With Seth Graham-Smith's literary mash-up Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter finally telling the "true story" behind one of America's most iconic presidents, we decided to see what other unique stories were out there – and what crazy secrets they revealed about history's (and literature's) famed faces.
From dead dwarves, zombies and werewolves to androids, these 30(!) literary mash-ups put a new twist on familiar stories. If you think Abraham Lincoln is dangerous with a hatchet, just wait until you see what Queen Victoria can do with with her royal axe.
So let's kick things off with another literary mash-up from Graham-Smith...
I think he meant for a movie genre. Kind of live Found-Footage type films becoming it’s own genre. I must agree with him too, if this becomes a genre I will slap myself every time a “Literary Mash-Up” is released. It’s still overly ridiculous in books, why can’t people make their own stories and ideas about werewolves, vampires, monsters, and zombies? I’m afraid this world lacks great creative minds in authors now.
I doubt it’s fair to lump all authors in with a niche market. There have always been quick-to-cash genres, we’ve just happened onto a time when writers from one facet of entertainment are looking for easy inspiration from another facet. Unfortunately the latter has taken easy inspiration from history. The National Treasure films have done something similar, except they’ve gone the Disney family route as opposed to the horror genre route. It’s no different than Michael Bay’s opening for Transformers: Dark of the Moon or Apollo 18. This trend has been happening for a while now. For better or worse.
Just reading the descriptions and going through them made me bored. A lot of unoriginal and repeated themes throughout all of them. Granted I read ALVH and will probably see the movie but there is such a thing as going over board with something. *cough re-boots, prequels, sequels, spin-offs, etc.
This is already a thing. It’s all over fiction. You can’t move in the fantasy section without bumping into a werewolf or vampire or zombie or fairy. Hell, you can’t even in the Romance section.
Unique ideas are dead. We should mourn them. After we’re done killing the zombies…
Jasper Fforde’s novel here and the series he wrote in continuation from it are excellent. The Rapunzel story is pretty entertaining, as is the “Three Wise Men”. Most of these others are derivative crap.
Even though it’s different because it doesn’t tie into one single novel I really enjoyed Anno Dracula. It wove elements from Sherlock Holmes, Bram Stokers Dracula, and real life events like Jack the Ripper into a plot about vampires. It’s a fun read and would be great to see on screen…
Wow most of these are women writers.
So Im gonna start calling for equal rights for us overlooked Dogs in the world of
Mash-Ups Crazy Writing(for better or Worse then) Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter’
What’s interesting about this trend to me is that these titles are little more than glorified fan fiction. When a writer is attempting to establish a footing as an author, fan fiction is an easy tool. Mind you, the majority of professionals will frown upon fan-fic and discourage ‘serious’ writers to stray from it to focus on original characters. I’m not sure what years these books were written in, but it seems to go hand-in-hand with the craze we’ve seen in Hollywood and the comic book industry to reinvent someone else’s legend for a) one’s own fortune and/or b) one’s own success.
The trend is a bit of a “face-palm” to those of us who put the effort into creating original works and characters. The reverse side of the coin, however, is that whatever stimulates someone to read a book is a good thing.
Research some of the authors –
Seth Graham-Smith (Greenberg)
Ben H Winters
Paul A. Freeman
A E Moorat
Kevin Postupack
Porter Grand
Adam Roberts
- substitute “manipulation” for “mash-up” and ask yourself:
Why are these books being written?
Who is writing them?
These efforts are very creative – what is the agenda?
i dont need to research these authors, all it takes is a tiny bit of common sense to understand what is going on here.
Why are these books being written?
-quick cash grab on a fickle trend
Who is writing them?
-authors that lack the creativity to create something relatively original. i do understand that there is no such thing as ‘absolutely original creation’ in writing, and that all works are derivatives but this is ridiculous.
These efforts are very creative
-no they are not.
what is their agenda?
