<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beowulf Comic-Con Unrated Trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/beowulf-comic-con-unrated-trailer-vic-920/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/beowulf-comic-con-unrated-trailer-vic-920/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:43:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/beowulf-comic-con-unrated-trailer-vic-920/comment-page-1/#comment-5550</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 04:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/beowulf-comic-con-unrated-trailer-920/#comment-5550</guid>
		<description>The script was originally R-rated filled with f-bombs and what not. But, they decided to go with a PG-13 instead.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The script was originally R-rated filled with f-bombs and what not. But, they decided to go with a PG-13 instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/beowulf-comic-con-unrated-trailer-vic-920/comment-page-1/#comment-5549</link>
		<dc:creator>Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/beowulf-comic-con-unrated-trailer-920/#comment-5549</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine them going for an R-rating on this.

Regarding the hype, come on... you know how it is on the web: Fanboys going nutso over any little peek at anything. :-)

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine them going for an R-rating on this.</p>
<p>Regarding the hype, come on&#8230; you know how it is on the web: Fanboys going nutso over any little peek at anything. <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip Chief</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/beowulf-comic-con-unrated-trailer-vic-920/comment-page-1/#comment-5548</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/beowulf-comic-con-unrated-trailer-920/#comment-5548</guid>
		<description>i dont get this whole &quot;unrated&quot; thing. there is like one frame of naked animated angelina, but it looks like there is mud or something on her kibbles and bits. mind you, i havent given the clip the whole frame by frame treatment that i am sure some have, but it seems like a lot of hype for a cartoon butt.

anyways, isnt this going to be PG-13? so musnt the footage be PG-13 or milder?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont get this whole &#8220;unrated&#8221; thing. there is like one frame of naked animated angelina, but it looks like there is mud or something on her kibbles and bits. mind you, i havent given the clip the whole frame by frame treatment that i am sure some have, but it seems like a lot of hype for a cartoon butt.</p>
<p>anyways, isnt this going to be PG-13? so musnt the footage be PG-13 or milder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

