Comments on: New Zombie Film ‘Colin’ is the Talk of Cannes

By: Steven

Steven — Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:13:02 +0000

Looks really interesting, I look forward to seeing it. You can not tell it was done on such a low budget. It is a similar story to The Nearly Deads zombie music video that was done with friends of the band on an extremely low budget. http://youtu.be/yVXoC-95zDk

By: spiro

spiro — Sun, 08 Apr 2012 04:18:08 +0000

Someone told me that the $70 budget was more hype than anything else. Actually, the first time I heard of this movie, the budget was reportedly set at $80. Anyway, what this person told me was that Marc Price gave people roles in exchange for contributions and the movie actually cost way more than just $70. I remember the word being that he had $80, a crowbar and coffee. Nothing else. But now I read that the movie took 18 months to make. $70 my ass! I’m in the business and there is no way he spent only $70! Think about it. 18 months and only $70 was spent? Come on fanboys! I know you guys don’t have the strongest grip on reality but this doesn’t make sense. No f’n way! Does someone have a link to an article that breaks down the budget for this movie? $70 over 18 months is insane. Sorry but I don’t buy it.

By: spiro

spiro — Sun, 08 Apr 2012 04:03:18 +0000

Well, we all have the right to voice our opinion wether you like it or not. After all, criticism is a part of the business. I mean, isn’t that what critics do anyways? Mr. Price will be ok no matter how good or bad his movie is.

By: Scandal Celebrity Gossip

Scandal Celebrity Gossip — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 08:15:18 +0000

[...] wеnt οn tο praise Colin, a micro-budget zombie movie hе caught whіlе filming Hugo іn [...]

By: peejay

peejay — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:12:01 +0000

Excellent acting? Look at it again! If I was being eaten alive by zombies I’d be fighting like a wildcat, and screaming like a banshee!

All the ‘victims’on this thing just lay there as if they were enjoying it!

And ‘Colin’ just looked as if he had a hangover.

British horror films are nearly always amateurish junk – and I’m British.

By: peejay

peejay — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:02:21 +0000

Didn’t you think it was rather unconvincing? If I was being eaten alive I would be screaming like hell, and fighting like a wildcat! The ‘victims’ just seemed to lay there as if they were enjoying it!
And the ‘acting’ was pitiful!

By: peejay

peejay — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:47:13 +0000

Colin — hmmm. The idea was fairly good, i.e. following the story of a zombie (Colin) from first being bitten to his destruction by a vigilante mob, but it failed miserably because of the details. In other words: lack of story, poor camerawork, poor lighting, poor acting, poor sound, unconvincing special effects.
And, oh yes, a goofy-looking main character who could not act to save his life.
Indie film-makers should realise that using amateurs does not make a film more realistic – it just makes it look, well, amateurish. One of the many problems was that there was hardly any dialogue between the humans –people all shouting at the same time cannot replace a script (it’s a tried and tested method which has stood the test of time pretty well).

I think the worst fault, however, was the ridiculously unconvincing scenes of people being attacked and eaten alive by zombies. A man slumped by a wall while a zombie chews at his stomach — does he scream? No. Does he struggle? No. Does he look in pain? No!! Colin removes his ear (it comes off as if attached with selotape) and he doesn’t seem to even mind!
Another scene is so bad it’s laughable. A room full of people being attacked by zombies — one man standing on the stairs seems to be playing a game — he’s got some saucepans, and now and then he seems to be tapping zombies on the head playfully – like some sort of game. Again no-one seems to be very bothered by the process of being disembowelled. I would have thought the screaming would have been deafening – but not a sound.
All in all a boring waste of time.

By: Infamous Ruse

Infamous Ruse — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:06:14 +0000

Did something right. A lot of people are talking and noticing, which is how you initially attract an audience. Look forward to your tweets @infamousruse

By: Infamous Ruse

Infamous Ruse — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:06:14 +0000

Did something right. A lot of people are talking and noticing, which is how you initially attract an audience. Look forward to your tweets @infamousruse

By: Marc Draco

Marc Draco — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:08:35 +0000

Well, FWIW, I’m involved in a community project with a larger (unknown) budget right now with a new take on the Dracula legend – but definitely not Twilight [shudders].

