Recent Related Items:

50 Comments


marshall says:

i like them all.
fallen looks good
devistator looks good
(yes that name was used my mistake in the last movie but it was a subtitle error that was suposed to say brawl)

guh says:

Not bad, but why is The Fallen a Protoss?

toejam69 says:

dude the fallen looks tight as he11(those are #1’s btw)
sry but can’t say the same 4 devastator,to fat and bulky, even tho he’s really gunna be a giant wheel.and i don’t rly think Bay was tryin 2 make the fallen look egyptian,seein as how he was one of the 13 original,but in a way i kinda think he was,but w/e this movies gunna be tha shite,jus like tha first one!!

Eric says:

It is absurd how so many fans really think that Transformers The movie needs to be exactly like the comics and cartoons. If Megatron turned into a gun in the first movie I would of probably walked out of the movie due to how dumb that would look on screen. Michael Bay in my opinion did a great job on the first film. It was fun to watch and the humor is not as bad as alot think it is. I felt satisfied after I first saw it and the CGI was as real looking as it gets. SO many comments I read say that Michael bay sucks as a director. That is a very ignorant outlook considering how much money all his movies have grossed. SO please don’t speak when you probably will never end up even in the same category of a human being as the Multi million dollar director. I only mean that for the Haters everyone else I have a feeling you deff will.

Luqmanul says:

i just cant wait for this! Michael Bay did a GREAT job on the first one, reckon the second one will be MUCH BETTER! wonder why all the autobots are not as BIG & HUGE as DECEPTICONS?

michael duke says:

I was wondering but isnt devasator the name of the tank decepticon from transfomers 1…he gets destroyed in the city

Stu says:

I love the fact that they couldn’t come up with a different name for Devastator. In the first movie the tank’s name was Devastator

Stu says:

Ok it makes sense now. Among a few other mistakes, Bay got the name of the tank wrong (nice going, do some more editting before the next one) His name should have been Brawl

Keith says:

i just wanted to clarify that there was no CGI done in transformers at all Michael Bay refused to do CGI he would rather use made materials and props to make transformers if you go back to the special effects disc for the first transformers they made the transformers out of plastic pieces and alot of explosions everything was real to make it look real

Nick says:

Devastator looks exactly as he should. Combined of 5 different bots. The Fallen is wickedly awesome. He looks ancient and has more of an organic feel to him. Like some kind of prototype. This movie should be better than the first.

robert says:

i think devasitro should be a little more finished and the fallen fit the deceptcon symbol perfect.

robert says:

i think devasitor should be a little more finished and the fallen fit the deceptcon symbol perfect.but there cool

robert says:

sorry about the typo

james says:

mike Bay destroyed transformers. Pure and simple. Nice try but he changed everything. I was very excited when i heard a new movie was being made then i found out it was Mike Bay and his typical Armageddon style and thanks again for another cartoon to movie blunder. Atleast the original was crappy 80s tech but it stayed true to the cartoon. story and images. Mike Bay YOU SUCK

bababooie says:

James shut your mouth and don’t you say another bad thing about mike bay.

Page 2 of 2«12
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.