Comments on: More Details On Devastator From Transformers 2

By: eric

eric — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:36:45 +0000

delm devastator it is really big u know that!!!!u know that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!that is so so so reallllllllyyyyyyyyy biiiig and he is soooooooo cute iwish that he was my pet.And i hope toooo seee thisss moooviee.

By: drew herring

drew herring — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:49:22 +0000

I honestly believe the new devastator toy will be the best combine toy and transformers toy to ever be sold. The only thing i’m not to glad about is that you cant transform the vehicles to robot, and i’m wondering how many points of articulation there are because i dont want to spend 100 bucks on a TOY that only has mouth movement. The other thing is they messed up demolishers name up to something that was never in the film. Having the toy have extreme likeness to the movie version including the mouth vortex and the way the vehicles transform. Maybe they will create a version that will let you transform the vehicles to robot, though if they did it would cost 130 bucks. I am going to buy it the day it comes out.

By: priki

priki — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:48:01 +0000

i think this version of devastator looks cool and evil, cant wait to see him in action

By: Sam B

Sam B — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:09:41 +0000

im glad demolishers a constructicon, hes big enough without being part of devastator

By: keita

keita — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:40:45 +0000

decepticons pwn

By: AVforum.no - Transformers: Revenge of the fallen

AVforum.no - Transformers: Revenge of the fallen — Fri, 15 May 2009 10:59:12 +0000

[...] litt p

By: chris

chris — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:54:15 +0000

WTF? I hope this is someone’s sick joke about how Devastator looks. 1. i cant even describe what he looks like. 2. A green glowing head???? I bet the Stunticons along with Mensasor would look better in a live action film. No wonder why Mr. Bay wants a break. i dont know if its the picture or what but it looks like devastator is the size as any other transformer. Anyways, i hope Bay delivers us another good film.

By: Nuevos detalles de Devastator en Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen | SALÓN DEL MAL | Difundiendo la Ecuación Anti-Vida

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:55:49 +0000

[...] será un animal mecánico digitalizado y, de ahí, que tenga el cuestionado look que tendrá. Datos anteriores del personajes nos revelaban que la cabeza de Devastator se abrirá para crear un vortex con el que [...]

By: Matt K

Matt K — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:34:00 +0000

i think devastator looks pretty sweet my only problem is that he will probably get little screen time considering how much it would cost to detail him

By: Rob Keyes

Rob Keyes — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:59:18 +0000

@ ludovicotek, Cat

Demolishor is listed as a separate Constructicon who’s not part of Devastator.

However, there are still 7 others who are (8 Constructicons in total).

This is from the Paramount-released character list for the movie – check out my Complete TF2 Character Guide for the details:
http://screenrant.com/transformers-2-complete-character-guide-rob-6498/

By: Cat

Cat — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:34:21 +0000

The decepticon isn’t chasing prime first off. Second, he’s not a part of devastator. It’s already been confirmed. I’ll get you the link tomorrow.

By: Nick

Nick — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:15:59 +0000

LOL @ ludovicotek & cat….

The supposed ‘crane’ in the trailer chasing Optimus is not a crane at all, he is an RH400 face shovel and forms the chest of Devastator by the looks of it.
The remainder will be (minus names) cement truck – head/vortex grinder, truss crane – left arm, wheeled loader – right arm, bulldozer – left leg, dump truck – right leg.
That makes six.

This is going to be awesome……I have a few bets to make though….
I bet the screen shot released ages ago with the dude hanging onto the pole with cars flying over his head, this damage will be caused by the angry dude in the pics above, also, longshot but i’ll take it, the ‘sun harvester’ under the pyramid, you reckon devastator will be the one to destroy the pyramid to get to it?

I guess we’ll have to see…not long to go now!

I’m geekin out lol

By: cat

cat — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:00:34 +0000

yeah i think that’s demolisher. he’s not a part of Devastator. doesn’t bother me none…just another decepticon that get’s smoked!

By: ludovicotek

ludovicotek — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:41:20 +0000

“Interestingly, this packaging claims that only six vehicles form together to create Devastator which goes against the seven Constructicons number we got from the character list released by Paramount”

It has already been said that one of the Constructicons does not form into Devastator. He is the large crane, bigger than the one shown here, and can be seen in the trailer. He is the giant robot chasing after Optimus Prime.

By: Rob Keyes

Rob Keyes — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:05:35 +0000

@ Charles,

Exaggeration?

This is the first official pic explaining the head and it just broke on the transformers fan sites a few days before I wrote this…

By: charles darwin

charles darwin — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:08:12 +0000

This is really old news. These pics have been up for a couple weeks, and most of the transformer fandom already knew what the vortex was. It is supposed to suck in enemy bots and stuff, chew them up, and spit them out the back.

Also old news, is the fact that this item really ISN’T big, like we were all told it would be months ago by so-called “insiders.” They originally said it would be over two feet tall, and have individual bots that could not only transform into their own separate robot mode, but could change into a third mode, for the Devastator merge. In an overseas toyfair pic set, this item is only about 14 inches tall, and is thick, and the individual bots sold in this set only change into their separate Devastator modes. No robot mode. Yeah, that sucks. I do think though that this character will look like a certifiable nightmare on screen, and that is cool.

By: cat

cat — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:03:20 +0000

that vortex thing sounds pretty wicked. I guess he’ll be tearing it up in the movie!

By: Longshanks

Longshanks — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:33:17 +0000

@ Walwus

I agree partially.

It was fun to put all of the Constructacons together to form one,but once you got them together they weren’t very poseable and was very flimsy.

One would like to believe that they made the toy like that on purpose to kind of reflect the cartoon,because Devestator was rather easy for the Autobots to dismantle(I believe it was a blow to the midsection that would topple it),but i really don’t think that was the case.

Either way,I’m wondering how they are going to explain(or even bother trying to)why his name is Devesator since they screwed up by calling the tank that name.I think the toy looks a bit lame,but I’ll bet it will look fantastic on the big screen.

By: K

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:05:51 +0000

Devastator will be awesome in this movie.
Autobots beware. June 24th, 2009 Be Ready.

By: Walwus

Walwus — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:51:27 +0000

As a child of the eighties, part of the fun of the original Devastator was putting him together from by manually combing the individual Constructicons. This toy appears to be one solid unit that is partial bendable instead. Anyone else notice friggin big that toy is? Dude’s hand behind it makes it look like a ventriloquist’s doll.
Either way, I’m hoping to really enjoy the action in this film.