the 2nd) and only the drifting in the third. Vin needs to work on another Riddick movie.

By: Jason Charles

Jason Charles — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:45:59 +0000

Mr. Ken J,

You are right but in the end it’s just a movie.

By: Bill Blume

Bill Blume — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:27:51 +0000

I’ve never been a big fan of the series. Saw some of the first film, but never the entire thing. The first film seemed more grounded in its action, though. The bouncing tanker… that just seems goofy… and (pardon the pun) over the top.

By: Brodie

Brodie — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:13:45 +0000

I think the first trailer plays more to fans of the original. The second is clearly more focusing on what the new movie is about. As a fan of the original, and only the original, I have to say both trailers have me pretty excited.

By: Ken J

Ken J — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:49:52 +0000

Now if only Subaru can build cars that are fast AND not ugly as hell at the same time… Have you seen their Tribeca or whatever it’s called? I mean, seriously, what were they thinking?? Someone on their design team needs to be fired…

By: Psyko

Psyko — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:43:57 +0000

I like the first one, didn’t see the second, tolerated the third and will watch this one simply for the STI. I swear though, as soon as they destroy that car I’m writing the movie off forever.

By: Ken J

Ken J — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:04:31 +0000

I just have to wonder how that tanker bounced so many times while it tumbled. You would think that energy is dissipated, not gained…

By: aGeneral

aGeneral — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:16:38 +0000

@Dave

The first was a good remake of “Point Break”, just replace the surf boards with cars and you get the same movie.

The second was crap, just another sequel with no thought put in it.

The third was awesome they took something that is popular but unknown and developed a plausible and creative story around the versatility of the car world, and Vin being at the end ties in with this movie.

—————————————

This trailer would be very well done if there was more relevant and unknown music.

The trailer “visually” was great, it explained the plot of the film (Which most trailers don’t) and it showed glimpses of action, but not to much, The Trailer with better music would be much better to watch.