Recent Related Items:

28 Comments


Stephen says:

Well I was excited about the news of the movie beginning filming next year, but if Nolan isn’t for sure on the project then I’d definitely be cool with it being held off another year or two to make sure he’s the main guy behind the camera.

Matt Keith says:

I agree. I would prefer it not to be rushed so it won’t end up like “Spiderman 3″ or X3. I was excited to her the news when it was first posted, but after a while I began to think it was just BS.

Gary says:

I am glad this was clarified.
Hopefully, Oldman will refrain from making such comments in the future.

The Critic says:

Weakkkkkkkkk!!!!!!!’
I wanted batman sooner rather than later.

Daniel F says:

I hate the argument that people use to defend this. A good batman is better than a crappy one. Well duh, but the point is we don’t know if it would be crappy if he did it right after inception. The only reason that argument gets made is to justify the amount of long time their taking. I can honestly say I don’t think the film would be crappy if they did it right after inception. If rushing a film auto makes it crappy there are a list of films that could be considered crappy , but were not or hell look at IM2 they rushed it pretty quick and it still came out good.

Daniel F says:

Meant to say and we still think it’s gonna come out good.

NDH says:

I’ll wait a couple extra years for Batman 3 if it means Nolan is in charge. I would also hope at this point that the studio realizes that you can make a lot more money with a quality Batman movie as opposed to a rushed Batman movie; the numbers speak for themselves.

I like Nolan “taking breaks” from the Bat universe, I think it keeps things fresh.

Joshi says:

@DanielF

“but were not or hell look at IM2 they rushed it pretty quick and it still came out good.”

Um, by IM2 I assume you mean Iron Man 2? In which case I ask… how do we know it’s good? Yes, it has a lot going for it, but as no one’s seen the full thing yet it’s not a foregone conclusion.

And plus, it is a very different beast from Batman and especially considering the circumstances surrounding TDK (Ledger’s Death) and how that affected Nolan as well as how that might affect any story ideas they had for the next film, I’d say a lot of work would need to go into the next Batman film for it to even match our expectations for it.

Remember, Oldman’s original statement was that shooting would start next year… not just production, but actual shooting. Nolan is the kind of guy who’d spend months writing the script first (along with his brother and Goyer) and then more months of planning, but if what Oldman said was true, he’d have to go straight from Inception to shooting a Batman script that he wouldn’t have a whole lot of input in. Compare that to Iron man where Faverau and the team went straight from one to the other with ideas in their head already of where it would go and a decent amount of time to work on a story and script and, well it’d be no surprise if this “rushed” Iron Man turned out good.

Hence, I’d much rather Nolan be given more time to consider his options and, if he does do the next film, be given more time to plan out a really amazing Batman movie. I know it sucks for us to have to wait, but at the end of the day, no one owes us a Batman film, WB are doing this for the money and have already stated they’re willing to wait for Nolan. Nolan, if he does do it, would be doing it for the movie and the fans (and the paycheck, because I’m not nearly that naive). But when you say something like “The only reason that argument gets made is to justify the amount of long time their taking.” it almost sounds as if you feel they’re obliged to give it to you and you dislike how long it’s taking them. Have a little patience.

Joshi says:

Wow, I really went off on one there didn’t I? Please all disregard my ranting, it looks like I’m in need of a good sleep.

Daniel F says:

Umm yea Joshi did you only read the one comment by me? I quickly corrected my self long before you commented about IM2. Would of been nice to fully read the comments before going in to a giant useless rant.

I would note he never said when it would start shooting it could of been the very end of the year which would actually give a handful of months before shooting.

BlackArrowX says:

Its a good idea that they take their time with the Batman franchise. I love Chris Nolan behind the lens. I would wait until they figure it all out.

Joshi says:

Daniel

I did read your second comment before writing mine, but I didn’t feel it fully negated the aspects of your previous comment that I addressed.

Anyway, the last thing I want now is for us to get into a heated argument about this so what say we just leave it be.

INK says:

Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!!

I don’t suppose you two are chicks?

Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!! Fight!!!

Fher says:

Iron Man is not in the same league as Batman. Iron Man can get away with being just a comic book film but we expect high art with Batman…so its better they do not rush the film so they can attempt to create a worthy story, script and film production.

INK says:

@Fher

Now you’ve done it. Look out …

Joshi says:

@Ink

I’m pretty sure it’s Daniel F and not Danielle F. ;)

And I’m a dude… last time I checked.

I should probably get that looked into again soon.

INK says:

Eh … figured as much.

Freakin’ dream smashers. :)

Joshi says:

I like to do what I can. ;)

D. Lewis says:

To the powers that be, when you cast for Batman 3, skip Johnny Depp for The Riddler. He’s ok, but I think Dennis Leary would be a better choice.

Matt Keith says:

I don’t even want The Riddler as the villian, but if I was to nominate someone to play him it would have to be David Tennant.

John "Kahless" Taylor says:

The Dark Knight sucked, so why even bother. Who wants to see a brooding billionaire who feels it’s his lot in life to take down all the criminals in his city. BORRRRINNNNG!!!

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Ok, I can’t even lie right. :-)

Take your time, Mr. Nolan, and give us a grand movie like your first 2.

Joshi says:

Anyone else thing David Tennant is over-rated?

Okay okay! It was just a joke!

But seriously, he’s going to have to do something extremely drastic to divorce himself from Dr Who in the minds of the public, else no matter what role people see him in, they’ll always think of him as the Doctor.

As for Batman’s next villain, I kind of hope they stay away from villains that have been used in movies before

Matt Keith says:

“As for Batman’s next villain, I kind of hope they stay away from villains that have been used in movies before”

Thats exactly what I want, use a villian that hasn’t been on screen before like Harly Quinn(not as the primary villian of course) and others.

Teron sorensen says:

hush anyone?

i will see batman 3 i will see eddie murphy as the riddler rachel weitz as catwoman marlon waynes as robin this will be exciting im glad eddie murphy is the riddler i like christain bale as batman i will see christain bale team up with marlon waynes as robin on the third batman movie so i will see batman 3 in theatres july 2011

Matt Keith says:

Andries,

Don’t forget Miley Cyrus as Batgirl(joking).

What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.