Related Posts:

17 Comments


Adrian said,
December 4th, 2007 

Niiiccceee!!! I approve!

Joel said,
December 4th, 2007 

If something like this can be done, then I am for it. Shoot, use this one!

KEL said,
December 4th, 2007 

Looks damn cool!! It’s the best Enterprize next to the original and the NCC-1701 A!! I hope the one used is something like this!!

Thanks for posting this,Vic! It was cool!

And that’s coming from a guy who’s more of a Star Wars freak than Trek,dude! ;-)

steve adams said,
December 4th, 2007 

I’m looking forward to seeing the trailer…
Hopefully that will answer some questions on the ship design.
^
This concept looks cool but not like the Original. The Original is fine and dosnt need a reboot. They should use the Enterprise from the Remasterd TOS version.
^
I think when all is said and done alot of us are going to say TOS didn’t need a reboot.
O well,they won’t take my calls.

Hirogen said,
December 5th, 2007 

That looks absolutely awesome! I definitely think that would be an acceptable design for the movie. Lets keep our fingers crossed that we do get something along those lines. I mean I do like the remastered TOS version as I had stated in another post, but I like how this version takes the same design and almost “real worlds’ it up” a bit.

December 5th, 2007 
Yeah, I really like this take on the design. I could do without the transparent areas on top of the nacelles though.

Vic

FlameStrike said,
December 5th, 2007 

I don’t like this one. This doesn’t look like a more detailed version of the original design, but like an entirely new design.

Changing the design of the original Enterprise will really distract me from the story in the movie, and can potentially ruin it for me.

Vic said,
December 5th, 2007 
Like I’ve said before, I’m glad I’m not the guy in charge of this movie. :-)
No pressure, eh?

Vic

Hirogen said,
December 5th, 2007 

That’s for damn sure. There is no way to make everyone happy. I guess they just do their best and hope to please the majority (HA!)

FlameStrike said,
December 6th, 2007 

The majority? That raises an interesting question: Can you please the majority of the people as a whole by alienating of the majority of your fanbase?

Based purely on my own experiences and what I’ve seen and heard, I’d say this movie may be trying to find that out.

steve adams said,
December 6th, 2007 

FlameStrike totally nailed it,,,this is the paradox Star Trek is in right now…
^
They can come up with 200 designs for the 1701 Enterprise but there’s really only one….and that’s the one the MAJORITY wants to see.
:FlameStrike totally nailed it,,,this is the paradox Star Trek is in right now…
^
They can come up with 200 designs for the 1701 Enterprise but there’s really only one….and that’s the one the MAJORITY wants to see.
:< ooo paah

There is no pressure until you start to compromise and that’s what their doing.
^
Forget the ship for one minute and think about how the acting has to be..
If its not perfect reguarding Pines and Quintos, kirk and spock it could border on comical.
“In my opinion” the actors have more to lose then Abrhams.

Jae Senn said,
December 10th, 2007 

Wow.. lovely.. But the transparent openings on top of the nacelles look like an attempt to bridge the old TOS warp nacelle design and the ST:TMP NCC-1701-C warp nacelles with the warm blue glow peeking out from louvers at the sides.

Maybe it’ll look better without the open areas altogether, or placed at the sides ala NCC-1701-C but in a way that flows with the design.

steve adams said,
December 10th, 2007 

I really think it would better if they would just leave it the way it should be.

Cody k said,
January 22nd, 2008 

it’s worth pointing out that Gabriel Koerner is the blonde teen who got so much airtime in the original “Trekkies” feature - the one who had a uniform made for him and was doing, even back then, some very sophisticated CGI on his personal computer.

Fleet Admiral SeanX said,
March 20th, 2008 

they should stick to the NCC-1701a design

Jeff said,
May 15th, 2008 

Anyone can be awed by CGI and special effects, but Star Trek has always been about more than that. If the story and acting in Star Trek XI doesn’t measure up to fans expectations, it’ll be just another big budget disaster.

Vestige said,
September 3rd, 2008 

I like everything about it except the see through panels in the nacelles. Why would you have that? It looks like it would be less protective thean the regular hull plating. Can you imagine a photon torpedo hitting that? It looks cool but this ain’t pimp my starship.

What's your opinion? Leave a comment!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have gotten caught in our trusty (but occasionally overly ambitious) spam filter. Please drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.