Related Posts:

4 Comments


Brian said,
September 1st, 2004 

Like the old saying goes, you can’t polish a turd.

The studio will always make it difficult for writers and directors to bring their true vision to the screen; it’s their job to play the game with the studios and reach a fair compromise. Anderson may indeed have had a stellar concept (although with his track record, I doubt it), but he can’t blame the studio for his failure, even if there was some meddling on the studio’s part. It’s the studio’s money; why shouldn’t they get a say in the matter? It was Anderson’s job to play “traffic cop” on his movie, and he blew it.

Even so, blaming others for your own screw-ups is a tried-and-true path to success in many walks of life, so Anderson seems to be ambitious, if nothing else.

Brian

Vic said,
September 1st, 2004 

The point of the linked article is that Anderson did not in fact have a “better” version. Blaming others is a game that in the end will bite one in the ass.

Vic

TRENT said,
May 4th, 2005 

Can anyone please tell me what hybrid films in the past have worked? AVP, Freddy v.s Jason, all highly-anticipated busts. It’s just a marketing tool and a bad one at that.

May 4th, 2005 
Yup, combining two franchises is usually about hype. It’s been done for YEARS in the comic book industry but it’s a much more expensive (and riskier) proposition to do it on the big screen.

I actually kind of liked F vs. J up until that stupid cop-out ending. I also would have loved to have seen the much talked about but destined to never be made Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash (from the “Evil Dead” series). :D
Vic