<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enter The Dragon Remake? Well&#8230; Sort Of But Not Really</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Ninja Assassin&#8217;s&#8217; Rain To &#8216;Awaken The Dragon?&#8217; - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-116948</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Ninja Assassin&#8217;s&#8217; Rain To &#8216;Awaken The Dragon?&#8217; - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-116948</guid>
		<description>[...] 1973 Bruce Lee classic, Enter The Dragon. Screen Rant reported on this &#8220;sort of&#8221; remake almost two years ago, and much of the details remain the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1973 Bruce Lee classic, Enter The Dragon. Screen Rant reported on this &#8220;sort of&#8221; remake almost two years ago, and much of the details remain the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pit Bull</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-17254</link>
		<dc:creator>Pit Bull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-17254</guid>
		<description>Well I just heard about this and I agree they should leave &quot;ETD&quot; alone but if they get Tony Jaa to star in the lead role this movie will be great...well maybe not lol but at least the fighting will be great!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I just heard about this and I agree they should leave &#8220;ETD&#8221; alone but if they get Tony Jaa to star in the lead role this movie will be great&#8230;well maybe not lol but at least the fighting will be great!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quicksilver</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5290</link>
		<dc:creator>Quicksilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5290</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m a big bruce lee fan, and me and brother, during the 80s, would tape many of lee&#039;s kung fu classics (when the vhs, not vcr, was king of entertainment).  and to take you guys further back, i remember when his movies would come on sundays on fox 5 and fox would call that segment &quot;the drive in.&quot;

i do agree that they should leave this film alone.  if you want to make an excellent kung fu flick, which hasn&#039;t been scene in ,ugh....30yrs, be original about it, and don&#039;t try to ride the coattails of a classic contender.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m a big bruce lee fan, and me and brother, during the 80s, would tape many of lee&#8217;s kung fu classics (when the vhs, not vcr, was king of entertainment).  and to take you guys further back, i remember when his movies would come on sundays on fox 5 and fox would call that segment &#8220;the drive in.&#8221;</p>
<p>i do agree that they should leave this film alone.  if you want to make an excellent kung fu flick, which hasn&#8217;t been scene in ,ugh&#8230;.30yrs, be original about it, and don&#8217;t try to ride the coattails of a classic contender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5289</link>
		<dc:creator>Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5289</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

EXACTLY. It&#039;s a common practice in Hollywood to take and existing well known film and grab the title to just for the name recognition aspect. Often the new version can have very little resemblance to the original, but the name brings people to the theater (at least on opening weekend).

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>EXACTLY. It&#8217;s a common practice in Hollywood to take and existing well known film and grab the title to just for the name recognition aspect. Often the new version can have very little resemblance to the original, but the name brings people to the theater (at least on opening weekend).</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Gimbert</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5288</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Gimbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5288</guid>
		<description>So if it&#039;s not really a remake are they just saying it is to get it some attention?

Either way I can&#039;t see it being good.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if it&#8217;s not really a remake are they just saying it is to get it some attention?</p>
<p>Either way I can&#8217;t see it being good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GClem</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5287</link>
		<dc:creator>GClem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5287</guid>
		<description>Enter the Dragon was Bruce Lee&#039;s Casablance and to piss on it would be a disgrace to Bruce and the remaining live actors that made this movie. Let lying dogs lie and leave this one alone. If you plan on doing a martial arts movie fine, but to link it with a classic just to make money is a crime. As Bubba said to Fred Sanford, &quot;Do do it!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enter the Dragon was Bruce Lee&#8217;s Casablance and to piss on it would be a disgrace to Bruce and the remaining live actors that made this movie. Let lying dogs lie and leave this one alone. If you plan on doing a martial arts movie fine, but to link it with a classic just to make money is a crime. As Bubba said to Fred Sanford, &#8220;Do do it!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5286</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5286</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you. There are some movies that should just be left alone (as I have said MANY times).

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you. There are some movies that should just be left alone (as I have said MANY times).</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5285</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5285</guid>
		<description>Speaking not only as a Bruce Lee fan, but as a martial artist, I have to say I think Mr. Sutter should call this off. The odds of him pissing off the martial arts community are way to high, and they&#039;re not the kind of people you want angry with you. And there are a lot of other Bruce Lee fans out there and some of them probbably have guns. Statisticly speaking.
Movies as good as Enter The Dragon should reaally just be left alone.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking not only as a Bruce Lee fan, but as a martial artist, I have to say I think Mr. Sutter should call this off. The odds of him pissing off the martial arts community are way to high, and they&#8217;re not the kind of people you want angry with you. And there are a lot of other Bruce Lee fans out there and some of them probbably have guns. Statisticly speaking.<br />
Movies as good as Enter The Dragon should reaally just be left alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5284</link>
		<dc:creator>Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5284</guid>
		<description>From the description given for the movie I can only assume (hope?) that they get someone with some serious MA skills to play the role.

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the description given for the movie I can only assume (hope?) that they get someone with some serious MA skills to play the role.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Senn</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5283</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Senn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 05:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5283</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s gonna star in it? If it&#039;s gonna have some half-ass pretty face with no fighting background, the fight scenes are gonna look like crap no matter how many fast-cuts and wirework you use.

For instance, given Keanu Reeves&#039; lame acting in The Matrix triology, I&#039;ve always thought that Mark Dacascos would have been a better choice. He has similarly pan-Asian looks (but Dacascos looks sharper), not-so-expressive acting skills, and Dacascos has an added advantage - REAL martial arts background.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s gonna star in it? If it&#8217;s gonna have some half-ass pretty face with no fighting background, the fight scenes are gonna look like crap no matter how many fast-cuts and wirework you use.</p>
<p>For instance, given Keanu Reeves&#8217; lame acting in The Matrix triology, I&#8217;ve always thought that Mark Dacascos would have been a better choice. He has similarly pan-Asian looks (but Dacascos looks sharper), not-so-expressive acting skills, and Dacascos has an added advantage &#8211; REAL martial arts background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5282</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5282</guid>
		<description>Matt, that&#039;s true, but as PG pointed out a pretty good rule of thumb is that a good remake usually comes from a weak original source.

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, that&#8217;s true, but as PG pointed out a pretty good rule of thumb is that a good remake usually comes from a weak original source.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5281</link>
		<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5281</guid>
		<description>Being a huge Bruce Lee fan, I&#039;m not at all excited to hear about this. Enter the Dragon is a classic in it&#039;s own right. To me it&#039;s like remaking The Godfather or something like that. Remakes are good only if the original sucked. Enter the Dragon did not suck at all.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a huge Bruce Lee fan, I&#8217;m not at all excited to hear about this. Enter the Dragon is a classic in it&#8217;s own right. To me it&#8217;s like remaking The Godfather or something like that. Remakes are good only if the original sucked. Enter the Dragon did not suck at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Milam</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-vic-887/comment-page-1/#comment-5280</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Milam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/enter-the-dragon-remake-well-sort-of-but-not-really-887/#comment-5280</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Fugitive remake wasn&#039;t bad. It actually made the series better to some extent.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Fugitive remake wasn&#8217;t bad. It actually made the series better to some extent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

