Comments on: Saw VI Update: Can You Handle 9 Saws?

By: Paranormal Activity Trailer & Poster (Do Not Watch Alone) - Screen Rant

Paranormal Activity Trailer & Poster (Do Not Watch Alone) - Screen Rant — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:58:35 +0000

[...] other than buckets of blood and gore. With this current horror era of torture-porn (I think the Saw series is up to about number 26 by now…), it’s great to see a movie like this celebrate the creepy, get-under-your-skin horror [...]

By: Saw VI Teaser & First Clip, Saw VII On The Way - Screen Rant

Saw VI Teaser & First Clip, Saw VII On The Way - Screen Rant — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:21:19 +0000

[...] shape), Saw will see it’s sixth installment hit theaters this October, and now we learn that the rumors we previously reported are now confirmed: Saw VII has been greenlit and is on the [...]

By: Foopher

Foopher — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:32:06 +0000

As long as the plots stay as amazing as they have been for the past 5 movies, they can make 22 movies for all i care

By: Johnathan

Johnathan — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:21:08 +0000

Okay I love SAW I look forward to them and they are up in my favs in the horror catagory…however 9 SAW movies may be a little much. I seriously pray they end it with this 6th installment and conclude it well…I don’t wanna be left hanging this time =p I want for everything to come full circle and leave us SAW fans happy with the outcome. There is something called too much of a good thing ya know ;p

By: Kenny

Kenny — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:05:42 +0000

Hoffman would of wanted to bring Dr. Gordon back

By: Aaron

Aaron — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:38:39 +0000

*do

By: Aaron

Aaron — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:38:14 +0000

I honestly love the Saw movies and can’t wait for the 6th installment to the series.

I am wondering what Hoffman will no next.

By: 790

790 — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:51:02 +0000

Kahless, the Saw saga is a mess of flash backs and assistants that do Jigsaw’s work for him…

Its pretty far fetched.

By: John "Kahless" Taylor

John "Kahless" Taylor — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:00:33 +0000

Welllllll! How is this guy still killing people if he’s dead?

By: Weekly Film News (’Saw’ 9, ‘Spawn’ & Leo, Megan Fox) | The Film Nest

Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:33:09 +0000

[...] are possible plans for 9 Saw films, which would possibly have them hacking away through 2012 here. [Screenrant] A bit long in the tooth past film 3 or so in my [...]

By: 790

790 — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:40:36 +0000

@Foopher, (imo) torture porn refers to the desire to see people tortured in cinematical films, Hostel, Saw, etc.
(Last time I checked) it doesn’t refer really to nudity.
^
And yeah I’ve seen the first 4 films.
I thought the first film was a pretty good horror film but the subsequent films seemed to dwell more on gore and torture. Especally the 3rd film. The 4th film kept jumping between time lines so much that I couldn’t tell what was going on, and didn’t really care anyway.

By: Longshanks

Longshanks — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:38:28 +0000

I personally like the series except for the first film,but in a strange way,the other four films actually make it better to me.

I find it funny that people keep complaining about these movies.This is probably the only horror franchise that every single film directly ties into the other ones in some sort of way.

I’m not looking for some sort of social commentary when I watch these movies,so the gross out factor and the traps are pretty much what I expect to see,and they have more than delivered.If you can sit and watch the guy in “the wrack” from the 3rd movie and not cringe when you see it,then I just don’t think you’re human.

I’m always entertained by these movies,and that’s about all I really care about when I go to see them,or any other movie for that matter.

By: Foopher

Foopher — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:24:31 +0000

the traps are genius and beautiful in a sick, twisted way. it takes a certain type of genius to come up with new ways to tear people apart. (not a genius i’d like to meet but still)

By: Foopher

Foopher — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:22:07 +0000

torture porn? have you seen the movies? there’s boobs for like 2 seconds in the 3rd one

By: dudelove

dudelove — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:30:26 +0000

I like the first two. I’ve seen 3 and 4, I have no interest in seeing any more. I’ll stick to reading the wikipedia entries until something interesting happens.

By: Underdog007

Underdog007 — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:19:07 +0000

I like them all personally. The fact they do come out with one every year is my favorite part. It’s now become tradition to check out the new Saw and watch all the others in a row Halloween night. Would that make me somewhat sick?? Probably so!

By: Iron Knight

Iron Knight — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:40:47 +0000

Man, this is the perfect example of **unneccesary** sequels out of a movie. The worst thing is that they rushed them so as to get one released every year. Although that’s impressive, I wonder if they’ll be crazy enough to make two per year in the future. Prepare for 2015, when Saw 20 gets released!!!

By: 790

790 — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:53:54 +0000

You should see how many copies of Saw films are inhabit the 99cent bin at my local used cd/dvd store.

When does terror become terrorism, when were talking about Saw 9 that’s when.
There must be a scandal to overlook hey its time for another Tobinladin tape to surface,,,

I’m so sick of torture porn. Those ads are vile.

By: Stephen

Stephen — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:45:30 +0000

The only good one was the first IMO, the two three after that were alright, but Saw V was horrible.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:41:12 +0000

should have stopped at 3