<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Networks Ignore Sci Fi Fans?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News without the Sugar Coating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:28:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digital Media Threatens Conventional Media Advertising - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-20676</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Media Threatens Conventional Media Advertising - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-20676</guid>
		<description>[...] course, earlier I touched on the dangers that television programs face in the relevance of the soon to be antiquated Nielsen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] course, earlier I touched on the dangers that television programs face in the relevance of the soon to be antiquated Nielsen [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11601</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11601</guid>
		<description>One reason I don&#039;t have cable tv.
Commercials!

Sorry but when Cable was introduced they sold us on No Commercials. Well that changed didn&#039;t it.
I enjoy watching pretty much all my favs when they come out on dvd.
They start putting commericals inbetween the breaks on dvd&#039;s and their going to start a war...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One reason I don&#8217;t have cable tv.<br />
Commercials!</p>
<p>Sorry but when Cable was introduced they sold us on No Commercials. Well that changed didn&#8217;t it.<br />
I enjoy watching pretty much all my favs when they come out on dvd.<br />
They start putting commericals inbetween the breaks on dvd&#8217;s and their going to start a war&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11600</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11600</guid>
		<description>And... with that in mind... let us all click on an ad.

;o)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And&#8230; with that in mind&#8230; let us all click on an ad.</p>
<p>;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11599</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11599</guid>
		<description>Jeepers, Divers - I think you&#039;ve hit the nail on the head! (I&#039;m not being sarcastic, btw)

The very science of television money-making means that shows aimed at an easily manipulated audience will always win out over those that appeal to the more discerning viewer. It&#039;s simple logic, when you think about it... since, without advertising that works, there simply is no free television.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeepers, Divers &#8211; I think you&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head! (I&#8217;m not being sarcastic, btw)</p>
<p>The very science of television money-making means that shows aimed at an easily manipulated audience will always win out over those that appeal to the more discerning viewer. It&#8217;s simple logic, when you think about it&#8230; since, without advertising that works, there simply is no free television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Simmons</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11598</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11598</guid>
		<description>You have a great point Divers.

Ads are useless time filling fodder that gets in the way of the show and they never persuade me, EVER.

The scary part though, is that they do work or they wouldn&#039;t exist!!  dAh!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a great point Divers.</p>
<p>Ads are useless time filling fodder that gets in the way of the show and they never persuade me, EVER.</p>
<p>The scary part though, is that they do work or they wouldn&#8217;t exist!!  dAh!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Divers</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11597</link>
		<dc:creator>Divers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11597</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s something to it... I&#039;ve seen a lot Sci-Fi shows cancelled, while there was such a huge fanbase that this seemed like a great mistake... Perhaps it&#039;s because the advertisements have a lesser effect on tech-savvy people (they tend to greatly ignore all ads) and because of that shows that are meant for such people have lesser ad-incomes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something to it&#8230; I&#8217;ve seen a lot Sci-Fi shows cancelled, while there was such a huge fanbase that this seemed like a great mistake&#8230; Perhaps it&#8217;s because the advertisements have a lesser effect on tech-savvy people (they tend to greatly ignore all ads) and because of that shows that are meant for such people have lesser ad-incomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkbhudda</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11596</link>
		<dc:creator>darkbhudda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 02:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11596</guid>
		<description>The ratings are skewed by who they choose to sample.

I participated in one of the Australian ratings systems about 7 years ago.  300 households was the sample size, and they actually told me  my demographic, single males, was woefully under-represented.

That said, a lot of people I know like American Idol and shows like Law &amp; Order, even the sci fi fans, so it doesn&#039;t surprise me they are high in the ratings.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ratings are skewed by who they choose to sample.</p>
<p>I participated in one of the Australian ratings systems about 7 years ago.  300 households was the sample size, and they actually told me  my demographic, single males, was woefully under-represented.</p>
<p>That said, a lot of people I know like American Idol and shows like Law &#038; Order, even the sci fi fans, so it doesn&#8217;t surprise me they are high in the ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny-K</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11595</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny-K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11595</guid>
		<description>It seems to me like the ratings are far from acurate.. And when it comes to commercials people watch half the first one and mabe the 2 las ones not to miss the rest of the show- its pretty hard to know what you are getting for your money.

And now days people dont let themselfs become slaves of the timeslots anymore- you don&#039;t have to make sure you are at your home 8 every saturday for the whole year just to watch Lost(or whatever) -people use tivo , dvd recorders and downloads- not to talk of buying the whole season on dvd.

