<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fantastic Four 2: Galactus In But Not Yet Designed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-vic-585/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-vic-585/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: jogan</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-vic-585/comment-page-1/#comment-3538</link>
		<dc:creator>jogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 04:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-585/#comment-3538</guid>
		<description>What concerns me about the sequel is the actual height of Galactus. Now! Galactus destroys worlds for its abundance of energy. In the comic books hes massive. After all, if he really is the &quot;Devourer of Worlds&quot; what would be his actual height as portrait in the comic!!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What concerns me about the sequel is the actual height of Galactus. Now! Galactus destroys worlds for its abundance of energy. In the comic books hes massive. After all, if he really is the &#8220;Devourer of Worlds&#8221; what would be his actual height as portrait in the comic!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-vic-585/comment-page-1/#comment-3537</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-585/#comment-3537</guid>
		<description>Baganoth,

I certainly hope you&#039;re right!

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baganoth,</p>
<p>I certainly hope you&#8217;re right!</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baganoth</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-vic-585/comment-page-1/#comment-3536</link>
		<dc:creator>baganoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-585/#comment-3536</guid>
		<description>i like what u say but i think it will be a great film and lets get real ff the first film was not tht fantastic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like what u say but i think it will be a great film and lets get real ff the first film was not tht fantastic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScreenWEEK.it weblog</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-vic-585/comment-page-1/#comment-3539</link>
		<dc:creator>ScreenWEEK.it weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-585/#comment-3539</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Galactus in Fantastic Four - Rise of the Silver Surfer, contrordine, forse ci sar&#224;&lt;/strong&gt;

Qualche giorno fa avevo scritto quanto ritenessi improbabile la presenza di Galactus in Fantastic Four - Rise of the Silver Surfer. Ma ScreenRant, che segue attentamente il blog del regista del film (Tim Story) su MySpace ha segnalato oggi un...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Galactus in Fantastic Four &#8211; Rise of the Silver Surfer, contrordine, forse ci sar&agrave;</strong></p>
<p>Qualche giorno fa avevo scritto quanto ritenessi improbabile la presenza di Galactus in Fantastic Four &#8211; Rise of the Silver Surfer. Ma ScreenRant, che segue attentamente il blog del regista del film (Tim Story) su MySpace ha segnalato oggi un&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-vic-585/comment-page-1/#comment-3535</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-585/#comment-3535</guid>
		<description>Thanks bud, I appreciate that. :-)

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks bud, I appreciate that. <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smitty</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-vic-585/comment-page-1/#comment-3534</link>
		<dc:creator>Smitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/fantastic-four-2-galactus-in-but-not-yet-designed-585/#comment-3534</guid>
		<description>Weak is not the word for the original FF, lets not go there.  The FF sequel looks to follow X-men 2 in the fact that it will totally overshadow the orig. or at least let’s hope so.  Thanks for being out there Vic and Brian, I always look forward to reading what you guys have to say.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weak is not the word for the original FF, lets not go there.  The FF sequel looks to follow X-men 2 in the fact that it will totally overshadow the orig. or at least let’s hope so.  Thanks for being out there Vic and Brian, I always look forward to reading what you guys have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

