Comcast Buying NBC Makes Me Nervous – Should I Be?

Published 5 years ago by , Updated February 10th, 2012 at 9:06 am,

Nabbing up NBC is also going to give Comcast the rights to some premiere sporting events like the 2012 Olympics.

Comcast Comcast Buying NBC Makes Me Nervous   Should I Be?

Comcast comes to the table with their own portfolio which includes:

  • 25 million television subscribers in 39 of the 50 U.S. States
  • 15 million Internet service customers
  • 6.4 million telephone service accounts. (It’s the 3rd largest phone provider in the U.S..)

Additionally, Comcast owns or partially owns the following networks:

  • CN8,
  • Comcast SportsNet,
  • SportsNet New York,
  • MLB Network Comcast Sports Southeast/Charter Sports Southeast,
  • E! Entertainment,
  • Style Network,
  • G4,
  • Versus,
  • The Golf Channel,
  • AZN Television, and
  • FEARnet. <- One of my personal favorites!

Comcast Is A Focused Business

Comcast is focused on making money. With all of these entities being pulled under the same roof, will we still have variability of choices or do you think they might do what many large corporations do when they absorb other companies? That would be trimming the fat and “reorganizing” the infrastructure.

This had me wondering if we will be seeing some changes at Hulu, as the question about Hulu charging for content had come up in the past.  But Comcast addressed the issue pretty quickly by saying that Hulu will be business as usual. In fact, they said that some new content will appear on the popular internet streaming site and other shows will appear on the Hulu competitor called TV Everywhere. TV Everywhere is something that Comcast, Time Warner and a few other cable companies rolled out last summer.

When all is said and done, I do see Comcast doing some double dipping. Entertainment and sporting programming needs sponsors and advertisers to pay for production. All the while, Comcast can charge their 25 million customers the usual fees for that same programming. Sweet for them.

Will The Customer Reap Any Benefits From NBComcast-Uni?

It’s no mystery that producing entertainment is an expensive endeavor. I have to wonder why GE was selling NBC. Was NBC-Uni falling short financially somewhere? Was the sale necessary for a needed influx of funds to keep going? I’ve seen that a number of times in motorsports when a team sells a stake of their team for just that reason. Sell or go under. If that’s the case, don’t be surprised that when Comcast moves in, some trimming or reorganizing really does take place.

We can’t say for sure without knowing the details of NBC Universal’s true financial plight.

What possible advantages could the consumer see with this joint venture? Movies that come from Universal Studios could become available more readily through video on demand (VOD) services.

Optimally, being a wishful thinker, this could mean that we have movies on VOD at the same time some of these projects come to DVD or even when a project opens in theaters. That should sooth some of our pirate-like readers over on our conversation about Movie Piracy!

Of course with access to recent movies and Comcast providing internet access, I can only guess that we could see content become available on the Internet just like cable’s On Demand. It could be called Net Demand, or On Demand Net! (There, I just coined some phrases before they did. Now they have to pay me if they use my idea!)

I’m personally worried for one of my favored networks, the Syfy Channel. I believe they’re doing alright but I’d hate to see this situation change their scenario in some way. True, it’s not an optimal network but it is my go-to channel in off-hours. But that’s just one tiny aspect in this entire deal.

For now, despite the deal being put together, there is still just one tiny hurdle to defeat for Comcast, and that’s the FCC approval for this entire deal.

There are many critics to this deal and many wonder if the FCC will actually let this deal finalize. That, is something we will find out in time.  I’m on the bubble as to whether this deal should go through.  It could do the consumer good,  or we could lose big time to the momentum of making money in the business of entertainment.

I’d love to hear what Screen Rant readers feel about this deal.

References:  TV Guide Magazine, Business Week (1) (2),, NBC-Uni, Wikipedia (1) (2), CNET, TV Everywhere, Wired

« 1 2

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Naw nothing to worry about,,,
    A single day after the two media giants announced their deal, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts proudly weighed in to strongly support the Senate Democrats’ health care reform bill.
    Now Comcast is a big company, with about 100,000 employees.  I’m sure health care costs have a big impact on their bottom line.  But the bottom line impact on Roberts’ personal net worth will be much greater if the federal government, with a big say-so from the US Senate, approves the $13 billion deal. So Roberts’ heartfelt letter to the president in support of the Democrats’ singular policy issue was the first action he took in what is expected to be a twelve-month regulatory review process. 
    This is an action with absolutely no relevance to the vast intricacies of the merger, but a move that sets a new standard for blatant pandering aimed at a group of people for whom pandering is the new standard operating procedure. ^
    Nothing to see here, move along, move along,,, ;-)

  2. Um, Yeah, you SHOULD be worried as COMCAST as a Business has been notorious for their underwhelming customer support shows their attitude toward those who use their services. I wouldn’t be surprised if this merger goes through to see that certain cable channels suddenly become a “package” requiring an extra fee on other non-comcast systems. From their disengenuous commercials to hock their wares, their limiting speeds in particular areas and all the rest, this merger should be opposed by anyone who enjoys NBC entertainment.

  3. the old man The was the best slippery slope argument I’ve ever seen… Ridiculous, but stillt he best one I’ve ever seen.

    I love how so many people make a bigger deal out of it than it really is. The best comment about this deal so far is from T simply because he was talking about their customer service.

  4. I am a comcast employee. I have also been a comcast customer for years. First off this merger is only going to bring good things to come for consumers. We are an ever expanding company in an attempt to bring the most quality service to our customers. As I am sure most of you know the telecommunications industry is a very competive industry. Our competitors have moved full head of steam towards the wireless route. I believe my company has decided to go a different route with there growth. Comcast gets a bad rep for being such a big company, but to be such a big company we must be doing something right. We already provide content same day as dvd and theatrical release(usually Indie films. We will have an online accessable Video On Demand by the end of the first quarter of 2010. Now through multiple different mediums we will be able to provide you with all your NBC/Universal favorites quickly and reliably with our cable and internet services.

  5. I don’t support big congoms that pander to obama and support socialist heathcare. ^
    Keep sending those letters comcast I’ll keep throwing them away for ya,,, ;-)

  6. @Tim

    Yes, much better that it happen under an administration that is trying its damndest to take over private enterprise while simultaneously bankrupting the country for generations to come.


  7. Maybe they can get that arse Olberman off the air.