Recent Related Items:

4 Comments


Gary says:

The Irony here is I caught this during commerials because I was Watching Fringe and figured I could catch this on reruns!

IQ says:

Another CSI season starter disappointment. It was a good episode, don’t get me wrong, but it felt with how they had hyped up the episode with the great promos the actual scene was very short and nothing really came from it. With what I’ve heard about all three CSI’s being connected I thought for sure with the similarities in stories with NY and Las Vegas (doesn’t watch Miami) this was how they were going to do it. All CSI divisions being attacked simultaneously by one group I’m afraid wasn’t meant to be. What I thought was going to be the start of a new great arc wasn’t. On an another note Fishborn’s character continues to be great ( bad@$$ kick there man, very Morpheus against Agent Smith look-alikes) developing and growing as he finds his place within the team. I like how their showing the distress within the team as well. Things didn’t just go back to normal after Gruesom left, as it shouldn’t. Bringing back Sara is a major bummer as I had hoped we were done with her flat character. Overall I still think that the more minor characters ( the techs )need more light as the veterans of the show seems to be waning. I’m keeping my fingers crossed for another great story arc like the miniature-doll house killer, one that fully explores Fishbourn’s character and gets some growth within the others.

prtfvr says:

Loved The Matrix heavy opening. Liked that Lawrence Fishburn could still do the high kick after all these years. The Agent Smith look a likes were fun. The “bullet time” shots were nice. It was really a great opening. It didn’t same like they were trading on Fishburn having been in The Matrix but more of an homage that I enjoyed. It wasn’t subtle. Just right in your face. Nice touch.

The episode was fine but I had two problems. 1) After so much build up the crime was easily solved at the end. Disappointed. And 2) Marg Helgenberger’s face lift was a distraction in every scene she was in. I didn’t even know she’d had one until I saw this episode and all I could do was stare at her face and obsess over how surprised she looked the entire show. If that isn’t a facelift they’ve got a hell of a gaffer on staff!

Sara was too little too late but I liked seeing her again. Greg being a little bitch was actually kind of fun. I hate Catherine’s management style and it’s obvious that her “my way or the highway” attitude isn’t going to work. Nick got promoted to her old position was nice. God knows he’s put in the time.

They seem to have easily gotten over Warrick Brown’s death. Not even a mention of him, that I noticed.

I really like Fishburn in this role. He’s brought some life into the show and a change of pace. Hopefully he’ll have more than this season to make an impression but 10 years is a long time to be on the air especially after losing a major cast member. Hopefully the writers will be able to hold the fans attention. I know I’ll tune in at the very least to see what Lawrence Fishburn is up to.

Jason says:

A great intro for a rather dull case. I left Las Vegas shortly after Grissom, but wanted to catch this episode to see how well the show has evolved since the major departures of Warrick and Grissom. The dismissal of Riley’s character was weak and I didn’t understand how Sara went from being “unable” to do the job last season to being happy-go-lucky this episode. The idea of the lab being attacked/blown-up has become stale and it’s sad that they’re recycling guest star villains. I always enjoy watching Garret Dillahunt, but he was already a CSI bad guy several seasons ago (”Precious Metal”). But, he pulled it off well here, just as he did on Deadwood. One other slight note, it seemed strange that Langston was promoted to CSI-2 in the same episode where Nick is made supervisory assistant, yet in the field Langston seemed to be leading Nick. For a show that really set the tone for years, this episode seemed to lack the same heart it once had.

What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.