Warner Bros. to Develop ‘Encyclopedia Brown’ Movie

Published 2 years ago by

Encyclopedia Brown Sobol Warner Bros. to Develop Encyclopedia Brown Movie

The current rush on young adult and adolescent-oriented book properties may be omnipresent at the moment, but it’s also nothing new. Adapted stories geared toward children and teens – from The Wizard of Oz through Harry Potter – have captured imaginations (and purse strings) since the dawn of film.

Though the majority of these adaptations have held some cultural cache in their immediate era, some properties must wait quite a long time before they see a proper translation to the big screen. A prime example of this is the Encyclopedia Brown book series – first written by Donald J. Sobol in 1963, but only now headed to theaters.

The Hollywood Reporter reports that Warner Bros. is actively pursuing a big screen adaptation of Encyclopedia Brown. Producers Roy Lee (How to Train Your Dragon) and Howard David Deutsch have begun to laying the groundwork for the movie, for which Deutsch has held the film rights to the property for well over 30 years. Despite multiple efforts to get an Encyclopedia Brown movie off the ground, the stories have seen only a single adaptation – a truncated TV series broadcast by HBO in 1989.

Written right up until the time of his death in 2012, the many books of Sobol’s series revolve around Leroy “Encyclopedia” Brown, a 10-year-old boy nicknamed for his somewhat freakish intellect. Almost all of the Brown tales take place in the fictional town of Idaville, where Encyclopedia’s father works as the local Chief of Police. Something of a celebrity among local children, Encyclopedia runs a private detective agency out of his garage along with his best friend and nominal muscle, Sally Kimball.

Encyclopedia Brown Scott Bremner Warner Bros. to Develop Encyclopedia Brown Movie

Scott Bremner as Leroy Brown in the ‘Encyclopedia Brown’ TV series.

Most of the books follow a strict formula, presenting a number of cases of fraud and hooliganism for Brown to solve. Each case is set out as a kind of elementary logic problem, encouraging readers to figure out the mystery before turning to an end note-style solution set at the back of the book.

Though the heyday of Encyclopedia Brown is somewhat past, the property could do quite well with a number of tweaks to reposition it as a combination of mystery and kid-friendly action-adventure. Since the episodic structure of each of the Brown books will obviously work well as a feature film, one must wonder what kind of approach the Deutsch and Lee will push toward. Will the eventual movie resemble a kid-oriented National Treasure – a kind of potboiler mystery-thriller for the playground set? Or will we see something more low-key and in line with the genial tone of the books?

For the moment, the eventual outcome of the Encyclopedia Brown adaptation remains (I’m so sorry) a mystery. If the adaptation gets off the ground, it could very well be one of the more interesting family-targeted properties of the next few years.


As of yet, Encyclopedia Brown does not have a definitive release date. Screen Rant will keep you informed as this particular mystery unfolds.

Source: THR

Follow Kyle Hembree on Twitter @ProjectNightHam
Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. People today won’t get the Encyclopedia reference, they will have to name him Wikipedia Brown, which means some of his information will be off depending on the day.

    • +1

    • Charlie Brown with a Thesaurus and a Dictionary.

  2. I say take a leap and set it the ’60′s when the books were written.

    • I was thinking the same. The original time period would be more interesting, and franchises dont always have to be modernized to be relevant

      • Exactly my point sir. Your comment = nail on the head.

    • That’s true. In the 21st Century, Bugs Meany wouldn’t allow Encyclopedia to keep outsmarting and Sally Kimball to keep outpunching him. He’d probably take both of them out with a gun.

  3. Baailey school kids next.

  4. ooo, maybe he will be in Justice League??

  5. Believe it or not, when I was a kid growing up I read the entire Encyclopedia (well, skimmed parts, read the rest) for my own knowlage. I was always a vociferous reader, digesting everything from high and lofty literature way beyond the typical reading level for my years to cereal boxes, and found this was a good way to pack your brain with knowlage on a whole variety of subjects (read the dictionary at Flash-skim-speed also, picking out big or interesting words, and looking up their meanings, to extend my vocabulary as well). I was even one of those guys who could not just read the one required line on the cards in Trivial Pursuit, but had to cram all the info on each card into my knowlage-devouring brain. Guess that is a little obsessive to be so driven, but I’m probably smarter than the average bear for it (“Thanx, Yogi!”).

    • Vociferous, huh? So, you were a loud, boisterous reader?

      Maybe you meant voracious, as in wanting or devouring great quantities of literature.

      Or maybe you just like to cry out noisily when you read… seems legit.

      • lol

      • +1

  6. Make him a teenager and get either the lead from Mud (Sheraton) or the lead from Flipped (McAuliffie). I also agree that they should set it in a different decade. But not the 60′s. Maybe the 80′s.

  7. A character that’s no longer relevant in today’s age. WB would be better off passing on this.

    • Yes, because everyone can just acquire the information in question on their smartphones instead of relying on the knowledge of a ten-year old kid.

      But that just doesn’t have the same effect.

  8. I love those books!