Could they make tv series just for dvd sale? to risky? why not sign up people on line- would you like more star trek enterpise? sign on - when soandso many million people sign on we start bringing you the Bakula!

-If we fan boys and sci-fi fans are so many and willing to pay for good sci-fi could we not make this happen?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me like the ratings are far from acurate.. And when it comes to commercials people watch half the first one and mabe the 2 las ones not to miss the rest of the show- its pretty hard to know what you are getting for your money.</p>
<p>And now days people dont let themselfs become slaves of the timeslots anymore- you don&#8217;t have to make sure you are at your home 8 every saturday for the whole year just to watch Lost(or whatever) -people use tivo , dvd recorders and downloads- not to talk of buying the whole season on dvd.</p>
<p>Could they make tv series just for dvd sale? to risky? why not sign up people on line- would you like more star trek enterpise? sign on &#8211; when soandso many million people sign on we start bringing you the Bakula!</p>
<p>-If we fan boys and sci-fi fans are so many and willing to pay for good sci-fi could we not make this happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meh</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11594</link>
		<dc:creator>meh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11594</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe no one has mentioned the move to digital broadcasts. With the potential for two-way communication from every digital cable box back to the source, Neilson ratings should become obsolete. The networks will be able to have statistics on what EVERYONE is watching, not just a random selection.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe no one has mentioned the move to digital broadcasts. With the potential for two-way communication from every digital cable box back to the source, Neilson ratings should become obsolete. The networks will be able to have statistics on what EVERYONE is watching, not just a random selection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11593</link>
		<dc:creator>Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11593</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an awesome lecturer once taught me: never underestimate the lowest common denominator.&quot;

On THAT we agree, lol. :-)

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an awesome lecturer once taught me: never underestimate the lowest common denominator.&#8221;</p>
<p>On THAT we agree, lol. <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sphinx</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11592</link>
		<dc:creator>Sphinx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11592</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time the Nielsen system was updated. The Nielsen families do not represent what my household watches!
I want to see good, quality shows on the air - not this crap the Nielsen people are watching.

Previously posted: &quot;And I don&#039;t buy any excuse that comes from Journeyman, I&#039;m sorry but the fans of that show have no legitimate argument in crying foul about the treatment of that show. That show was given the best treatment NBC it could give. I mean come on, it was given the post-Heroes timeslot which was one of top rated show on NBC at that time, it was also given a decent amount of time to find an audience and allowed to air all its episodes. I personally did not like the show and the critics were at best lukewarm about it. I feel that scifi fans are like Star Trek fans, they accept and enjoy crap just because they are glad that scifi and it is being made&quot;
Sorry man, I absolutely disagree with you on this. The post-Heroes timeslot was not ideal for this show as the two appealed to two totally different audiences! Whereas Heroes is an over-the-top, humans with super-powers show, Journeyman is a family drama with hints of sci-fi; the sci-fi, however, is not the main focus of the show. There was also lackluster promotion for this show on NBC&#039;s part...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time the Nielsen system was updated. The Nielsen families do not represent what my household watches!<br />
I want to see good, quality shows on the air &#8211; not this crap the Nielsen people are watching.</p>
<p>Previously posted: &#8220;And I don&#8217;t buy any excuse that comes from Journeyman, I&#8217;m sorry but the fans of that show have no legitimate argument in crying foul about the treatment of that show. That show was given the best treatment NBC it could give. I mean come on, it was given the post-Heroes timeslot which was one of top rated show on NBC at that time, it was also given a decent amount of time to find an audience and allowed to air all its episodes. I personally did not like the show and the critics were at best lukewarm about it. I feel that scifi fans are like Star Trek fans, they accept and enjoy crap just because they are glad that scifi and it is being made&#8221;<br />
Sorry man, I absolutely disagree with you on this. The post-Heroes timeslot was not ideal for this show as the two appealed to two totally different audiences! Whereas Heroes is an over-the-top, humans with super-powers show, Journeyman is a family drama with hints of sci-fi; the sci-fi, however, is not the main focus of the show. There was also lackluster promotion for this show on NBC&#8217;s part&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11591</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11591</guid>
		<description>I guess it all comes down to personal opinion and it&#039;s a good thing sites like Screen Rant exist for people to express them, eh? ;o)

Still... as much as it frustrates me to see &#039;dumb humour&#039; films like those from the Scary Movie team do well... it&#039;s a bit rich to suggest the audience is &quot;wrong&quot; for liking this stuff or that their taste is lacking. There is no &quot;right&quot; or &quot;wrong&quot; when it comes to entertainment - just differences of opinion.

