Comments on: Revealed!: Devastator & The Fallen From Transformers 2

By: Eman

Eman — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:18:00 +0000

!TRANSFORMERS II is so cool…
!It`s my favorite movie today!!!

By: bababooie

bababooie — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:26:32 +0000

James shut your mouth and don’t you say another bad thing about mike bay.

By: james

james — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:17:21 +0000

mike Bay destroyed transformers. Pure and simple. Nice try but he changed everything. I was very excited when i heard a new movie was being made then i found out it was Mike Bay and his typical Armageddon style and thanks again for another cartoon to movie blunder. Atleast the original was crappy 80s tech but it stayed true to the cartoon. story and images. Mike Bay YOU SUCK

By: Decepticon Descriptions « Info About Transformers series

Decepticon Descriptions « Info About Transformers series — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:03:40 +0000

[...] The Fallen: The title character of the film, The Fallen does not have a known vehicle mode and will most likely appear only in ancient Cybertronian forms. The Fallen is one of the original Transformers and he’s described as “apocalyptic” in nature, “elemental” in power. [...]

By: robert

robert — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:14:20 +0000

sorry about the typo

By: robert

robert — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:13:57 +0000

i think devasitor should be a little more finished and the fallen fit the deceptcon symbol perfect.but there cool

By: robert

robert — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:12:55 +0000

i think devasitro should be a little more finished and the fallen fit the deceptcon symbol perfect.

By: Nick

Nick — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:45:05 +0000

Devastator looks exactly as he should. Combined of 5 different bots. The Fallen is wickedly awesome. He looks ancient and has more of an organic feel to him. Like some kind of prototype. This movie should be better than the first.

By: Keith

Keith — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:02:03 +0000

i just wanted to clarify that there was no CGI done in transformers at all Michael Bay refused to do CGI he would rather use made materials and props to make transformers if you go back to the special effects disc for the first transformers they made the transformers out of plastic pieces and alot of explosions everything was real to make it look real

By: Stu

Stu — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:27:22 +0000

Ok it makes sense now. Among a few other mistakes, Bay got the name of the tank wrong (nice going, do some more editting before the next one) His name should have been Brawl

By: Stu

Stu — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:15:26 +0000

I love the fact that they couldn’t come up with a different name for Devastator. In the first movie the tank’s name was Devastator

By: michael duke

michael duke — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:11:36 +0000

I was wondering but isnt devasator the name of the tank decepticon from transfomers 1…he gets destroyed in the city

By: Luqmanul

Luqmanul — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 04:03:23 +0000

i just cant wait for this! Michael Bay did a GREAT job on the first one, reckon the second one will be MUCH BETTER! wonder why all the autobots are not as BIG & HUGE as DECEPTICONS?

By: Transformers 2: New Info & Pic For ‘The Fallen’ - Screen Rant

Transformers 2: New Info & Pic For ‘The Fallen’ - Screen Rant — Sun, 31 May 2009 11:34:19 +0000

[...] in February, we got our first look at The Fallen character design but this new image is the first clear shot of him in action from an actual scene in the [...]

By: Eric

Eric — Sat, 02 May 2009 00:14:48 +0000

It is absurd how so many fans really think that Transformers The movie needs to be exactly like the comics and cartoons. If Megatron turned into a gun in the first movie I would of probably walked out of the movie due to how dumb that would look on screen. Michael Bay in my opinion did a great job on the first film. It was fun to watch and the humor is not as bad as alot think it is. I felt satisfied after I first saw it and the CGI was as real looking as it gets. SO many comments I read say that Michael bay sucks as a director. That is a very ignorant outlook considering how much money all his movies have grossed. SO please don’t speak when you probably will never end up even in the same category of a human being as the Multi million dollar director. I only mean that for the Haters everyone else I have a feeling you deff will.

By: toejam69

toejam69 — Fri, 01 May 2009 17:57:52 +0000

dude the fallen looks tight as he11(those are #1′s btw)
sry but can’t say the same 4 devastator,to fat and bulky, even tho he’s really gunna be a giant wheel.and i don’t rly think Bay was tryin 2 make the fallen look egyptian,seein as how he was one of the 13 original,but in a way i kinda think he was,but w/e this movies gunna be tha shite,jus like tha first one!!

By: guh

guh — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:40:19 +0000

Not bad, but why is The Fallen a Protoss?

By: marshall

marshall — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:34:41 +0000

i like them all.
fallen looks good
devistator looks good
(yes that name was used my mistake in the last movie but it was a subtitle error that was suposed to say brawl)

By: Transformers 2: The Complete Character Guide - Screen Rant

Transformers 2: The Complete Character Guide - Screen Rant — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:06:36 +0000

By: Manowar

Manowar — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:43:30 +0000

Isn’t the Fallen supposed to be bad? So why are people saying that Devastator will be fighting the Fallen?

Just wondering…