Related Posts:

4 Comments


mediamelt said,
January 12th, 2005 

Hate to burst your bubble Vic, but they are double-dipping Spider-Man 2 as well :(
IMHO double-dipping is only ok if it is announced prior to the first dip. Like what New Line did with LOTR - announce the lite version as well as the extended version to arrive months later. This is the only fair way to do business. Anything else and the consumer feels cheated.

Vic said,
January 12th, 2005 

Wow, I’m not sure if that’s even WORSE. “Hey here are all these great versions to choose from, aren’t we nice?”

Then six months later they STILL come out with another version??

Yeesh. :confused:

Vic

yetzirah said,
January 13th, 2005 

:confused: I live with a spouse who is vulnerable to this marketing ploy. Grrr…. (not to the spouse, but to the marketers) Personally, I don’t care for alternate endings, behind the scenes, over anylizing crapola about movies. I just want to see the movie. It takes the magic out of it for me to see how they made the monster and it REALLY puts me off to see how much money they spent making the stupid monster. Just tell your story and go on with your life.
And get the heck out of my pocketbook…

Vic said,
January 13th, 2005 

The problem with the special features is you watch them once, and you’re done.

That’s why I’ve been curious about the Superbit format, but not enough to plunk down my cash for one of those DVDs. Especially with some of the odd choices they’ve made for titles they’ve made available in that format.

Vic