‘Dads’ Series Premiere Review – Funny or Die?

Published 2 years ago by

dads premiere fox green Dads Series Premiere Review   Funny or Die?

If someone said trying to get cheap laughs was easy, then they never saw creators Alec Sulkin and Wellesley Wild’s (Family Guy) new sitcom, Dads. The writers are trying to hit a home run without ever stepping up to bat – and with an acting duo that possesses talents like Giovanni Ribisi and Seth Green, the show should be a hit. However, the pair can’t achieve success unless they’re given good material to begin with.

Eli (Green) and Warner (Ribisi) are two highly successful video game developers who also happen to be lifelong friends. From the very beginning of the episode it appears that racial stereotyping is going to be one of the main components of this series, as we’re introduced to Veronica (Eli and Warner’s Assistant). While the men are trying to conduct a business transaction with a Chinese corporation, they decide it would be beneficial to have Veronica dress in a skimpy school-girl outfit in order to impress their Eastern clients.

Racial stereotypes can be found in many present-day sitcoms, and they’re mostly funny due to the exaggerated elements of truth found within each joke. As writers on the hit series Family Guy, Sulkin and Wild could have handled these comedic themes with more tact. Jokes about race are not inherently bad; however, in Dads none of these attempts at humor feel organic. The jokes have an almost, “This needs to be edgy, for the sake of being edgy” feel. Still, with as many faults as this show has, it’s not without its charm.

dads premiere fox Dads Series Premiere Review   Funny or Die?

Scantily-clad Veronica aside, the bit where Eli and Warner are pitching their new video game, “Kill Hitler 2,” was a moment of pure hilarity. This scene also has the episodes’s best line when the pair are informing the businessmen that there are “45 new ways to kill Hitler” in the upcoming sequel. For a moment, during that section of the premiere, Dads displayed its true potential. Hopefully, more of that potential will be showcased in future episodes.

By the end of the premiere, both Warner and Eli’s fathers are living with their sons and causing nothing but trouble. Unlike their offspring, Crawford (Martin Mull) and David (Peter Riegert) are broke and homeless. Like Archie Bunker from All in the Family, the two men possess no verbal filter for anything they say. At one point, David refers to Warner’s wife (Camilla) as the maid. Later in the episode, Crawford walks into his son’s office and wants to know where their “gay guy” is. If this were 1971, when All in the Family premiered, then this brand of humor might have been revolutionary, but in 2013, it comes off as cheap and inauthentic.

The criticisms of this show come from a place of high expectations for a sitcom with a great actor like Ribisi. That same actor, who gave an outstanding performance in 2000′s Boiler Room, appears to be dialing down his acting abilities in order to make the show work. Both he and Green deserve a great series, but Dads may not be the proper vehicle to speed their comedic careers along.


Dads continues next Tuesday with ‘Heckuva job, Brownie’ @8pm on Fox.

Follow David Griffin on Twitter @griffinde
TAGS: Dads
Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Haven’t seen it myself but it sounds like two guys who got a series based on a conversation that probably went:

    “These guys write for Family Guy? Send them the cash, they got a show! They have who now? Seth Green? The kids LOVE that guy! Send cameras, immediately!”

    • Liked, laughed, will watch again.

  2. it had a few good jokes in it. it will be one of those shows i may watch if nothing else is on, but tuesdays at 8 against shield is gonna be tough. and going straight into drug humor in the next episode. hmmm.

  3. I saw the title of the show, the stars in it, and instantly cringed.


  4. seth green needs to stay behind the camera

  5. it was painful. Kids will like it.

  6. This is one of those shows that the younger generations will like but as for myself I thought it was just boring. The humor was all over the place and wasn’t even all that funny

  7. Seeing the trailer for the show was enough for me. I like the two main actors a lot, but this show just looked bad. I’ll stick with Brooklyn Nine Nine for now as my new comedy. That show definitely has some potential.

  8. A generic sitcom, complete with trite office settings and your standard laugh track, I could not believe how bad it really was.

  9. It just wasn’t funny. I’ll be honest, all the drama surrounding the show is what got me to tune in (besides Green and Ribisi), but I can’t think of anything that I laughed at. Also, all it’s quick cuts between scenes seemed really awkward. I think we’ve found our first cancellation of the new season.

  10. Hated it. Which is really a shame with such a talented cast. Reminded me a teeny bit of 2.5 men. Upon seeing the previews for week 2 – succumbing to marijuana humor – I asked my husband, “is it possible to jumpt the shark before it even gets off the ground?” I won’t be giving it a second look.

  11. Wow… totally amazed me at how bad that was. The best acting in the show was the dog. Still blown away that that even got a premier.

    • Oh… and you’re going to end your first episode with the main cast looking at a picture of some Chinese guy’s wang… Come on… nothing original, totally immature and horrible acting.