<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Devastator Will Be In Transformers 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Arathae</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-298720</link>
		<dc:creator>Arathae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-298720</guid>
		<description>I think the new franchise is awsome.  Who cares if it&#039;s different from the cartoon series.  I for one don&#039;t give a crap I just think it is cool for them to be shown in a &quot;real life&quot; looking movie.  Not all series make good movies and likewise.  they had to cram what they could into 2 hours and still manage to make it watchable.  Its a fun movie and thats all it was meant to be.  It&#039;s not a fricken historical document people.  Change is good, you should embrace it and break free from your dogmatic ways of thinking.  waaa-waa-waa geez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the new franchise is awsome.  Who cares if it&#8217;s different from the cartoon series.  I for one don&#8217;t give a crap I just think it is cool for them to be shown in a &#8220;real life&#8221; looking movie.  Not all series make good movies and likewise.  they had to cram what they could into 2 hours and still manage to make it watchable.  Its a fun movie and thats all it was meant to be.  It&#8217;s not a fricken historical document people.  Change is good, you should embrace it and break free from your dogmatic ways of thinking.  waaa-waa-waa geez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arathae</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-298718</link>
		<dc:creator>Arathae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-298718</guid>
		<description>good so we don&#039;t have to hear from you any more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good so we don&#8217;t have to hear from you any more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arathae</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-298716</link>
		<dc:creator>Arathae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-298716</guid>
		<description>For SHAME!  He is a great actor and great comic relief I think you are just an uptight anal retentive moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For SHAME!  He is a great actor and great comic relief I think you are just an uptight anal retentive moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blooducky</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-2/#comment-110601</link>
		<dc:creator>blooducky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-110601</guid>
		<description>i didn&#039;t know devastator was in it??!! thats cool.......upgrades are awsome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#8217;t know devastator was in it??!! thats cool&#8230;&#8230;.upgrades are awsome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-2/#comment-109178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-109178</guid>
		<description>re: &quot;...Devastator IS in it! He&#039;s the tank.&quot;

Ren, Sorry to hear that you&#039;re STILL confused. Granted, there were more than a few screw-ups on Bay&#039;s part in the sequel, but this was not one of them. Devastator is NOT the tank. The tank IS Brawl, as he was supposed to be in the first movie. They didn&#039;t make that mistake again in the second movie (just all new mistakes). Just to clear it up for you: Tank = Brawl. Constucticons = Devastator. There was no confusion about that in the sequel, so go with it.

On that note, Devastator sucked! Um, no pun intended. He had such a good lead-in with the constructicons sitting there in their vehicle forms in the quarry, but then they joined, and he couldn&#039;t seem to stand up! WTH! I was expecting him to rise up hundreds of feet tall, but all he did was kinda crouch like some knee-down amputee. But then, keep in mind that Prime obliterated a Decepticon early on in the sequel that looked like Scavenger, and also beheaded Bonecrusher in the first movie. So maybe Devastator wasn&#039;t complete after all. That would explain why he couldn&#039;t stand up.

