‘Broken City’ Review

Published 1 year ago by , Updated November 18th, 2014 at 3:47 am,

Broken City Review Starring Mark Wahlberg Russell Crowe and Catherine Zeta Jones Broken City Review

Broken City is only worthwhile for die-hard fans of the actors involved, or those who don’t need a clear narrative to enjoy a gritty odyssey through the underbelly of NYC.

Broken City plunges us headlong into the zoo of modern New York City, where we find disgraced ex-cop Billy Taggart (Mark Wahlberg) working as a paparazzi-style private eye, taking beatings and earning ire, while being stiffed on payment by deadbeat customers. Billy gets a chance to return to the big leagues when his old acquaintance, Mayor Hostetler (Russell Crowe), calls him in for a favor: follow Cathleen Hostetler (Catherine Zeta-Jones), the mayor’s wife, to find out who she is having an affair with.

Billy thinks the gig is easy money, but when his investigation is implicated as part of a high-profile murder, Taggart gets wise to a chess game of power involving politics, corruption and urban plight, in which he is just a pawn.

With Broken City, director Allen Hughes (Book of Eli) and newcomer screenwriter Brian Tucker had pretty lofty ambitions – but unfortunately, those ambitions are thwarted by a film that falls flat on its face in terms of both directorial and narrative execution. It’s a shame, because there is more thought and intelligence woven into this crime drama tale – only that wisdom is somehow lost in translation to the screen.

Mark Wahlberg and Russell Crowe in Broken City Broken City Review

While marketed as a standard hard-boiled crime thriller, the movie is in fact an attempt at more subtle and layered commentary on many areas of city life. The title of the film is the biggest clue into what Hughes and Tucker are going for: “Broken City” is a general reference to the hypocrisies and injustices of “the system” that governs every level of urban America – as well as serving as a reference to the “broken” people who exist within that system. It could’ve been a scathing and effective commentary on very real issues (much like Se7en used crime-thriller conventions in its sly commentary on the squalid state of urban America in the ’90s); but instead, what we get is a somewhat scatter-brained narrative, populated with characters who are so compromised or unsympathetic (in one way or another) that it’s hard to root for or relate to any of them.

Both Wahlberg and Crowe turn in good performances (Crowe especially hams it up with his pseudo-New Yorker accent and braggadocio) – but again, those performances are only bringing to life misconceived characters in a flawed narrative, so it’s hard to applaud them all that much. Billy should be our protagonist, but with his on-and-off again alcoholism, indiscriminate brutality, questionable morals (and implied homophobia), it’s hard to know how to take the character, all things considered. Somewhat less murky is Crowe’s status as the villain in the piece – but given the surrounding characters, even a clear-cut bad guy seems less bad (comparatively speaking) by the time the end credits roll.

Russell Crowe and Catherine Zeta Jones in Broken City Broken City Review

Russell Crowe and Catherine Zeta-Jones in ‘Broken City’

The supporting players are no better: Jeffrey Wright (Casino Royale) plays a NYPD commissioner whose morals and loyalties are always in flux; Zeta-Jones plays the put-upon political wife whose “suffering” is padded by her own compliance with the socialite world she inhabits; Barry Pepper (True Grit) plays mayoral election challenger Jack Valliant, whose surname belies the many moral compromises he’s made in the name of a “greater” political good; Alona Tal (Supernatural) plays Katy, Billy’s young secretary at the P.I. firm who is supposedly the film’s ‘moral center’ (though her quasi-flirtatious relationship with Billy is often more confusing than wholesome); Griffin Dunne (House of Lies) plays an ego-maniacal business mogul who cares more about money than people, while James Ransone (The Wire) plays his son, who would do good in the world if he wasn’t so spineless.