As an awesome lecturer once taught me: never underestimate the lowest common denominator.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it all comes down to personal opinion and it&#8217;s a good thing sites like Screen Rant exist for people to express them, eh? ;o)</p>
<p>Still&#8230; as much as it frustrates me to see &#8216;dumb humour&#8217; films like those from the Scary Movie team do well&#8230; it&#8217;s a bit rich to suggest the audience is &#8220;wrong&#8221; for liking this stuff or that their taste is lacking. There is no &#8220;right&#8221; or &#8220;wrong&#8221; when it comes to entertainment &#8211; just differences of opinion.</p>
<p>As an awesome lecturer once taught me: never underestimate the lowest common denominator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11590</link>
		<dc:creator>Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11590</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;Nielsen families are changed every few months and the selection process is completely random.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Yes, and those same random families are responsible for keeping crap on the air like &quot;Survivor&quot; and &quot;Big Brother&quot; year after year, as I mentioned above. Look at many of the lowbrow sitcoms that flourish, heck, don&#039;t many people here consider most of what&#039;s on TV (with the exception of what&#039;s been noted in this thread) to be utter garbage?

That&#039;s what our &quot;random&quot; Neilson families help keep on the air.

The average person has lousy taste and will accept almost anything when it comes to film and TV, so I think a big part of the problem is that those who actually recognize quality are in the minority. Slice that down further by including only those in that group that enjoy sci-fi and then yeah, I can see how the numbers won&#039;t support a series.

Think I&#039;m being a jerk? Many of the replies I receive when I give a lousy movie or TV show the review it deserves rake me over the coals.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://screenrant.com/archives/meet-the-spartans-box-office-s-1327.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Need more evidence?&lt;/a&gt;

I&#039;m telling you, we&#039;re headed for the world shown in Mike Judge&#039;s film &quot;Idiocracy.&quot;

Fortunately those are the exception rather than the rule here at Screen Rant. :-)

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Nielsen families are changed every few months and the selection process is completely random.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Yes, and those same random families are responsible for keeping crap on the air like &#8220;Survivor&#8221; and &#8220;Big Brother&#8221; year after year, as I mentioned above. Look at many of the lowbrow sitcoms that flourish, heck, don&#8217;t many people here consider most of what&#8217;s on TV (with the exception of what&#8217;s been noted in this thread) to be utter garbage?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what our &#8220;random&#8221; Neilson families help keep on the air.</p>
<p>The average person has lousy taste and will accept almost anything when it comes to film and TV, so I think a big part of the problem is that those who actually recognize quality are in the minority. Slice that down further by including only those in that group that enjoy sci-fi and then yeah, I can see how the numbers won&#8217;t support a series.</p>
<p>Think I&#8217;m being a jerk? Many of the replies I receive when I give a lousy movie or TV show the review it deserves rake me over the coals.</p>
<p><a href="http://screenrant.com/archives/meet-the-spartans-box-office-s-1327.html" rel="nofollow">Need more evidence?</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m telling you, we&#8217;re headed for the world shown in Mike Judge&#8217;s film &#8220;Idiocracy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fortunately those are the exception rather than the rule here at Screen Rant. <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11589</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11589</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve gotta admit... Karl makes some extremely good points and - for the most part - I totally agree.

It does often seem to be the case that support for sci-fi TV comes from people who&#039;d accept almost anything. But, if that&#039;s the case, it&#039;s highly unlikely those same people would have the insight to see the forest for the trees.

It&#039;s human nature to think of ourselves as more worthy and important than we may actually be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotta admit&#8230; Karl makes some extremely good points and &#8211; for the most part &#8211; I totally agree.</p>
<p>It does often seem to be the case that support for sci-fi TV comes from people who&#8217;d accept almost anything. But, if that&#8217;s the case, it&#8217;s highly unlikely those same people would have the insight to see the forest for the trees.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s human nature to think of ourselves as more worthy and important than we may actually be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11588</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11588</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but this article does not make a whole lot of sense. First of all your understanding of the neilsen system is flawed; there is no one group of families that represent the ratings for whole of America. Nielsen families are changed every few months and the selection process is completely random. You say that this audience has made shows like 60 Minutes, Seinfeld, ER, Survivor, CSI &amp; American Idol #1 shows in their timeslot well, the same audience has also made shows Like LOST and Heroes ratings blockbusters. I work for one of the big 4 networks and the problem is not the the networks but the content of these shows. Today scifi is given more chance on network tv then ever before. After the sucess of LOST networks have been greenlighting Sci-fi shows left right and center. It is just that these shows themselves are not good enough.