-Quick. Cash. Grab. On. A. Trend.
like i said earlier. it wouldn’t be so bothersome if they at least tried new things with this trend. but no. its just:
someone else’s classic work + vampires/werewolves/zombies
that is an embarassing lack of creativity even for an already creativity-deficient trend
I’ve not taken the time to read much steampunk but I’ve seen a few intriguing designs. I’m sure as a designer you have your own thoughts/feelings but I’m all for seeing people create.
That nugget of conjecture you refer to as common sense, (or maybe a
no-brainer)is the fragile logic you’ve been programmed to accept by the people who sell you things. If you believe the motivation for a corporate owned publishing house to release “literary mash-ups of someone else’s classic work” is merely a “quick grab for cash”, you might want to actually read some of the Western Canon of literature, written by generations of original thinkers who wouldn’t accept false propaganda by the powers that be.
Those wordings and that tedious sentence structuring doesn’t make you seem clever, it makes you seem like a hopeless n00b trying to cover up the fact that you have to real defense for this trend.
I am not even sure if you fully understand what we are arguing about.
I said before “all works are derivative”. I admitted that you cannot truly ‘create’ something, it needs to be derived from something you already know. However, what is happening here is monkey-see-monkey-do. I will not elaborate it all over again because you are too lazy to read my previous response.
Next time you want to engage in an argument, actually have an argument.
None of them. I really don’t want this to be a thing now.
Nichtus,
With (more than) 30 of them out there, I’m afraid it’s already “a thing.”
Vic
I think he meant for a movie genre. Kind of live Found-Footage type films becoming it’s own genre. I must agree with him too, if this becomes a genre I will slap myself every time a “Literary Mash-Up” is released. It’s still overly ridiculous in books, why can’t people make their own stories and ideas about werewolves, vampires, monsters, and zombies? I’m afraid this world lacks great creative minds in authors now.
I doubt it’s fair to lump all authors in with a niche market. There have always been quick-to-cash genres, we’ve just happened onto a time when writers from one facet of entertainment are looking for easy inspiration from another facet. Unfortunately the latter has taken easy inspiration from history. The National Treasure films have done something similar, except they’ve gone the Disney family route as opposed to the horror genre route. It’s no different than Michael Bay’s opening for Transformers: Dark of the Moon or Apollo 18. This trend has been happening for a while now. For better or worse.
Just reading the descriptions and going through them made me bored. A lot of unoriginal and repeated themes throughout all of them. Granted I read ALVH and will probably see the movie but there is such a thing as going over board with something. *cough re-boots, prequels, sequels, spin-offs, etc.
This is already a thing. It’s all over fiction. You can’t move in the fantasy section without bumping into a werewolf or vampire or zombie or fairy. Hell, you can’t even in the Romance section.
Unique ideas are dead. We should mourn them. After we’re done killing the zombies…
Jasper Fforde’s novel here and the series he wrote in continuation from it are excellent. The Rapunzel story is pretty entertaining, as is the “Three Wise Men”. Most of these others are derivative crap.
Even though it’s different because it doesn’t tie into one single novel I really enjoyed Anno Dracula. It wove elements from Sherlock Holmes, Bram Stokers Dracula, and real life events like Jack the Ripper into a plot about vampires. It’s a fun read and would be great to see on screen…
Robin Hood&Friar Tuck:Zombie Killers would be a great graphic novel. I wish I would’ve thought of that I’d be writing right now.
I would actually sort of be morbidly curious to see Betty White in Queen Victoria: Demon Hunter
I kinda wuldnt mind scrooge..jus cuz i hate it so much…zombies wuld b an interesting twist
The only one that sounds even halfway interesting is Romeo& Juliet& Vampires.
Wow most of these are women writers.
So Im gonna start calling for equal rights for us overlooked Dogs in the world of
Mash-Ups Crazy Writing(for better or Worse then) Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter’
Send your story’s to WGivesAF@wrongwayvilleArK.