Natalie Martinez (End of Watch) drives a baffling subplot as Billy’s actress girlfriend, Natalie, whose big break in an independent film carries its own message about the nature of the film industry, and the moral compromises that are made in the name of art. It’s a pretty incongruous addition to a crime drama story, to say the least, and is but one example of how Tucker and Hughes spread their focus far too thin. Only Kyle Chandler’s (Zero Dark Thirty) character, Paul Andrews, seems to stand for anything in any kind of morally relatable way, and Chandler manages to bring some much-needed level-headed analysis in a key monologue delivered early on in the film.

Allen Hughes is better known for the projects he’s put out alongside his brother, Albert Hughes - Menace II SocietyDead PresidentsAmerican PimpFrom HellBook of Eli – and in many ways, Broken City is an experiment to see what happens when you break the pair up. Bottom line: the experiment is not successful. While Hughes is a competent director, there are moments in Broken City when the visual composition falls apart completely (a scene on a nighttime balcony between Wahlberg and Zeta-Jones looks like it was shot on someone’s Camcorder) – and in general, the finer points of direction (like the tone of a scene) miss their intended marks.

Mark Wahlberg in Broken City 2013 Broken City Review

Mark Wahlberg in ‘Broken City’

Tucker’s script is no help, as the writer seems more concerned with indulging in every little commentative thought he had about the state of urban existence, rather than telling a more focused story whose themes may have been more effective than this muddled tale we are forced to sift through for meaning. After further examination, it seems the story attempted to convey Billy’s journey from a place of personal denial to acknowledgement of  his own “broken” morality – and then, tried to marry that  character arc to the larger mystery involving Mayor Hostetler. However, the film just never gets there – in any way, shape or form.

Even conventional story beats are mishandled: the film plays like it’s building to some sort of grand twist or reveal (which you’ll see coming WAY in advanced); but when we ultimately at arrive at that “climax,” most competent viewers will recognize that A) the “twist” is one the story outright reveals from the very beginning, and B) it’s a “twist” that was directly acknowledged in the very first trailers for Broken City (see below) – as though it was part of the story’s premise all along. Needless to say, the payoff of the film is a resoundingly hollow thud.

Broken City is only worthwhile for die-hard fans of the actors involved, or those who don’t need a clear narrative to enjoy a gritty odyssey through the underbelly of NYC. Add to that list those who hold morbid curiosity to see Allen Hughes out own his own, and you have the narrow niche of appeal this movie holds. Definitely not worth a theater ticket – not even necessarily worth a future rental. Considering the talent involved, it’s a shame that it is ultimately the film itself which is (wait for it)… broken.

[poll id="504"]

———

Broken City is now playing in theaters. It is 109 minutes long and is Rated R for pervasive language, some sexual content and violence.

 

Our Rating:

1.5 out of 5
(Poor, A Few Good Parts)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: broken city

24 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. not even worth a rental? ouch. I didn’t plan on watching it in the cinema, but this sounds even worse than expected..

  2. told you so.

  3. shame because the premise sounds great and I actually liked the trailer

  4. The review paints a clear picture of the film, which is a shame. I’d hoped for something along the lines of the Pacino/Cusack film, City Hall.

  5. Another big build up to a Wahlberg movie, and another big disappointment. Why does this guy keep getting leading man roles????

    • I dont think that its fair to generalize Wahlbergs movies as always being disappointments. Especially when his last 5 movies have been big critical successes while doing well in the box office simultaneously. I mean SR just barely posted an article about Ted 2, are you not seeing any of this? You just cant get the Happening out of your head can you! haha

  6. Stark, sometimes actors sign contracts with studios for multiple movies, and don’t alwasy get to pick which ones to skip.. So sometimes you get a good movie from a an actor and then a few crappy films until he fulfills his contract. Mark is a pretty good actor..but sometimes he has to take the bad with the good to keep working..

    • Ted, Contraband, The Fighter, The Other Guys, and Date Night… All great movies to my understanding (havnt seen Ted yet but it scored big with critics and in the box office) I think Wahlbergs been putting out some quality movies as of late. I’m not defending Broken City, it looked like a dud to me since I first saw the trailer. I’m defending Wahlberg.

