Comments on: Angelina Jolie Back (from the dead) For Wanted 2

By: Jolie Leaves Wanted 2 For ‘Gravity’ - Screen Rant

Jolie Leaves Wanted 2 For ‘Gravity’ - Screen Rant — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:16:15 +0000

[...] Leaves Wanted 2 For ‘Gravity’Back at the start of summer ‘09 we got word that Angelina Jolie would be returning for Wanted 2 – [SPOILER ALERT!!!] even though her character in film, Fox, ended up having her brains blown [...]

By: antonis

antonis — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:14:53 +0000

i like angelina jolie she is very very very very very verybeautiful she is the next top beautiful women!!!!!!

By: antonis

antonis — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:14:53 +0000

i like angelina jolie she is very very very very very verybeautiful she is the next top beautiful women!!!!!!

By: eli

eli — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:46:08 +0000

hi angelina,i love u

By: pt hnry

pt hnry — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:41:11 +0000

—Long rich and pushing 50 —let’s hope Brangelina
starts showing some real nerve by speaking out about
Hollywood and media’s suck-up relations with the most awesomely genocidal regime in history —across the Pacific!

That’s 70 million murdered —in ‘peacetime’.

That’s right…

NOW —enjoy your circle-jerk fantasies —cause people
are dying for them —by the tens of millions.
ABSOLUTE FACT

By: hamany

hamany — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:21:44 +0000

waaaaaaaaaaaaw nice and cute photo

By: Wanted 2 Director Talks Resurrecting Angelina Jolie - Screen Rant

Wanted 2 Director Talks Resurrecting Angelina Jolie - Screen Rant — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:51:32 +0000

[...] we recently reported on the rumor that Angelina Jolie is returning for Wanted 2, even though her character, Fox, [SPOILER ALERT!] was on the receiving end of a bullet to the head [...]

By: SIN187UM

SIN187UM — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:05:22 +0000

Yawn at Wanted the Movie, Wanted the game, and 2 yawns for this crap sequel. AJ is over rated as far as looks goes.

By: J. Morell

J. Morell — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 01:01:31 +0000

And with regards to those clamoring for Megan Fox, I’ll thank you to keep her out of proper cinema, please. It is one thing for them to put Angelina in a part that’s a little overly sexually exploitative (not as bad as some of her other movies), but at the very least you can’t say she didn’t do a good acting job. Jolie is a fantastic actress and Megan Fox is a TERRIBLE actress without a drop of acting talent in her tiny body, simple as that. If none of her earlier performances could convince you of that, I think you need look no more recent than Transformers 2 (an appropriately atrocious movie for an atrocious actress), in which I think Michael Bay realized just how useless Megan Fox really was. Her part in that movie is so minimal, and she does so little that I don’t think anyone could argue that she was anything more than eye-candy, but frankly that’s about the extent of her talent. I’m tired of seeing her in movies. Jolie is a seasoned actress and hasn’t lost any of her physical or emotional charm, I doubt they’ll be able to appropriately convince me of how she survived a bullet to the head, but I will, as always, look forward to her performance.

By: J. Morell

J. Morell — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:23:42 +0000

The first movie was entertaining and though only fairly acted and certainly badly executed, the effects were well done and no matter how I felt about it I couldn’t get enough over-the-top-launching-cars-into-the-air-to-crash-into-another-vehicle action and it didn’t leave me without a few redeeming qualities. A sequel seems like a bit of a bad idea, since I have this image of my head of something like the unfortunate Underworld sequels which failed to bring back any of the magic from the first one, but that doesn’t mean it’s impossible. As far as bringing Jolie back though, I can’t blame them for wanting to keep the most popular character in the series (and probably the best actor sans Morgan Freeman), especially since I KNOW people that only saw it to see Angelina naked. I think the movie has just enough unbelievable-WTF-AWESOME type choreography to figure out a way for Fox to survive a gunshot to the brain and I’m fairly certain I’ll watch this sequel regardless (if not just to see what else they can do with guns and cars).

By: attaboy

attaboy — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:31:20 +0000

fox made wanted interesting without fox the movie with that guy (the lead) would be dry!!! bring fox back but do it with BRAINS

By: jetaa!

jetaa! — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:49:47 +0000

u are the best woman in the world….u have a beautiful eyes and brat pitt (u’re husband)is pretty too.just go ahed angelina really u are the angel.you have an face that is very cute. i like u’re film MR. and MR.SMITH, you were very hot there…byee angel from KOSOVA i love youuuu ..and u’re husband…(l)

By: LikeItMuch?

LikeItMuch? — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:34:36 +0000

I reckon the story for it is gonna be stupid or have so many flaws

By: EdCarden

EdCarden — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:09:17 +0000

Wanted 2 could be done easily and include a character that dies at the end of the first film.

Can you say Prequal?

In fact I believe a prequal would be a better approach then an actual sequel (chronologically speaking) since the best and hottest (and I emphasis HOTTEST) characters dies in the first. Plus it would allow for more exploration of the Fraternity which at the end of the first movie was for the most part disbanded.

Whats key is to get a good writer and not focus simply on effects. Sadly though what makes a great grphic novel (story wise) doe snot always tranlslate well to the big screen.

By: John "Kahless" Taylor

John "Kahless" Taylor — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:38:45 +0000

@Xan
Isn’t that being politically incorrect? Shouldn’t it be developmentally disabled? Oh wait, that’s what the first movie was.

By: Xan

Xan — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:26:58 +0000

Correct me if im wrong but didn’t she pretty much shoot herself in the head in the first one? The only way i’ll be ok with her being in a second is if it’s a prequel or she’s stone cold retarded from missing most of her brain.

By: Ken X

Ken X — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:55:46 +0000

Personally i love the tatts, but i thought she looked great overall. I wouldnt mind them sticking with the storyline of the first and leaving her dead…if they replaced her with megan fox. I hate when they bring people back from the dead. or change characters actors but keep the character, so im not a fan of that idea.

By: greenknight333

greenknight333 — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:31:35 +0000

Liked the first movie but I didn’t go in expecting anything with a strong story…lots of mindless action..besides it was based on a Mark Millar work and Millar is the most overrated guy in comics right now…but wait wasn’t he supposed to save the Superman franchise with his brilliant three movie story arc? **Sarcasm**

By: TJ

TJ — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:03:56 +0000

I thought there was nothing wrong with the first. Just harmles fun. I’ll be up for a second one, and if Angelina is in it, I wouldn’t mind either

By: tasouli

tasouli — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:12:07 +0000

i dont find jolie to be good looking personally (big lips, tatoos, broad manly shoulders) but her weight was fine in the movie, any people that are complaining about her being too skinny are probably self counscious about their own appearance..
leave jolie dead, bring in megan fox amen