The special effects were great as usual, but the story, continuity, and character development were really disappointing. But that&#039;s Bay for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: &#8220;&#8230;Devastator IS in it! He&#8217;s the tank.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ren, Sorry to hear that you&#8217;re STILL confused. Granted, there were more than a few screw-ups on Bay&#8217;s part in the sequel, but this was not one of them. Devastator is NOT the tank. The tank IS Brawl, as he was supposed to be in the first movie. They didn&#8217;t make that mistake again in the second movie (just all new mistakes). Just to clear it up for you: Tank = Brawl. Constucticons = Devastator. There was no confusion about that in the sequel, so go with it.</p>
<p>On that note, Devastator sucked! Um, no pun intended. He had such a good lead-in with the constructicons sitting there in their vehicle forms in the quarry, but then they joined, and he couldn&#8217;t seem to stand up! WTH! I was expecting him to rise up hundreds of feet tall, but all he did was kinda crouch like some knee-down amputee. But then, keep in mind that Prime obliterated a Decepticon early on in the sequel that looked like Scavenger, and also beheaded Bonecrusher in the first movie. So maybe Devastator wasn&#8217;t complete after all. That would explain why he couldn&#8217;t stand up.</p>
<p>The special effects were great as usual, but the story, continuity, and character development were really disappointing. But that&#8217;s Bay for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-2/#comment-105751</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-105751</guid>
		<description>If you watch the first movie, you&#039;ll notice that Devastator IS in it! He&#039;s the tank. That&#039;s what confused me when I saw the second movie because the big guy sucking everything in is ALSO Devastator! I thought that was a big hole in the storyline. Either way, they&#039;re still great action flicks with all the toys!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you watch the first movie, you&#8217;ll notice that Devastator IS in it! He&#8217;s the tank. That&#8217;s what confused me when I saw the second movie because the big guy sucking everything in is ALSO Devastator! I thought that was a big hole in the storyline. Either way, they&#8217;re still great action flicks with all the toys!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YoyoyoyoNick</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-2/#comment-105747</link>
		<dc:creator>YoyoyoyoNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-105747</guid>
		<description>the devastator was only created to deyrtoy the pryamid to show the device the deaystroys the sun , that was his only job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the devastator was only created to deyrtoy the pryamid to show the device the deaystroys the sun , that was his only job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheepinatorz</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-2/#comment-103797</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheepinatorz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-103797</guid>
		<description>who cares if devastator looks the same? its a darn good movie, even tho his face looked f**ked up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who cares if devastator looks the same? its a darn good movie, even tho his face looked f**ked up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coinages</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-2/#comment-103466</link>
		<dc:creator>coinages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-103466</guid>
		<description>Well, I liked them both. But then again, I’m a chick. What do we know?

I was a huge fan of Transformers, Volton and GI Joe when I was a little girl. I’m tickled pink (no pun intended) that these shows are being brought back in a way that my tech. advanced 8 year old twins and I can share together. I tried to get them interested in the old school version but they couldn’t get past how dated everything was. Now my boys and I have an awesome way to bridge that age gap and have something to talk about. 

Not any parents have anything in common with their children anymore. I think I can overlook a few discrepancies for something that precious. 

I love all of these live action retro movies they’re making!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I liked them both. But then again, I’m a chick. What do we know?</p>
<p>I was a huge fan of Transformers, Volton and GI Joe when I was a little girl. I’m tickled pink (no pun intended) that these shows are being brought back in a way that my tech. advanced 8 year old twins and I can share together. I tried to get them interested in the old school version but they couldn’t get past how dated everything was. Now my boys and I have an awesome way to bridge that age gap and have something to talk about. </p>
<p>Not any parents have anything in common with their children anymore. I think I can overlook a few discrepancies for something that precious. </p>
<p>I love all of these live action retro movies they’re making!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jose</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-2/#comment-99934</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-99934</guid>
		<description>I A BIG FAN OF THE CARTOON DEVASTER THAT THING ON THE PAGE LOOKS TOTALLY DIFFERENT IF THERE NOT GOING TO MAKE HIM LOOK LIKE HIS SUPPOST TO THEY SHOULDN&#039;T HAVE MADE HIM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I A BIG FAN OF THE CARTOON DEVASTER THAT THING ON THE PAGE LOOKS TOTALLY DIFFERENT IF THERE NOT GOING TO MAKE HIM LOOK LIKE HIS SUPPOST TO THEY SHOULDN&#8217;T HAVE MADE HIM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unhappy</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-98950</link>
		<dc:creator>unhappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-98950</guid>
		<description>to mr bay i am not happy with what you have done with devastator or sound wave. that is not what they look like when i was a kid. shame on you for not trying to make to look like they should. sometimes thank when hollywood gets a hold of something like this they just mess it up. next time you try something like this angin make sure and do it right. brian a big transformer fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to mr bay i am not happy with what you have done with devastator or sound wave. that is not what they look like when i was a kid. shame on you for not trying to make to look like they should. sometimes thank when hollywood gets a hold of something like this they just mess it up. next time you try something like this angin make sure and do it right. brian a big transformer fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-63890</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-63890</guid>
		<description>I love the pic of Devastator (at top), and would hope it ends up that way, but probably won&#039;t, if the pic of Brawl is any indication.