And I don&#039;t buy any excuse that comes from Journeyman, I&#039;m sorry but the fans of that show have no legitimate argument in crying foul about the treatment of that show. That show was given the best treatment NBC it could give. I mean come on, it was given the post-Heroes timeslot which was one of top rated show on NBC at that time, it was also given a decent amount of time to find an audience and allowed to air all its episodes. I personally did not like the show and the critics were at best lukewarm about it. I feel that scifi fans are like Star Trek fans, they accept and enjoy crap just because they are glad that  scifi and it is being made

Like I said before the problem is not the networks but the shows themselves. Yes sometimes the networks do screw up the shows (like the Jericho example you mentioned, a show which started with strong ratings but then lost the momentum after a ridiculously long hiatus) but more often then not it is the shows themselves that are to blame. A lot of these shows are given ample opportunity: NBC gave Journeyman the post-Heroes timeslot and ABC gave Invasion the post-Lost timeslot which are the best timeslots any scifi show could ever hope for, but still those shows failed, that does not signify lack of support from the network but the lack of appeal of the shows themselves. I thought Bionic Woman was absolutely atrocious and even though I really wanted to like Terminator but gave up on it after the 4th episode; the story is just so bland I mean, there is no sense of mystery, there is no sense of intrigue and due to budget constraints the action is very mediocre. Honestly the only scifi shows that I really give a damn about are LOST and Heroes. Even bad episodes of Lost and Heroes are better then anything on tv. I mean the worst episode of Lost (&quot;Jack&#039;s tattoo&#039;s episode) is miles better then the best episode of Bionic Woman. JJ Abrams is developing a new show for next season which looks like it  could be the next big Sci fi hit


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but this article does not make a whole lot of sense. First of all your understanding of the neilsen system is flawed; there is no one group of families that represent the ratings for whole of America. Nielsen families are changed every few months and the selection process is completely random. You say that this audience has made shows like 60 Minutes, Seinfeld, ER, Survivor, CSI &#038; American Idol #1 shows in their timeslot well, the same audience has also made shows Like LOST and Heroes ratings blockbusters. I work for one of the big 4 networks and the problem is not the the networks but the content of these shows. Today scifi is given more chance on network tv then ever before. After the sucess of LOST networks have been greenlighting Sci-fi shows left right and center. It is just that these shows themselves are not good enough.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t buy any excuse that comes from Journeyman, I&#8217;m sorry but the fans of that show have no legitimate argument in crying foul about the treatment of that show. That show was given the best treatment NBC it could give. I mean come on, it was given the post-Heroes timeslot which was one of top rated show on NBC at that time, it was also given a decent amount of time to find an audience and allowed to air all its episodes. I personally did not like the show and the critics were at best lukewarm about it. I feel that scifi fans are like Star Trek fans, they accept and enjoy crap just because they are glad that  scifi and it is being made</p>
<p>Like I said before the problem is not the networks but the shows themselves. Yes sometimes the networks do screw up the shows (like the Jericho example you mentioned, a show which started with strong ratings but then lost the momentum after a ridiculously long hiatus) but more often then not it is the shows themselves that are to blame. A lot of these shows are given ample opportunity: NBC gave Journeyman the post-Heroes timeslot and ABC gave Invasion the post-Lost timeslot which are the best timeslots any scifi show could ever hope for, but still those shows failed, that does not signify lack of support from the network but the lack of appeal of the shows themselves. I thought Bionic Woman was absolutely atrocious and even though I really wanted to like Terminator but gave up on it after the 4th episode; the story is just so bland I mean, there is no sense of mystery, there is no sense of intrigue and due to budget constraints the action is very mediocre. Honestly the only scifi shows that I really give a damn about are LOST and Heroes. Even bad episodes of Lost and Heroes are better then anything on tv. I mean the worst episode of Lost (&#8221;Jack&#8217;s tattoo&#8217;s episode) is miles better then the best episode of Bionic Woman. JJ Abrams is developing a new show for next season which looks like it  could be the next big Sci fi hit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scratch</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11587</link>
		<dc:creator>Scratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11587</guid>
		<description>Why do networks ignore Sci Fi fans? Advertising.

