Comments on: Dakota Fanning To Star In New Moon?

By: ANGEL

ANGEL — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:06:53 +0000

I THINK THEY SHOULD FIND A BETTER ACTRES BECAUSE I DONT CARE DAKOTA AND SHE NOT THAT GOOD OF AN ACKTRES

By: AlexisW

AlexisW — Sat, 09 May 2009 10:35:47 +0000

I love dakota she’s gonna be the next A-list stars out there. omg just anyone please do not take vanessa hudgens, geez of all the people! Besides, Vanessa is too girly, obviously, can’t act either, seems pretty pathetic if you ask me, and who can imagine her playing the part of a VAMPIRE? Luckily, the rumor is not true..alleluia…

By: myzhelle

myzhelle — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:45:54 +0000

She would be great for the role!!
she has been able to pull off any role that has been given to her. and i know that she can be the angelic b*chy little Jane… so hey might as well just give her the dang role!!

By: Lynette

Lynette — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:17:54 +0000

I personally think that Dakota Fanning is a great choice. She’s a terrific actress and i really don’t think anyone should worry about whether or not her appearance would suit the character because it should not be forgotten the amount of actors who have successfully portrayed their characters who are far younger than their actual age. For instance Tobey Maguire in Spiderman, Ashley Tisdale in HSM and Suite Life, Raven Simone in that’s so raven, Cate Blanchett and Brad Pitt in Curious case of BB, and not to state the obvious Rob Pattinson. In the gist of things, make-up,costume and camera work wonders together and so there is really no reason to worry about whether or not she can pull off the look. Take Cam Gigandet
(James) in the book James hair was cropped short but in the film they made it long and it suited the whole persona of the character really well, so maybe they may adapt a look for Dakota that would also suit who Jane is. All there really is to be concerned about is the acting, and what we’ve seen so far from Dakota there really isn’t anything to worry about. It will be interesting to see. However it must be said Alexis Bledel was better suited for Bella thats just my opinion, oh and Elizabeth Reaser (Esme) should have kept her hair dark brown like she was in Grey’s Anatomy (Rebecca/Ava).

By: K.A

K.A — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:29:57 +0000

I think that Twilight is…
AWESOME!!!!!!
And I think New Moon (the Movie( is going to be even BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think Dakota will do fine is this movie!!! : )

By: Anon

Anon — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:00:42 +0000

I think Fanning is a terrible choice.

Coming in, Robert Pattinson had his name on the big screen with Harry Potter. But half of the people who loved him as Cedric Diggory, didn’t even know his name. There was no other “big” names in Twilight, and in my mind that made it a more unique, wonderful movie.

You add Fanning, and now people are just going to watch because of her. She’s going to “out-star” some of the new discoveries that Summit has been making, and that’s a huge disappointment. Others should have a chance to make their breaks, without having to compete with someone who’s already considered a big name.

On the note of the actual casting, I don’t think she makes an adequate Jane. Jane was always envisioned, in my mind and that of my Twilight obsessed friends, as a very young but powerful vampire. Fanning is far too old, or is groomed to look far too old, for that role.

These are my personal opinions, yes, but I know they’re shared by others. I don’t disagree that Fanning is a wonderfully talented actress. I just disagree with her casting in New Moon.

By: Mundane and Incomplete

Mundane and Incomplete — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:34:19 +0000

Rob was in Goblet of Fire, not Sorcerer’s Stone.

And what of Ben Barnes possibly playing Aro? Im perfectly fine with these choices, so long as we do not mix High School Musical fame in here. Because the fandom won’t be horrid enough…

@Jess, i was being VERY sarcastic. there is such a thing as hair dye, i use it monthly, dakota would be a very good jane, and wouldn’t let something so trivial as hair color get in the way.

By: Brittney

Brittney — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:22:56 +0000

Yeah. I think that some undiscovered person would do best. Btw…who did rob play in sorcerors stone? And Kristen is a good miserable person. In the Messegers, her parents didnt believe her and she was all like depressed. Maybe someone out there can give her lessons on being miserable…i know i can…

By: Rae

Rae — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:02:35 +0000

I agree with Joe H, about wanting some new people not just people that you’ve seen how many times in movies. Except Rob, I think he was pretty great in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s stone. I’m looking forward to seeing who these characters will be and how well they will be in New Moon, but I am not really looking forward to the movie because out of all the books, I think New Moon is the worst because it’s so sad! I am looking forward to how Kristen will be, playing a miserable person.

By: Joe H

Joe H — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:50:47 +0000

First off i just want to say that them bringing in any big name is a crime. I dont want to imagine someone ive seen in 2 or 3 movies playing anyone in this series, I had enough time accepting edward because of the horrid harry potter movie. for the fans of twilight, a true fan not the ones that are the bandwagon fans that started reading only once they were popular, its a slap in the face to cast people like dakota we want new people that we can engrain as the cullens or the wolfs of la push. I hope this doesn’t happen and that in the end they find some upstart young pretty actress that can do somethign becides scream. p.s. tom welling would have been the perfect emmit, the only exception to my rant about known acters

By: Jess H.

Jess H. — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:22:39 +0000

@ Mundane and Incomplete

I think it has been said a total of 5 times

Everyone will get over this I bet as soon as the movie comes out. I wont be suprised.

By: More Join ‘New Moon’ Cast? - Screen Rant

More Join ‘New Moon’ Cast? - Screen Rant — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:06:13 +0000

[...] Fanning takes the role she was offered without an audition, she would have the power to inflict immense pain on those who cross her–a role quite [...]

By: Mundane and Incomplete

Mundane and Incomplete — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:52:37 +0000

@vic

thank you. because it hasn’t been said enough times.

By: Vic Holtreman

Vic Holtreman — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:43:30 +0000

Um, actors dye their hair for roles all the time.

Vic

By: g

Thu, 05 Feb 2009 07:55:18 +0000

im a better jane no offense dakota!!!!!!!

By: g

Thu, 05 Feb 2009 07:53:08 +0000

i love dakota but she just dosent fit jane. jane has brown hair not blond!

By: Mundane and Incomplete

Mundane and Incomplete — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:56:56 +0000

Of course, the twihards wont like it. let me remind you, everyone hated rob, kristen, nikki, EVERYONE that was cast in the beginning. now they wouldn’t have it any other way.

By: Rachel

Rachel — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:46:40 +0000

I DO NOT like the idea of Dakota Fanning as Jane…definitely not at all how I pictured her, and like many have already pointed out, I don’t think she could pull this role off.

By: Dakota Fanning offered a Role in New Moon | The Movie Reviewer

Dakota Fanning offered a Role in New Moon | The Movie Reviewer — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:15:46 +0000

[...] ScreenRant offers: According to E!, the 14 year old is in talks to play Jane, a character described “as a petite blonde with a “Botticelli angel-like face…[and] crimson irises,” in a casting notice that was released earlier this month. [...]

By: Brittney

Brittney — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:04:20 +0000

Jane is a “light brown” haired i think 13 year old. Most 13 year olds dont look like their a teen untill maybe 15. And mabey her hair color is like a dirty blonde. Dirty blond can be light brown looking. I have hair like hers, and pale skin…i wonder…im jk but i have a point.