Doctor Who: ‘A Good Man Goes to War’ Review & Discussion

Published 3 years ago by

doctor who season 6 a good man goes to war Doctor Who: A Good Man Goes to War Review & Discussion

In a feat of masterful storytelling, with a plot so beautifully immense in its conception, Steven Moffat has once again elevated Doctor Who above all conceivable expectations and elegantly crafted this mid-season finale into what may be the Doctor’s greatest adventure ever presented – and that’s taking into account the highly disappointing, and completely anticipated, revelation of River Song’s true identity.

Continuing from the previous week’s two-part episode and cliffhanger, “A Good Man Goes To War” opens with Rory (Arthur Darvill), in full Centurion garb, aboard a Cybermen battleship. With dialogue and visuals reminiscent of Russell T. Davies’ tendency to overreach, one does not truly recognize the monumental importance of what is occurring until the phrase “the Doctor is calling in his debts” is uttered.

What may first appear to be a simple reclamation of past good deeds quickly turns all those watching into children with over-active imaginations. The simple notion of the Doctor (Matt Smith) – the proverbial savior of the Universe – calling upon those he saved in his 900 years of existence to help in a single event may very well be the most prodigious plot line presented in the decades of Doctor Who storytelling.

Akin to the often talked about (but never shown – on purpose) Time War, the act of the Doctor calling in his debts presents a nearly infinite array of grandiose visuals and immense possibilities. While the opening scenes present a fleet of Cybermen ships being destroyed in an instant, what is eventually presented as the Doctor “calling in debts” is nothing more than a few familiar faces from Steven Moffat’s tenure as executive producer – with a reluctant Sontaran thrown in for good measure.

doctor who amy pond1 Doctor Who: A Good Man Goes to War Review & Discussion

Even though the collected figures hardly meet the lofty imagination of anyone watching (although presenting a good argument of why the Time War should never be visually represented), the pure and unexpected notion of the Doctor “calling in his debts” serves to provide an environment of accidental repercussions that maintains the audience’s excitement throughout. With a story and execution that is both brilliant and disappointing (at times), it’s hard not to want to fault this episode, while at the same time continuously proclaiming its inclusion in the franchise’s top episodes.

With a story that serves to transition the Doctor from the Universe’s only hope, to a man that everyone should fear, the elements involving Amy (Karen Gillan) and her baby, and the revelation of River Song (Alex Kingston), often feel inferior in their presentation, even though they’re the two main and reoccurring plots. While still wonderful in its execution, there are times when convolution – even to the level that one expects with Doctor Who – begins to conflict with what appears to be important.

Continuing that sentiment comes the long-awaited revelation of River Song’s true identity. One of Russell T. Davies many wondrous creations, River Song has always stood out in both elegance and mystery. A figure important in the Doctor’s life, but one that is existing in a contrarian timeline. Since the moment that audiences were introduced to her, in her final living moments, the theory of who she is, and who she comes to be, were always present.

doctor who rory good man goes to war Doctor Who: A Good Man Goes to War Review & Discussion

Unfortunately, as Doctor Who season 6 began, those theories quickly lessened, and a more assured situation took over. As seasonal imagery and on-the-nose insinuations highlighted River Song’s only possible identity, the once great mystery quickly turned into anything but.

With a long, drawn-out, revelation that even the most inexperienced Doctor Who fan could have spotted without the given back-story, the presented situation may leave some unhappy. But for those with enough foresight to see the possibilities awaiting fans this fall, it’s hard to conclude this episode with anything but a smile.

For all its elegance, brilliance, disappointments and anticipated outcomes, the sheer scope of the episode, mixed with the numerous storytelling possibilities that await audiences when the series returns, serves to elevate this episode past all of its few downfalls.

-

Doctor Who airs on Saturdays @9pm on BBC America

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: doctor who

79 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. Have watched Doctor Who since I was little – so glad it was brought back! This season is not quite done so we don’t know the entire story line yet – the Doctor’s apparent disproportionate anger at Amy and her baby being taken may just mean he knows something we don’t. The TARDIS always brings him to where he is needed and it brought him to Amy. I can’t wait for the season to resume- this is going to be exciting!

  2. I disagree about what you said about the River Song reveal. I think it was a great although predictable reveal. Then again I think the Doctor/River and Rory/Amy relationships are the two greatest relationships in Who history (resent at least). I am loving the storylines and connecting them the way this episode did is masterful. So what if it is predictable.

  3. Just a comment about the Doctor having children or not. The Doctor “had” at least one child, and at least one grandchild. But he doesn’t “have” them anymore–they’re dead. He killed them along with the rest of the Gallifreyans during the Time War (if they were still alive at that point).

    And while he called Jenny his “daughter”, technically, she wasn’t. And he thinks she’s dead,too.

    • Thats not entirely true. The Doctor left Susan, his granddaughter, on earth in the 1960′s because she wanted to stay. So technically she could very well be alive. I often think it would be an interesting plot twist for the show to bring back a regenerated Susan, seeing how she’s is a timelord, and since its almost as if the Doctor has forgotten about her.

      • In “The Empty Child” when the doctor (no, not the Doctor, the doctor) says, “Before this war, I was a father and a grandfather. Now I am neither”, the Doctor replies, “I know the feeling”. That at the very least implies that the Doctor’s family, including Susan, are dead.

        • Yes, but implying isn’t stating fact ya know. That line could mean anything. I mean Susan was a companion and like most of the Doctor’s companions he abandons them so to speak after a while and we never hear about them. Fact is, Susan has been left for complete speculation. She may or may not be alive. That line could mean the doctors disappointment in leaving her and never going back for her. My gut says she’s alive. Plus she would be an awesome character to bring back into the series, especially if there’s a rebirth of the timelords so to speak. Plus, its Doctor Who, anything is possible. I mean there were no more timelord and yet they almost came back in Tennant’s final eps. Whose to say Susan, if she was in the time war didn’t get out then? How many times are we gonna see the master magically return? And whose to say if Susan is anything like her grandfather, that if she did go back home, wouldn’t run away like the Doctor did.
          A lot could happen. Just saying.

  4. I’m putting it out there… I think the ‘good man’ that River kills is RORY. That’s what puts her in Stormcage. Time will tell (obviously!).

<-- Taboola Alt -->