It has a twist not unlike the ones in Usual Suspects/Sixth Sense because not everything you will experience is precisely what it seems but only senior production staff know what that is. Even the actors and crew won’t be briefed until we film the “reveal” scenes. Although we’re only working on HD video, we’ve gone back to basics of telling a story with moving images.

This is what all filmmakers should remember and a lesson I learned as an eager movie-maker aged 12 when my super-8 magnum opus was returned from a competition with a note remarking the special effects were excellent (for the day) but there was no story.

As for the $70 budget – that really is laughable but brilliant marketing; rather like the guy on Youtube with ultra-low-budget 4’21″ sci-fi extravaganza: everything costs money; particularly software.

The suite I’m using to cut our movie cost me (personally) nearly $5000 not to mention the 8-core mac to run it.

The production company is on a Facebook group (Solar Workshop) so anyone interested in working with is can find us there.

By: The Argentine Post » Blog Archive » Horror Film Festival To Spook BA This Week!

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:51:33 +0000

[...] the British Indie director Marc Price. The film cost only $70 to produce. Colin turned out to be a surprise smash hit at Cannes. You can see the trailer for Colin [...]

By: Azze.

Azze. — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:42:35 +0000

Your personal opinions don’t make a difference to the general public. If you don’t like it, leave it and ignore it rather than kicking up a fuss like a two year old and making yourself look silly.

By: Dreamworks To Adapt ‘Xombie’? - Screen Rant

Dreamworks To Adapt ‘Xombie’? - Screen Rant — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:54:43 +0000

[...] George A. Romero’s latest, Survival of the Dead; the super low-budget Cannes hot topic, Colin; and THR tells of another Dreamworks project called Rainbow’s Bridge, a remake of a Japanese [...]

By: superD

superD — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:04:38 +0000

$70 they say and a year and a half working on it? Add in the pizzas and refreshments the director bought for his friends over that time and the gas money to get to locations and the cost of the monthly internet usage which was used to gather the free actors and crew and on and on…
It’s a clever gimmick and we wouldn’t be talking about this low end first film otherwise. Take a look at the 2nd trailer
for the film on the Colin website. It looks like a home movie made by a bunch of kids who borrowed their parents’ camcorder. I wouldn’t pay to see it.

By: Stuart

Stuart — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:13:54 +0000

As I understand it it was partially filmed in London and Wales – just the transport getting between locations would cost more than 45 quid – definitaly “hidden” costs!

By: Anteprima FF09: Colin « I 400 calci

Anteprima FF09: Colin « I 400 calci — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:31:40 +0000

[...] in prestito/rubata da altri film a cui la troupe stava lavorando nel frattempo. Quali altri film? Wolverine, ad esempio. Giuro. Mavaffanculo. È come se una si vantasse di campare senza lavorare, e poi saltasse fuori [...]

By: ‘The Descent 2′ Heads ‘2009 Film 4 Frightfest’ Line-up - Screen Rant

Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:31:44 +0000

[...] Dominic Monaghan); the £45/$70 zombie film that got a lot of attention at Cannes this year called Colin; and the Danish Nazi zombie flick, Dead [...]

By: Marc Machado

Marc Machado — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:39:47 +0000

And, sorry again, the whole $70 thing is a bit of marketing, isn’t it? People had to eat, get to the locations, some equipment rented (or used and depreciated, for g*d’s sake), electricity bills, etc. Even if everyone involved paid for all of their personal expenses, it’s still production money. “Leftover makeup” just doesn’t cover it. But it’s a good meme, everybody is talking about the 70 bucks movie.

By: Marc Machado

Marc Machado — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:28:37 +0000

70 bucks? Looks like it’s worth it, sorry…

By: Anon

Anon — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:41:22 +0000

Yeah, this looks utterly ridiculous. I’ve seen some terrible zombie flicks in my day, independent and professional, and this one looks no different. I’m not seeing anything new being brought to the table. I would’ve loved to have seen at least DECENT zombie makeup, but I saw nothing but a few drops of blood around the mouth and eyeshadow. Better luck next time.