Unholy Night sounds like it could be really awesome, now I just need to find the book.
What’s interesting about this trend to me is that these titles are little more than glorified fan fiction. When a writer is attempting to establish a footing as an author, fan fiction is an easy tool. Mind you, the majority of professionals will frown upon fan-fic and discourage ‘serious’ writers to stray from it to focus on original characters. I’m not sure what years these books were written in, but it seems to go hand-in-hand with the craze we’ve seen in Hollywood and the comic book industry to reinvent someone else’s legend for a) one’s own fortune and/or b) one’s own success.
The trend is a bit of a “face-palm” to those of us who put the effort into creating original works and characters. The reverse side of the coin, however, is that whatever stimulates someone to read a book is a good thing.
Pope Galileo Galilei.
the lack of creativity in this creativity-lacking-trend is astonishing.
vampires, werewolves, vampires, zombies, vampires, vampires, werewolves, demons, vampires.
ugh.
What about ghouls?
Research some of the authors –
Seth Graham-Smith (Greenberg)
Ben H Winters
Paul A. Freeman
A E Moorat
Kevin Postupack
Porter Grand
Adam Roberts
- substitute “manipulation” for “mash-up” and ask yourself:
Why are these books being written?
Who is writing them?
These efforts are very creative – what is the agenda?
i dont need to research these authors, all it takes is a tiny bit of common sense to understand what is going on here.
Why are these books being written?
-quick cash grab on a fickle trend
Who is writing them?
-authors that lack the creativity to create something relatively original. i do understand that there is no such thing as ‘absolutely original creation’ in writing, and that all works are derivatives but this is ridiculous.
These efforts are very creative
-no they are not.
what is their agenda?
-Quick. Cash. Grab. On. A. Trend.
like i said earlier. it wouldn’t be so bothersome if they at least tried new things with this trend. but no. its just:
someone else’s classic work + vampires/werewolves/zombies
that is an embarassing lack of creativity even for an already creativity-deficient trend
Oh steampunk is the worst however I love the list…
I’ve not taken the time to read much steampunk but I’ve seen a few intriguing designs. I’m sure as a designer you have your own thoughts/feelings but I’m all for seeing people create.
That nugget of conjecture you refer to as common sense, (or maybe a
no-brainer)is the fragile logic you’ve been programmed to accept by the people who sell you things. If you believe the motivation for a corporate owned publishing house to release “literary mash-ups of someone else’s classic work” is merely a “quick grab for cash”, you might want to actually read some of the Western Canon of literature, written by generations of original thinkers who wouldn’t accept false propaganda by the powers that be.
Those wordings and that tedious sentence structuring doesn’t make you seem clever, it makes you seem like a hopeless n00b trying to cover up the fact that you have to real defense for this trend.
I am not even sure if you fully understand what we are arguing about.
I said before “all works are derivative”. I admitted that you cannot truly ‘create’ something, it needs to be derived from something you already know. However, what is happening here is monkey-see-monkey-do. I will not elaborate it all over again because you are too lazy to read my previous response.
Next time you want to engage in an argument, actually have an argument.
ugh. shut up you two.
Ajanta, forget westernlit. He’s a pretentious d.ouche who thinks he’s living in the matrix and does his best morpheus impression whenever he can.
westernlit, forget Ajanta. He’ll ‘die for his ship’ like I know you will.
These books mostly suck though. The Rapunzel one looks like it might be decent.
Some of the lamest stuff I have ever seen.
I thought these were all a joke, until I googled a few.
Ugh, how publishing has fallen.
lol, you weren’t the only one googling these to find, to much horror, that these books are real.
You forgot the great American classic The Late Gatsby (gatsby/vampire mash-up)
Queen Victoria Demon Hunter seems like fun!
Just get a great 18 year old Actress to do it…
Choloe Moretz would be a good one… She is at the right age and all she needs is a dialogue coach!