Comments on: ‘Bride of Frankenstein’ Remake Reawakened

By: jasen

jasen — Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:08:53 +0000

The remakes are there because people still love the nastalgic movies and tv!If that were not true we would not have classic tv stations on satelite and cable and Netflix.So that is astablished!Also…the world is full of people of all ages..the modern is not for everyone..Not everyone cares about Reality Tv..if these so called great youngsters were so great..we would not have so much junk ..Reality tv…Create a star shows like You can be a star..the fact is the quality is gone and has been for decades!So why not bring back remakes..As long as they do it with quality it will be great..frankly almost everything in movie history has been remade at some point!If these new movie kids can do it better..then lets see them do a movie with quality without sex…drugs..hangovers..or the [F]word..Come on..it’s about quality ..i could write like todays young writers just by standing around listening to kids after school..they know two things…Like…and [F]….they do just a few things..So i for one of the millions who love classics welcome the challenge of a remake!Wolfman was great!

By: Alex

Alex — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:18:56 +0000

Modern day? Seriously hope they don’t do that; it would be awful. I don’t think they should remake it all, to be honest, unless they’re going to do it very carefully and not just cast random people for the sake of it.

By: What are the Best Aurora Horror Model Kits?

What are the Best Aurora Horror Model Kits? — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:28:48 +0000

[...] @CHARSET "UTF-8"; .productRowEven { background-color:#DDD; } .productRowOdd { background-color:#FFF; } .arow { border-bottom: solid 2px #aaa; } .imagecell { width: 110px; } .imagecell a img { width:100px; border: 0; }#split {}#single {}#splitalign {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}#singlealign {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}.linkboxtext {line-height: 1.4em;}.linkboxcontainer {padding: 7px 7px 7px 7px;background-color:#eeeeee;border-color:#000000;border-width:0px; border-style:solid;}.linkboxdisplay {padding: 7px 7px 7px 7px;}.linkboxdisplay td {text-align: center;}.linkboxdisplay a:link {text-decoration: none;}.linkboxdisplay a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} function opensingledropdown() { document.getElementById('singletablelinks').style.display = ''; document.getElementById('singlemouse').style.display = 'none'; } function closesingledropdown() { document.getElementById('singletablelinks').style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('singlemouse').style.display = ''; } Week 209: Attack of the Mozzarella MonstersTeaser: John Dies At The EndGreat Movies: Bride of Frankenstein (1935)‘Bride of Frankenstein’ Remake Reawakened [...]

By: JG

JG — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:25:11 +0000

I like that the classic universial monsters are coming back but BOF is so classic and there isnt another Karloff. Why not make a sequal to one of the universial monster movies. Staying in the same vain of course. GET Depp to be in some.

By: jock123

jock123 — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:37:04 +0000

If the question of originality was really at stake, the original “Frankenstein” movie wouldn’t have been made (“What? Make a film out of an old book – no!? There are kids out there with original ideas…”).
Actually, I’m more confused by the view expressed here, and in other places, that a re-make has to be a period piece – “like the original”. What period was it set in, exactly? None of the Universal creature features pass muster as “period pieces” because so many elements were contemporary to their production – men in 20thC lounge suits, women with short skirts and Hollywood hairstyles. At best they are set in a sort of never time, and at worst they are plainly modern day (the “Mittel European” countrysides might be faux old, but you get there from modern day America…).
So set remakes in the early twentieth century, or in the present day – it won’t matter – just do it well…

By: John "Kahless" Taylor

John "Kahless" Taylor — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:14:11 +0000

I can understand why they are remaking these classics, they are dated. But like Christopher R. Mohr Sr. said, there are young writers with original ideas out there that are being overlooked.

How about remaking Hollywood into an organization with original ideas? “I’d buy that for a dollar”.

By: Christopher R. Mohr Sr.

Christopher R. Mohr Sr. — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:57:41 +0000

When I see what I think is a perfect film being remade, I can only think that whoever is doing it possesses no creative talent and hopes to tag along on the original film’s coat tails.

When I think of all the great, young creative talent out there who cannot make a film because they cannot get the financing, it is doubly painful to see someone who has the financing spending it on their copycat endeavours.

By: 790

790 — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:24:37 +0000

Re-issue the classic film, spend a few million dollars on the bonus features. Give us a 4 disc directors cut special edtion, Skynet version…
But do not remake this film you bastards…

By: Vic Holtreman

Vic Holtreman — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:28:00 +0000

LOL @Michael Claymore.

Vic

By: Michael Claymore

Michael Claymore — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:26:33 +0000

Hollywood must die.