Brad Pitt (Finally) Speaks About Moneyball

Published 6 years ago by , Updated August 14th, 2013 at 4:27 pm,

moneyball book1 Brad Pitt (Finally) Speaks About Moneyball

Let’s run the bases real quick and recap the whole Moneyball fiasco(cue the movie-montage):

Oscar winner Steve Zaillian spun a script from Michael Lewis’s book about Oakland A’s general manager Billy Beane’s successful attempt to put together a baseball club on a budget. Sony picked it up, Brad Pitt and Steven Soderbergh hopped on board, Soderbergh retooled the script into something more along the lines of a documentary with “if it didn’t happen in real life, it won’t happen on the big screen” running through its veins. Sony bucked, the head of Sony, Amy Pascal pulled the plug the morning of the first day of shooting.  There.  Now we’re all on the same page (for more details, go here).

Today we have new details on Moneyball‘s current status and a few words from its (almost) star, Brad Pitt.

So Soderbergh turned in this new script that was (allegedly) some kind of bastardization of Sony’s original vision for Moneyball.  At the outset, the movie was reported to capture the essence of Billy Beane and his frantic energy that revamped the professional baseball recruiting process. The movie reportedly would’ve resembled something akin to Major League, only based more in reality and without Charlie Sheen (unfortunately).  But once Soderbergh got his hands on it, what was once a sure thing became a fakakta mess, so Pascal put the kibosh on the project.

brad pitt steven soderbergh1 Brad Pitt (Finally) Speaks About Moneyball

However, rumors are circulating that maybe it wasn’t Soderbergh and Pascal’s difference of opinion after all that caused Moneyball to strike out – maybe it was Pitt’s pits! You see, Brad Pitt is notorious for a few things: having nineteen visible abdominal muscles, liking “dahgs,” buying kids in six packs, being able to rock an outfit that would make the rest of us look like D.J. Qualls… and pulling out at the last minute (of projects, that is).

Let’s look at his track record, shall we? The actor dropped out of The Fountain, State of Play, and The Fighter in various degrees of last-minute scenarios.  So it wouldn’t be surprising to find that he once again suffered the morning-of jitters and decided to leave the bride at the alter, so to speak. Now mind you, this is all speculation based on a few whisperings here and there on the Interwebs, but still, it seems like a rumor worth considering.

Now consider this: new reports are surfacing that in fact, Pitt was whole-heartedly behind the project, and still is. Pitt was rocketed questions rapid-fire regarding Moneyball during a walk-by on a red carpet.  Granted, this isn’t the best time for an in-depth interview regarding the outlook of future projects, however The Playlist reports that Pitt spoke out about the project for the first time in public since the whole fiasco went down. When asked if he thinks Moneyball can recovered, or if it’s going the way of the dodo, Pitt responded with:

“My gut says yes. It’s a weird climate right now. But we’re still trying to re-mount it. I hope we get to do it soon.”

Wow, Pitt, you couldn’t be more vague if you were running for public office (consider that option, pal). But still, it’s something, right?  What’s more, Soderbergh is off the project, but Pitt, Sony, screenwriter Aaron Sorkin (who is writing a new draft of the script) and producers Mike DeLuca are still trying to keep the film alive and bring aboard a new director.

So whaddya think?  Will the American public dig a flick about baseball recruiting, starring Brad Pitt (especially if he doesn’t take his shirt off)?  Is there a large enough demographic that justifies making a movie about one dude and his strategies for picking players?  And, if you could choose, who would you get to direct Moneyball ? Does this film have what it takes to – here it comes – hit a home run?  ZING!

Source: The Playlist

TAGS: Moneyball
Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. It depends on the humor .
    And with Sorkin doing the rewrites Humor is what they are going for.

  2. this sounds like a dull movie to me but I’ve been wrong before ( well , actually I THOUGHT I was wrong once but I was mistaken ).

    Jacob , your use of the word fakakta made me laugh , so thank you for that (and the rest of the article was good too ).

    Fakakta………good word :)

  3. Brad Pitt has been doing this his whole career. What arrogance he has (and tremendous power) where he can allow months of prep to go on for projects that he walks away from just days before shooting. Costing studios lots of money.

    I remember the first such instance being back in 1999, when just two weeks before shooting, Pitt dropped out of “Almost Famous”, nearly killing that project before they delayed it a month and cast Billy Crudup.

    He did the same on “Dragonfly” in 2000. Plus, of course, “The Fountain”, “State of Play” and “The Fighter”, “The Bourne”-series as well, even “Marching to Valhalla” with Oliver Stone back in the late 90′s, but this makes you question why he didn’t feel that way when it came to crap like “Snatch” or “The Mexican” or “Ocean’s”-movies…

    Who knows. But it’s pretty impressive when most every other actor on the planet, if they were to drop out of projects last minute like this, would probably suffer career damage, Brad Pitt and his twelve pack abs, gets away scott free, every time.

    Only if you look like Brad Pitt, can you get away with it.

  4. I love Brad Pitt whatever movies he made I made a it a point to watch it and buy a dvd for my collection. He’s acting seem to be getting better every movie he made and I like that.

  5. i honestly dont care about Brad Pitt’s involvement, what I want to know more about is Steven Soderbergh vision for this movie. He is a stylistic director that has had my expectations high with Sex, Lies, And Videotape, Out Of Sight, Traffic (a movie I can watch over and over), and the Ocean trilogy.

    Full Frontal was horrible. Solarus was confusing and George Clooney’s worst movie since Batman & Robin.
    The Informant! with Matt Damon looks very different (I’m trying not to say stupid). I will have to give it a look when it comes out. But I’m just not sure Soderbergh is the right guy for a baseball movie

  6. @ allen: Solaris was ambiguous, sure, but not confusing. It wasn’t hard to come up with interpretations of the overall meaning, yet it was be difficult to decide upon which one is right. I thought it was a great flick, and enjoyed it more than the original Tartovsky version.

    Onto the topic, Brad Pitt can walk. Not that I’m glad to see him go, but a baseball movie doesn’t need such a high level actor to be successful. Baseball fans are gonna go see this even if Kevin Costner has to step up and extend his baseball movie appearance record further. Hopefully it’s not just baseball fans that check it out, but it is the fans themselves that will contribute most to the box office charts, and last time i checked, baseball people weren’t preoccupied with flash and sensation unless they come from the south side of Chicago :P