His modified form (and the presumably modified forms of the other 5) will ultimately make Devastator look somewhat different.

I just hope it&#039;s not too different, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the pic of Devastator (at top), and would hope it ends up that way, but probably won&#8217;t, if the pic of Brawl is any indication.</p>
<p>His modified form (and the presumably modified forms of the other 5) will ultimately make Devastator look somewhat different.</p>
<p>I just hope it&#8217;s not too different, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-63889</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-63889</guid>
		<description>&quot;And yet, the robots were more massive than their vehicle modes would allow for. Surprise, Bay lied.&quot;

Upon watching the movie again very carefully, it appears that the size/mass/density was correct and consistent.

Flamestrike, perhaps it appears the way you say because when they are in robot form, they are &quot;stretched out&quot;, with exposed areas (joints) and &quot;air pockets&quot;(abdomen), where as when they are in vehicular form, they may be more compacted or condensed.

As far as I could see, there didn&#039;t seem to be any problems with mass simply vanishing into nothingness, or generating from nothingness.

And each Transformer stayed consistent in its transformations... even moreso than the original cartoons. So I don&#039;t have any problems with that. Bay actually pulled that off correctly...

I just wish that he had kept their heads/faces/coloration more recognizable... and also left Brawl&#039;s name alone, instead of wussying out (Besides being the correct name, &quot;Brawl&quot; is just as tough a name as &quot;Devastator&quot;).

Rest assured, time will tell if he screws up again, and diehard TF fans will be sure to complain about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And yet, the robots were more massive than their vehicle modes would allow for. Surprise, Bay lied.&#8221;</p>
<p>Upon watching the movie again very carefully, it appears that the size/mass/density was correct and consistent.</p>
<p>Flamestrike, perhaps it appears the way you say because when they are in robot form, they are &#8220;stretched out&#8221;, with exposed areas (joints) and &#8220;air pockets&#8221;(abdomen), where as when they are in vehicular form, they may be more compacted or condensed.</p>
<p>As far as I could see, there didn&#8217;t seem to be any problems with mass simply vanishing into nothingness, or generating from nothingness.</p>
<p>And each Transformer stayed consistent in its transformations&#8230; even moreso than the original cartoons. So I don&#8217;t have any problems with that. Bay actually pulled that off correctly&#8230;</p>
<p>I just wish that he had kept their heads/faces/coloration more recognizable&#8230; and also left Brawl&#8217;s name alone, instead of wussying out (Besides being the correct name, &#8220;Brawl&#8221; is just as tough a name as &#8220;Devastator&#8221;).</p>
<p>Rest assured, time will tell if he screws up again, and diehard TF fans will be sure to complain about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GUNSMITH</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-63634</link>
		<dc:creator>GUNSMITH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-63634</guid>
		<description>IVE SEEN WHAT DEVASTATOR WILL LOOK LIKE IN THE FILM, HIS BODY LOOKS GOOD BUT WHEN YOU SEE HIS FACE, WELL..IT LOOKS LIKE A BRUTAL METALIC ALIEN HOTDOG WITH GREEN LIGHT ON THE END..WHO DESIGNS THE FACES??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IVE SEEN WHAT DEVASTATOR WILL LOOK LIKE IN THE FILM, HIS BODY LOOKS GOOD BUT WHEN YOU SEE HIS FACE, WELL..IT LOOKS LIKE A BRUTAL METALIC ALIEN HOTDOG WITH GREEN LIGHT ON THE END..WHO DESIGNS THE FACES??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ERIC HARRIS</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-63468</link>
		<dc:creator>ERIC HARRIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-63468</guid>
		<description>BECAUSE TRANSFORMERS IS THE BEST MOVIE IN THE HLOE WORLD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BECAUSE TRANSFORMERS IS THE BEST MOVIE IN THE HLOE WORLD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aucklander</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-63362</link>
		<dc:creator>Aucklander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-63362</guid>
		<description>This is the real Devastator, and in my opinion this is what he should of looked like in the movie.

