<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally, An Interesting Picture from &#8216;Avatar&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/avatar-picture-shows-niall-4982/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/avatar-picture-shows-niall-4982/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News without the Sugar Coating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:24:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Behind The Scenes Photos Of James Cameron’s Avatar - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/avatar-picture-shows-niall-4982/comment-page-1/#comment-82654</link>
		<dc:creator>Behind The Scenes Photos Of James Cameron’s Avatar - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4982#comment-82654</guid>
		<description>[...] few updates we have seen so far include a tag line for Avatar, an interesting set photo with Cameron and news of a toy line for the movie by Mattel that will hit shelves in October, two months before [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] few updates we have seen so far include a tag line for Avatar, an interesting set photo with Cameron and news of a toy line for the movie by Mattel that will hit shelves in October, two months before [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/avatar-picture-shows-niall-4982/comment-page-1/#comment-57886</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4982#comment-57886</guid>
		<description>And that depth of field thing is mainly affected by the aperture size they are using, but is more noticable in telephoto lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that depth of field thing is mainly affected by the aperture size they are using, but is more noticable in telephoto lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/avatar-picture-shows-niall-4982/comment-page-1/#comment-57759</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4982#comment-57759</guid>
		<description>Hm, a blend of CG and live sets. So that must mean the CG must be so good you can&#039;t tell when it goes from one to the other... That would be pretty sweet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, a blend of CG and live sets. So that must mean the CG must be so good you can&#8217;t tell when it goes from one to the other&#8230; That would be pretty sweet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVID GUIVANT</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/avatar-picture-shows-niall-4982/comment-page-1/#comment-57670</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVID GUIVANT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4982#comment-57670</guid>
		<description>Interesting photo.. I thought this movie was gonna be entirely in 3D, like beowulf? So there are some physical sets after all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting photo.. I thought this movie was gonna be entirely in 3D, like beowulf? So there are some physical sets after all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/avatar-picture-shows-niall-4982/comment-page-1/#comment-57495</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4982#comment-57495</guid>
		<description>That  object in front of Cameron,
Is that a biobed or some sort of high tech sarcophagus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That  object in front of Cameron,<br />
Is that a biobed or some sort of high tech sarcophagus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/avatar-picture-shows-niall-4982/comment-page-1/#comment-57484</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4982#comment-57484</guid>
		<description>Part of the photo is blurry because of depth of field--it&#039;s called short focus or shallow depth of field, common on film or video cameras, or still cameras, with long/telephoto(-ish) lenses.

I read at Ain&#039;t It Cool News that it may be the bed the humans lay in to jack into their avatars.

heath</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the photo is blurry because of depth of field&#8211;it&#8217;s called short focus or shallow depth of field, common on film or video cameras, or still cameras, with long/telephoto(-ish) lenses.</p>
<p>I read at Ain&#8217;t It Cool News that it may be the bed the humans lay in to jack into their avatars.</p>
<p>heath</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/avatar-picture-shows-niall-4982/comment-page-1/#comment-57483</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4982#comment-57483</guid>
		<description>An interesting picture. What we really need is a trailer to see if this will be a revolutionary film or just another star was prequel or star trek reboot. I&#039;m hoping Jim can pull a great original Sci-Fi epic. Show Hollywood that being original for once will workout for the better. Just wandering. Does this pic look photo shopped to anyone? The focus of the object going behind Jims head is blurry but he is&#039;nt. just looks strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting picture. What we really need is a trailer to see if this will be a revolutionary film or just another star was prequel or star trek reboot. I&#8217;m hoping Jim can pull a great original Sci-Fi epic. Show Hollywood that being original for once will workout for the better. Just wandering. Does this pic look photo shopped to anyone? The focus of the object going behind Jims head is blurry but he is&#8217;nt. just looks strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
