<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buzz Can&#8217;t Save A Bad Movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/buzz-cant-save-a-bad-movie-vic-510/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/buzz-cant-save-a-bad-movie-vic-510/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:59:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/buzz-cant-save-a-bad-movie-vic-510/comment-page-1/#comment-2806</link>
		<dc:creator>Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/buzz-cant-save-a-bad-movie-510/#comment-2806</guid>
		<description>True, it looks like Cloverfield is taking a really big drop this weekend, but it DID divide audiences pretty sharply.

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, it looks like Cloverfield is taking a really big drop this weekend, but it DID divide audiences pretty sharply.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/buzz-cant-save-a-bad-movie-vic-510/comment-page-1/#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/buzz-cant-save-a-bad-movie-510/#comment-2805</guid>
		<description>I know this is 18 months later, almost, but it should be pointed out that Borat benefitted from the Internet in the beginning, and Cloverfield and Blair Witch owe a lot to JJ Abrams&#039; web campaign that got the blogs talking.

However, on Friday 1-25-08 (weekend 2), Cloverfield was in a tight race for number 3 and was sitting at 4.

heath
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is 18 months later, almost, but it should be pointed out that Borat benefitted from the Internet in the beginning, and Cloverfield and Blair Witch owe a lot to JJ Abrams&#8217; web campaign that got the blogs talking.</p>
<p>However, on Friday 1-25-08 (weekend 2), Cloverfield was in a tight race for number 3 and was sitting at 4.</p>
<p>heath</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/buzz-cant-save-a-bad-movie-vic-510/comment-page-1/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 05:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/buzz-cant-save-a-bad-movie-510/#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s a good example of how too much hype can be just as bad as too little hype.  I have seen Snakes on a Plane, and it delivers exactly what it advertises -- a cheesy horror/action movie that features snakes on a plane.  If you go in knowing what to expect, you can have fun with it.  I have to say, though, that for mindless entertainment, it&#039;s hard to beat Transporter 2.  :D

Brian
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s a good example of how too much hype can be just as bad as too little hype.  I have seen Snakes on a Plane, and it delivers exactly what it advertises &#8212; a cheesy horror/action movie that features snakes on a plane.  If you go in knowing what to expect, you can have fun with it.  I have to say, though, that for mindless entertainment, it&#8217;s hard to beat Transporter 2.  <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

