‘Breaking Dawn’ Plagiarism Suit Dismissed

Published 5 years ago by

breaking dawn cover4 Breaking Dawn Plagiarism Suit Dismissed

Back in August we reported on a story that was broken by TMZ and MTV News regarding a plagiarism suit filed against Twilight Saga creator/author Stephenie Meyer over her fourth and final book in the saga, Breaking Dawn.

The suit, filed by a 21-year-old musician/author named Jordan Scott, demanded that Meyer’s publisher, Hachette Book Group, cease and desist all printings of the Breaking Dawn novel, as contents of the book were allegedly copied from a novel Scott wrote when she was 15-16, entitled, Nocturne.

A lot of you looked at that case summary and immediately cried B.S. Now it’s looking like you made the right call.

The “striking similarities” between Breaking Dawn and Nocturne included:

  • A post-wedding sex scene
  • A scene about a woman who’s sick because she’s carrying a child with “evil powers”
  • A scene with the death of the main character’s wife

There was even some side-by-side analysis done of the two texts to see if there might not be truth to the charge. That “evidence” was far from incriminating at the time, and, according to MTV, United States District Court Judge Otis D. Wright II pretty much felt the same way when he dismissed the suit this past Wednesday. According to Hachette, Wright found that the “characters in the two works are vastly different.” The judge also claimed that Scott “twice manipulated aspects of the subject works in order to create the appearance of similarity.”

A young, wannabe artist making a frivolous lawsuit to gain fame and/or money? Unheard of in America!

Hachette attempt to nail the coffin shut on this suit by firing off the following statement:

This judgment confirms what we have known all along — ‘Breaking Dawn’ is a wholly original work by Stephenie Meyer and this was a frivolous lawsuit brought for the purposes of publicizing the plaintiff’s personal publishing aspirations…Hachette Book Group and Stephenie Meyer are pleased to be able to put this case behind us.”

But don’t count Jordan Scott out yet! Said the young “artist’s” lawyer:

“…We are pleased the judge very carefully made a side-by-side comparison of ‘The Nocturne’ and ‘Breaking Dawn’ and issued a considered opinion regarding his decision. At this point, Jordan Scott is studying her options regarding continued prosecution of her case against Stephenie Meyer.”

This dismissal represents the second (widely publicized) plagiarism suit that Meyer has had to face down in 2009 – an earlier suit was ultimately revealed to be a complete hoax.

stephinie meyer1 Breaking Dawn Plagiarism Suit DismissedMeyer

I said back in August: True or not, the clear loser here is still the literary community. Breaking Dawn isn’t exactly Shakespeare (I remember when the book was about to be released and fans thought a first chapter preview Meyer released was a hoax because it was so poorly written!). The real humor in all this (for me at least) is that Meyer’s work can conceivably be held up to that of a teenager’s! I’ll stop poking fun there; I know a lot of you in fact enjoy these books. I ain’t mad ‘atcha.

In the end, this is the price of fame, sadly. However, with New Moon breaking movie records right now, I’m pretty sure Stephenie Meyer is laughing all the way to the bank – lawsuits or no lawsuits.

Side Note: I don’t feel like I should have to say this, but, NO BITING JORDAN SCOTT you Twilight fans out there… We know how you guys do… icon wink Breaking Dawn Plagiarism Suit Dismissed

The film version of Breaking Dawn (Parts 1 & 2?) are currently slated for release sometime in 2011.

Source: MTV News

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: breaking dawn, twilight

7 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. That means that Superman, Batman, Spiderman, Green Lantern and Thor should all sue each other.

    I am 100% sure that Breaking Dawn and this pathetic excuse of a “book” have absolutely nothing in common at all.

  2. So wait a minute, someone becomes extremely successful as a writer and suddenly someone out there is suing for plagiarism?

    I wonder if J.K Rowling can sue Stephanie Meyer for plagiarising her life?

  3. I am surprised that Stephanie Meyer hasn’t been sued by lots of people for plagiarism. Not because I think she did, but just because there are lots of similarities between Twilight and other vampire stories that came out before hers, particularly the Sookie Stackhouse books (source material for True Blood).

    Well, everything is derivative from something else, anyway…

  4. There’s a pretty fuzzy line between plagiarism and derivative works. Meyers can’t be said to be wholly original in her works (although I’ll give her sparkly Vampires… not a good idea, but an original one none-the-less), but I doubt she’s outright plagiarised people (though I won’t be too upset if I were proved wrong on that).

    Her books may share themes and ideas with the Sookie Stackhouse books, but the idea of a woman falling in love with a beast of some sort isn’t an amazingly original idea. The difference of course is that one author did something pretty decent with the idea and the other… wrote Twilight.

  5. I read a lot of Buffy fanfiction on the net at one time:

    I think Stephanie stole ideas from those original theives…except she didn’t write as well!

  6. Who would bother with an awful book like “Breaking Dawn?”

  7. well im surprised i really like the twilight saga