not that thing on the other page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the real Devastator, and in my opinion this is what he should of looked like in the movie.</p>
<p>not that thing on the other page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlameStrike</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-42128</link>
		<dc:creator>FlameStrike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-42128</guid>
		<description>&quot;And Bay did say in the beginning that he wasn’t going to mess with the size/mass/density issue.&quot;

And yet, the robots were more massive than their vehicle modes would allow for. Surprise, Bay lied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And Bay did say in the beginning that he wasn’t going to mess with the size/mass/density issue.&#8221;</p>
<p>And yet, the robots were more massive than their vehicle modes would allow for. Surprise, Bay lied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-41832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-41832</guid>
		<description>Also, I agree (&amp; disagree) with Dannyboy. It stands to reason that intelligent mechanized lifeforms who would have evolved so differently from what humans could ever imagine, &amp; have mastered the ability to mimic/camoflage themselves into any form they choose for survival&#039;s sake, would naturally be pretty generic &amp; not easily recognizable in robot form. But if they are separate individuals (not a hive-mind, like the Borg), then they still have to be able to recognize &amp; ID each other. And the only way to do that is by face or by voice. And yet, with a few exceptions, their faces were hardly recognizable. If I had seen Bumblebee&#039;s face or Jazz&#039;s face, I might have guessed their ID&#039;s correctly (maybe), but Ironhide? (no mohawk?) Ratchet? (no forehead boomerang, but large insect mandibulae?), or ANY of the Decepticons? Forget it. I was confused &amp; disgusted out of my gourd about Megatron (Mr. Squidhead, sigh) The only ID&#039;able face was Optimus, but even that was still weird. Why Bay couldn&#039;t throw us poor curs a bone by having just an ounce of familiarity &amp; logic? [rhetorical &amp; obvious. no need to respond.]

BTW, don&#039;t criticize GoBots, I loved them as much as I loved Transformers (Bionicle you can bash all you want). ;)

And yes, Wes. We can assume that Blackout (if not being some mutilated version of Soundwave himself), could have filled that role in the first movie. If you recall, during Blackout&#039;s first attack (on the military base), Scorponok or Frenzy &quot;popped-out&quot; of him. It sure reminded me of tapes popping-out of a boombox. But imagine trying to have a 40+ foot tall robot try to transform into a boombox; it&#039;d be a boombox the size of a minivan... &amp; tapes the size of VCR&#039;s (both of which are outdated forms of technology)... not realistic.

And Bay did say in the beginning that he wasn&#039;t going to mess with the size/mass/density issue. That&#039;s why a 60+ foot tall, several ton, Megatron ain&#039;t gonna transform into an 8-inch, less than a pound, P-38 pistol. 

Besides, Frenzy was small enuf to transform into a boombox (tip-of-the-hat), &amp; that was fine with me. Close enuf.

