Recent Related Items:

60 Comments


“As an awesome lecturer once taught me: never underestimate the lowest common denominator.”

On THAT we agree, lol. :-)

Vic

meh says:

I can’t believe no one has mentioned the move to digital broadcasts. With the potential for two-way communication from every digital cable box back to the source, Neilson ratings should become obsolete. The networks will be able to have statistics on what EVERYONE is watching, not just a random selection.

johnny-K says:

It seems to me like the ratings are far from acurate.. And when it comes to commercials people watch half the first one and mabe the 2 las ones not to miss the rest of the show- its pretty hard to know what you are getting for your money.

And now days people dont let themselfs become slaves of the timeslots anymore- you don’t have to make sure you are at your home 8 every saturday for the whole year just to watch Lost(or whatever) -people use tivo , dvd recorders and downloads- not to talk of buying the whole season on dvd.

Could they make tv series just for dvd sale? to risky? why not sign up people on line- would you like more star trek enterpise? sign on – when soandso many million people sign on we start bringing you the Bakula!

-If we fan boys and sci-fi fans are so many and willing to pay for good sci-fi could we not make this happen?

darkbhudda says:

The ratings are skewed by who they choose to sample.

I participated in one of the Australian ratings systems about 7 years ago. 300 households was the sample size, and they actually told me my demographic, single males, was woefully under-represented.

That said, a lot of people I know like American Idol and shows like Law & Order, even the sci fi fans, so it doesn’t surprise me they are high in the ratings.

Divers says:

There’s something to it… I’ve seen a lot Sci-Fi shows cancelled, while there was such a huge fanbase that this seemed like a great mistake… Perhaps it’s because the advertisements have a lesser effect on tech-savvy people (they tend to greatly ignore all ads) and because of that shows that are meant for such people have lesser ad-incomes.

You have a great point Divers.

Ads are useless time filling fodder that gets in the way of the show and they never persuade me, EVER.

The scary part though, is that they do work or they wouldn’t exist!! dAh!!!

Kane says:

Jeepers, Divers – I think you’ve hit the nail on the head! (I’m not being sarcastic, btw)

The very science of television money-making means that shows aimed at an easily manipulated audience will always win out over those that appeal to the more discerning viewer. It’s simple logic, when you think about it… since, without advertising that works, there simply is no free television.

Kane says:

And… with that in mind… let us all click on an ad.

;o)

790 says:

One reason I don’t have cable tv.
Commercials!

Sorry but when Cable was introduced they sold us on No Commercials. Well that changed didn’t it.
I enjoy watching pretty much all my favs when they come out on dvd.
They start putting commericals inbetween the breaks on dvd’s and their going to start a war…

Page 2 of 2«12
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.