Advertisers want viewers that can be swayed by a 30-second emotional appeal. Most Sci Fi fans are too &quot;logical&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do networks ignore Sci Fi fans? Advertising.</p>
<p>Advertisers want viewers that can be swayed by a 30-second emotional appeal. Most Sci Fi fans are too &#8220;logical&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmudgeTheFirst</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11586</link>
		<dc:creator>SmudgeTheFirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11586</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t say ALL of Sci-fi gets shafted, but Firefly certainly did. Whether or not you&#039;re a fan of the show you certainly can&#039;t argue that FOX never gave it a chance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say ALL of Sci-fi gets shafted, but Firefly certainly did. Whether or not you&#8217;re a fan of the show you certainly can&#8217;t argue that FOX never gave it a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11585</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11585</guid>
		<description>Jojo I agree that Connor Cronicles is real good but I wonder how it would stack up in real tv season?
^
Just a reminder gang the season finale of Terminator, the Sarah Connor Cronicles is on tonight!!!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jojo I agree that Connor Cronicles is real good but I wonder how it would stack up in real tv season?<br />
^<br />
Just a reminder gang the season finale of Terminator, the Sarah Connor Cronicles is on tonight!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11584</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11584</guid>
		<description>Scooter... as the first of those *ahem* &#039;young-uns who said maybe it was due to sci-fi fans being the type to download DVDs,&#039; I think you&#039;re missing the overall point of the post, which also included specific mention of DVDs and even VHS.

I&#039;m 28, by the way, and well aware that downloading came long after sci-fi TV started getting the shaft.

My point was that sci-fi fans in general are more into buying and keeping, hence why department stores were always chock-full of &#039;Star Trek&#039; videos, while TV would barely touch the shows. Besides, I interpreted the article more as a current issue, given how much more sci-fi/genre TV is being produced.

I mean, isn&#039;t it blatantly obvious why sci-fi got the shaft prior to this decade? The cost alone would be through the roof and not worth the investment if advertising dollars can go toward medical dramas.

As for &#039;reality&#039; TV - I&#039;ve got to admit, I love some of it. &#039;Survivor&#039; and &#039;Amazing Race&#039; are brilliant game shows, &#039;Big Brother&#039; (here in Australia) is a fun social experiment (or was before it replaced interesting individuals with dopey twenty-something bimbos and surfer dudes) and shows like &#039;Idol&#039; can be a bit of a laugh for anyone keeping their finger on the pulse of pop culture. The word &#039;reality&#039; is taken way too literally, I think, since many of the shows are just a more textured, modern take on outdated game shows, lifestyle programs and things like &#039;American Bandstand&#039;. But - yes - it&#039;s become silly and 95% of the crap needs to go.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scooter&#8230; as the first of those *ahem* &#8216;young-uns who said maybe it was due to sci-fi fans being the type to download DVDs,&#8217; I think you&#8217;re missing the overall point of the post, which also included specific mention of DVDs and even VHS.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 28, by the way, and well aware that downloading came long after sci-fi TV started getting the shaft.</p>
<p>My point was that sci-fi fans in general are more into buying and keeping, hence why department stores were always chock-full of &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; videos, while TV would barely touch the shows. Besides, I interpreted the article more as a current issue, given how much more sci-fi/genre TV is being produced.</p>
<p>I mean, isn&#8217;t it blatantly obvious why sci-fi got the shaft prior to this decade? The cost alone would be through the roof and not worth the investment if advertising dollars can go toward medical dramas.</p>
<p>As for &#8216;reality&#8217; TV &#8211; I&#8217;ve got to admit, I love some of it. &#8216;Survivor&#8217; and &#8216;Amazing Race&#8217; are brilliant game shows, &#8216;Big Brother&#8217; (here in Australia) is a fun social experiment (or was before it replaced interesting individuals with dopey twenty-something bimbos and surfer dudes) and shows like &#8216;Idol&#8217; can be a bit of a laugh for anyone keeping their finger on the pulse of pop culture. The word &#8216;reality&#8217; is taken way too literally, I think, since many of the shows are just a more textured, modern take on outdated game shows, lifestyle programs and things like &#8216;American Bandstand&#8217;. But &#8211; yes &#8211; it&#8217;s become silly and 95% of the crap needs to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-brusimm-1379/comment-page-2/#comment-11583</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/do-networks-ignore-sci-fi-fans-1379/#comment-11583</guid>
		<description>I disagree that sci-fi fans get the shaft.

Terminator sarah chronicles is doing awesome business and gets a lot of viewers.

On top of that this show delivers more in terms of action and thrills than all other sci-fi programs combined.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that sci-fi fans get the shaft.</p>
<p>Terminator sarah chronicles is doing awesome business and gets a lot of viewers.</p>
<p>On top of that this show delivers more in terms of action and thrills than all other sci-fi programs combined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
