Early ‘Cloud Atlas’ Reviews Hint at a Divisive But Unique Drama

Published 3 years ago by , Updated September 10th, 2012 at 2:35 am,

Cloud Atlas Early Reviews Early Cloud Atlas Reviews Hint at a Divisive But Unique Drama

When an unofficial trailer for the Wachowski siblings and Tom Tykwer’s Cloud Atlas appeared online it was a breath of fresh air amidst a tireless parade of sequels, remakes, and reboots. The trio’s adaptation of David Mitchell’s novel has been something we at Screen Rant have been following for a while, but it wasn’t until recently that the realization this film was actually happening set in.

Now, Cloud Atlas has made its big screen debut at the Toronto International Film Festival, and several reactions and reviews have begun flooding the Internet. The film’s official trailer painted a more concise picture of a sweeping narrative told across several different time periods, but it still didn’t properly communicate how dense Mitchell’s novel is and, more importantly, how grand an undertaking adapting it would be.

Which leaves us wondering whether the stunning visuals and brief story bits seen in the footage came come together in a cohesive manner, and furthermore if the film is a rousing success or a colossal failure, or somewhere in between. More importantly, though, we’re curious to know if the A-list talent behind the project (like Tom Hanks and Halle Berry) can elevate it to a serious awards season contender.

Based on what is being said about the film we can confirm Cloud Atlas will be talked about for several years to come, but unfortunately it might not live up to audience’s lofty expectations. There’s a wide range in terms of reviewers’ reactions to the film — none of them overly negative, but all of them steadfast in their proclamations that Cloud Atlas is something unique. To get a better sense of what critics are saying about Cloud Atlas, here are a few choice quotes from four strikingly different reactions.

NOTE: Click the name of any website to their full review:



On a technical level, we suppose the film is an accomplishment, with costumes and period details mostly coming through, but in most other ways, this $100 million effort offers fortune cookie social commentary put in a blender with a handful of thinly interlocking stories, in a failed attempt to say something meaningful about the human condition, and how modes of good and evil perpetuate themselves across centuries. Too long by at least a half hour, and both dull and repetitive as it goes on, Cloud Atlas reaches for envelope-pushing storytelling but never delivers on its promise.



Yes indeed, Cloud Atlas is a huge movie, the sort of film you could build a college course around. Is it completely cohesive? I’d have to argue it’s not, but my respect for the effort far outweighs my concern over clarity issues. I wouldn’t recommend anyone walk in there that didn’t want to ponder the very meaning of life, but, given that stipulation, it’s the exact sort of film we need directors attempting. If art informs culture, and surely it does, then you want your artists asking the big questions. That’s all Cloud Atlas does, and though the film takes pains to point out that change agents rarely reap the benefits of their
revolutions, they are no less noble for their transcendent nature.



Cloud Atlas is a film that dares to imagine something beyond what is typically done in big-budget filmmaking, dense and daring, and as with Speed Racer, I’m sure some people will be thrown by the basic cinema vocabulary on display.  Nothing is spoon-fed to you, and I walked out of my screening almost drunk on the potential of movie storytelling and the idea that there are plenty of frontiers left for us to explore.  It is easy to be worn down by Hollywood’s constant stream of remakes and sequels and comic books, but all it takes is one Cloud Atlas for me to once again believe that anything is possible if the right artists are given room to experiment.



Yet while the directorial trio does their best to ensure that things flow together smoothly enough and that their underlying message—basically, no matter what the epoch, we are all of the same soul and must fight for freedom—is heard extremely loud and incredibly clear, there are so many characters and plots tossed about that no one storyline feels altogether satisfying. As history repeats itself and the same master vs. slave scenario keeps reappearing, everything gets homogenized into a blandish whole, the impact of each story softened by the constant need to connect the dots.


tom hanks halle berry cloud atlas trailer Early Cloud Atlas Reviews Hint at a Divisive But Unique Drama

As indicated, there’s no overwhelming consensus on Cloud Atlas, with everything from the star-studded cast to the score being either criticized or praised. For example, three of the reviews applaud the directors for their cinematography and visuals, while another found them to be “dully imaginative.”

It’s hard to pin down exactly what didn’t work for each reviewer, as each found flaws in different areas — making it even harder to recommend the film to audiences. In fact, a lot of the film’s elements – namely its six or seven storylines and interchanging characters – will make it nearly impossible to market.

Nevertheless it appears fans of cinema are going to want to keep their eyes out for Cloud Atlas when it releases in October, but should also be forewarned that it isn’t getting across-the-board glowing recommendations they might have anticipated. In fact, only one of the reviews featured proclaimed it as one of this year’s best films. All of them, though, agree that it will surely be among the year’s most talked about.

Cloud Atlas releases in theaters on October 26, 2012.


Sources: See Post For Links

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Well, it’s one of those movies I know I’ll like. Sounds like a big F*** You to the whole “spoon-feeding of the viewers every little unclear detail” business. Super 8, who many people like, has a specific scene where the father tells the kids every little detail of what’s going on, but it’s so obvious it’s for the viewers. It ruined the film for me because it made me feel like they assumed I was stupid and unable to follow their,relatively clear, logic. I like my mysterious movies to stay mysterious, so that I can reflect upon them a long time after the curtains are closed at the theater. I’m sure quite a lot of people agree with me on that, hence why Twin Peaks is considered a classic. You never really knew exactly what was going on in Twin Peaks, and it was intriguing. I’m not saying all Sci-fi films should be like The Fountain, because that’s an extreme, but a little mystery adds to the drama and overall entertainment.

    For those of you who were around back when Matrix was released, it was considered strange at first too. It’s not a solid clasic. Some movies need to be seen twice. Just like some music need a second listen.

    • * It’s now considered a solid classic. Typo.

    • “for those who were around back when Matrix was released” …lol! It wasn’t that long ago!

      …At least, chronologically speaking. Because if you consider all the rubbish that’s come along since The Matrix, it’s been a veritable eternity. =/

  2. I saw the film at TIFF and was in awe. The six stories intertwine at a frantic pace, each compelling and engaging, making for a dense but never confusing film. It deserves an Oscar purely for casting. Having the same actors play different characters in different stories makes each of them, paradoxically, easier to follow. Amazing design, special effects and sublime music add to the enjoyment. Watching the film is a satisfying, rich experience.
    BTW, I have not read the book. I’ve heard it was considered “unfilmable”. I don’t know how well the film reflects the book. Had I read it, I might be more critical, but I think the film is brilliant.

  3. I am going to read the book this month, just about finished reading ‘Life of Pi’ – which now having read 95% of I can honestly say the movie looks like a grand and glorious translation to film! I really wish someone who HAD read Cloud Atlas had given us some kind of hint at the comparable qualities. (not that movies are ever better than books, but it would be nice to hear at least an informed opinion on the subject!)

  4. Waterworld 2012?

  5. I’ve read it, but I haven’t seen the movie, so I’m not much help I suppose.

    I will say this—to those complaining that nothing is quite conclusive, that’s how the book is too, so this aspect will not bug me.

  6. Mitchell’s novel is and, more importantly, how grand an undertaking adapting it would be.

  7. Just saw Cloud last night. This most interesting and different movie has inspired me to go get the book. There was so much to say and comprehend in this film that there is no way it could possible cover everything from a book and not be 4-5 hours long, but it is near 3hrs. However it is well shot and acted, beautiful on the eyes and thought provoking, not like anything from Hollywood at all or anyplace else that I know of for that matter. It stands out in a crowd and will likely be studied in film classes.
    It will be interesting to see what imitations and inspirations in filmmaking come from this film being made.