David S. Goyer’s ‘Invisible Man’ Remake Is Still Alive

Published 4 years ago by

invisible man remake David S. Goyers Invisible Man Remake Is Still Alive

The mixed box office results from previous Universal monster movie remakes like The Mummy and The Wolfman has done nothing to deter the studio from announcing plans to re-do other classic horror titles – like Bride of Frankenstein and The Invisible Man.

David S. Goyer has been attached to script the Invisible Man remake since 2007, but there’s been little-to-no word about the project for almost three years now. However, it looks like things might be moving forward in the future.

Goyer has been extremely busy of late, working to some degree on the storylines for upcoming comic book movies like Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance and The Dark Knight Rises – not to mention, scripting Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel. However, he offered assurances to Hero Complex that his reworking of author H.G. Wells’ famous novel-turned-movie about a scientist who manages to make himself… well, invisible, and eventually descends into insanity as a result, is alive and well.

Here is what Goyer had to say, with regards to his Invisible Man:

“It’s something slowly working its way through the Universal development channels. It’s still alive… We did some pre-vis tests and things like that that they were very happy with. Now we’re going through the casting process. If they get the right lead, they’ll make it.”

So what approach is Goyer taking to the story? The answer probably won’t surprise you:

“It’s a period film but it’s period like Downey’s ’Sherlock Holmes’. It’s period but it’s a reinvention of the character in the sort of way that Stephen Sommers exploded ‘The Mummy’ into a much bigger kind of mythology. That’s kind of what we’ve done with ‘The Invisible Man.’”

invisible man mummy remake David S. Goyers Invisible Man Remake Is Still Alive

Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes has become the template for most upcoming re-interpretations of classic literature-turned-films – be they (very) relatively straightforward (The Three Musketeers) or more flat-out twisted spins on a famous novel (Pride and Prejudice and Zombies). However, Stephen Sommers’ The Mummy is arguably the predecessor to even Holmes, seeing how it mixed old-fashoned period adventure thrills with big-budget blockbuster action and CGI spectacles, all the way back in 1999.

Whether or not that approach makes sense with The Invisible Man is a matter up for debate. The bigger issue not working in favor of his take on Invisible Man is the fact that Goyer has ALREADY directed (but not written) a movie with a non-seeable protagonist – the lackluster 2007 release, The Invisible.

Goyer’s work tends to be very hit-or-miss, but he arguably does best when he’s collaborating on a non-original project that features someone else in the director’s chair. Since that appears to be the plan with The Invisible Man (that is, assuming Goyer isn’t planning on directing the film), this project could join the list of his good creations.

We’ll keep you posted on the status of The Invisible Man as more information is released.

Source: LA Times

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. No sex & no humor scenes, or it’s your audience you’ll see disappear!

    • Unfortunely I agree with you.

  2. Wells’ story is a character-driven suspense tale that capitalizes on how man reacts to the unknown, or in this case the unseen. No need to ‘reinvent’ it too much if they stay true to the source material and cast a talented ensemble around its antagonistic lead, Griffin. There’s a reason the story is a classic.

  3. Ironic Screenrant runs an article about remakes and then every other story is about some studio doing, a remake !

    This idea was fine in it’s original form and the fact they seem to be looking for possibly another Mummy film is not a good sign. That formula worked for two out of three of those movies and the same treatment was not so great when used in Van Helsing.

    And the idea of re-imagining this story is also played out since it was done in Hallow Man already years ago.

  4. I hear talk that they may resurrect the “Invisible Man”. BUT, are young people today too savvy to buy into that concept? If you remove a person’s eyes they will be blind. An irrefutable fact. Light is no longer focussed by the lens and then applied to the retina where it is converted into electrical inpulses and then sent to the brain by the optic nerve. Where the brain then interprets that light as an image. Since an invisible man will have none of this because everything needed for vision will be transparent, he will, in effect, be totally blind. How’s that for a plot hole?