Related Posts:

5 Comments


David Poe said,
February 18th, 2005 

Maybe if they gave people time to actually care about the movies that are nominated. Not only is there the annoying habit of releasing Oscar-bait movies on the last few days of the year (and in limited run at that), people have all of two months to see the movie. Since I don’t limit my movie viewing to the dead of winter, where is the fun in that? Why should I watch an awards show for movies that only movie critics gush over?

I’ll probably check the news after they’re done to get the specifics. The Oscar’s are too self-important to care about spending 3+ hours on.

yetzirah said,
February 18th, 2005 

I will not be watching the Oscars. I haven’t cared about them in years.

Vic said,
February 18th, 2005 

Let me get this straight… Chris Rock hosting, and no delay??

LMAO!!! :lol:
I really believe that all this supposed controversy that’s been brought up via Rock’s comments is really a PR deal designed to get people to tune in to the show.

We used to be big fans of the Oscars, but with all the political soapbox stuff, seeing some awards given to obviously non-deserving nominees, etc., I really don’t know if we’ll tune in this year.

Eh, we probably will, but on a delay and we’ll Tivo through the commercials and annoying stuff.

Vic

Vic said,
February 19th, 2005 

I just read there will a five second time delay, which certainly makes sense considering the host. :shock:
Vic

Brian said,
February 20th, 2005 

I agree; that makes sense. Five seconds doesn’t seem like a lot, though…

Brian