      • Actors weren’t the problem here – script and directing were.

        • thank you Kofi. if you cast wahlberg in a decent movie, he’ll deliver. like moviedude mentioned movies like ted, the other guys and the fighter are great imo, not to mention his older stuff like fear, boogie nights and the departed.

      • Didnt like ted or contraband. As for the fighter he may have been the lead but it was the actors around him aka christian
        Bale, amy adams and the mother. But mark did a fine job, just doesnt always pick the best films.

        • yeah other than the obvious draw of money I dont know why some actors/actresses take on some of the roles that they do. Some movies smell like stinkers from a mile away. I mean take broken city for example, its just some generic crime drama but somehow Wahlberg, Russell Crowe, and Cathrine Zeta Jones are in it. Its baffling to me.

        • @Trey

          FYI, Melissa Leo was the actress that played the mother in The Fighter and I agree, she was phenomenal…

      • i thought “the other guys” was about the dumbest thing ever.

        • @jeffro

          I agree, I didn’t think it was as good as some people say it was… It had its moments, but overall it was pretty dumb.

  7. Marky Mark rocks! Bring on Transformers 4!

    Maybe, maybe not.. Maybe go F***K yourself!

  8. Whoa!

    Thank you Kofi.

    Saved me money and some very valuable time.

  9. I never even heard of this movie until five seconds ago.

  10. I have to say I’m not surprised by the review, the tone of the trailer reminded me of something I may have rented in the 90′s after I had seen everything else in the video store, reminded me of The Last Seduction or A Perfect Murder

    Crowe is awesome in everything and Walhberg is decent when, like has been said, given the right script and direction

    As long as 50 Cent and Vinnie Jones aren’t in it, then you know it can’t be that bad

    which having said that, doesn’t give me much confidence in The Tomb which features them both!

  11. I got off work early on Friday and went to see this in the afternoon. It is boring and I fell asleep. The acting is meh and the storyline has been done to death. Don’t waste your time and money on this snoozer.

  12. @Kofi

    As an aspiring screenwriter i’m inclined to ask you, why do all of the movies from the Blacklist’s top ten usually like…suck when they’re produced? Isn’t the whole point of the list to single out talented writers who were combed over and help their script get noticed? The produced movies i’ve seen based on scripts from this list (This and last year’s Safe House) are very….like…not really all that good at all. So i just can’t help but wonder, in order to get recognition from the Blacklist or any kind of recognition does one have to just write a mediocre or in this case incoherent script and then you’ll get noticied? I read reviews partially to see what critics look for in movies are far as flaws in order to be aware of the stuff when i attempt to write so i mean why don’t these guys do that too? Especially when the problems are so blatant.

    Also why is David Guggenheim smiling in his IMDB photo?? Safe House and Stolen??? A FORGETTABLE THRILLER THAT ONLY HAD STAR POWER ON IT’S SIDE AND A NICOLAS CAGE (ALMOST) DIRECT TO DVD THRILLER?? WHAT ARE YOU SMILING ABOUT, DAVE???

  13. That’s kinda like asking a song writer why he doesnt make every song a hit radio song. Fact is its one in a million that could even write one. And a miracle to do it again if they write one. And any writer/artist eventually wants to grow and branch out into other areas, and its not always successful. Then screenwriters have to be filtered through directors, producers, actors, editors, and if everything doesn’t come together just right, then that’s just more variables to get in the way of success

    • I guess, but i’m not saying they have all have to be masterpieces in order to be on the list but that i’d assume they would just have to be like..NOT so obviously fundamentally flawed?? But you’re right as soon as money and other people start to become involved things do get kind of muddy. I guess i’m thinking more along the lines of just from eyes to paper the problems should be easily identifiable

  14. “Come on, Come on / Feel the vibration / unh”