Anyway, I figure it like this: Alien machines arrive on earth, try to blend in as best they can with what was available upon arrival, &amp; so at first their forms are really strange, but as they stay on earth, &amp; become more acclimatized to not just what will help them blend in, but also to the preferences &amp; styles of our culture, then perhaps they will get more familiar looking, like Ironhide going red, &amp; Ratchet changing to white/red. At least that&#039;s my hope. We&#039;ll see how (ir)responsible Bay turns out to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I agree (&amp; disagree) with Dannyboy. It stands to reason that intelligent mechanized lifeforms who would have evolved so differently from what humans could ever imagine, &amp; have mastered the ability to mimic/camoflage themselves into any form they choose for survival&#8217;s sake, would naturally be pretty generic &amp; not easily recognizable in robot form. But if they are separate individuals (not a hive-mind, like the Borg), then they still have to be able to recognize &amp; ID each other. And the only way to do that is by face or by voice. And yet, with a few exceptions, their faces were hardly recognizable. If I had seen Bumblebee&#8217;s face or Jazz&#8217;s face, I might have guessed their ID&#8217;s correctly (maybe), but Ironhide? (no mohawk?) Ratchet? (no forehead boomerang, but large insect mandibulae?), or ANY of the Decepticons? Forget it. I was confused &amp; disgusted out of my gourd about Megatron (Mr. Squidhead, sigh) The only ID&#8217;able face was Optimus, but even that was still weird. Why Bay couldn&#8217;t throw us poor curs a bone by having just an ounce of familiarity &amp; logic? [rhetorical &amp; obvious. no need to respond.]</p>
<p>BTW, don&#8217;t criticize GoBots, I loved them as much as I loved Transformers (Bionicle you can bash all you want). <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And yes, Wes. We can assume that Blackout (if not being some mutilated version of Soundwave himself), could have filled that role in the first movie. If you recall, during Blackout&#8217;s first attack (on the military base), Scorponok or Frenzy &#8220;popped-out&#8221; of him. It sure reminded me of tapes popping-out of a boombox. But imagine trying to have a 40+ foot tall robot try to transform into a boombox; it&#8217;d be a boombox the size of a minivan&#8230; &amp; tapes the size of VCR&#8217;s (both of which are outdated forms of technology)&#8230; not realistic.</p>
<p>And Bay did say in the beginning that he wasn&#8217;t going to mess with the size/mass/density issue. That&#8217;s why a 60+ foot tall, several ton, Megatron ain&#8217;t gonna transform into an 8-inch, less than a pound, P-38 pistol. </p>
<p>Besides, Frenzy was small enuf to transform into a boombox (tip-of-the-hat), &amp; that was fine with me. Close enuf.</p>
<p>Anyway, I figure it like this: Alien machines arrive on earth, try to blend in as best they can with what was available upon arrival, &amp; so at first their forms are really strange, but as they stay on earth, &amp; become more acclimatized to not just what will help them blend in, but also to the preferences &amp; styles of our culture, then perhaps they will get more familiar looking, like Ironhide going red, &amp; Ratchet changing to white/red. At least that&#8217;s my hope. We&#8217;ll see how (ir)responsible Bay turns out to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-41827</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-41827</guid>
		<description>Ummm... everyone except Whatheff &amp; I have apparently glossed over the statement &#039;7 Constructicons&#039;...

Let&#039;s see. Who knows how to count? Hook, Longhaul, Bonecrusher, Scavenger, Mixmaster, Scrapper. That&#039;s it. There ain&#039;t no mo&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230; everyone except Whatheff &amp; I have apparently glossed over the statement &#8217;7 Constructicons&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see. Who knows how to count? Hook, Longhaul, Bonecrusher, Scavenger, Mixmaster, Scrapper. That&#8217;s it. There ain&#8217;t no mo&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Transformers 2&#8243; pix: Megatron returns, and he looks pissed &#124; MINE</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/devastator-will-be-in-transformers-2-kofi-3655/comment-page-1/#comment-33803</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Transformers 2&#8243; pix: Megatron returns, and he looks pissed &#124; MINE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3655#comment-33803</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out the pix below. If you&#8217;re hungry for more Decepticon spoilerly goodness, dig this link to learn about the appearance of another villain in the upcoming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out the pix below. If you&#8217;re hungry for more Decepticon spoilerly goodness, dig this link to learn about the appearance of another villain in the upcoming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

