2012 Review

Published 5 years ago by

Short Version: If you’re looking for some wicked-cool visuals and destruction on a scale that even Emmerich has never put on screen before, then 2012 is for you. Plot and character development? Move along, nothing to see here.

2012 airplane 2012 Review
Screen Rant reviews 2012

That picture right there? That’s why you go see 2012. Heck, lately that’s why you go see any Roland Emmerich film – destruction on a massive scale. The man has taken what Irwin Allen used to do and multiplied it by 100.

2012 actually starts in 2009 – well first it starts out in space, showing us a few different shots of our solar system and the planets lining up all in a row, with the sun at the end of that line. When we get to good old Earth, we’re in India where geologist Adrian Helmsley (Chiwetel Ejiofor, the assassin from Serenity) is meeting a fellow scientist at the Institute of Astrophysics. They go 11,000 feet down into a copper mine where it seems they figure they may as well do some scientific research as long as they’re down there.

Anyway, they have tracked a series of the biggest solar flares in history taking place over the last week, and it seems that they’re putting out some different type of neutrino that instead of just passing through the earth is interacting with the core, causing it to heat up to temperatures far exceeding normal. At this point I’m thinking “OK, OK, that’s not bad, I can buy that.”

Helmsley travels to Washington D.C. where he convinces high ranking Washington muckity-muck Carl Anheuser (a very rotund Oliver Platt) the importance of what he’s found. We jump forward to 2010 where the president (Danny Glover – seriously) is addressing European heads of state about the impending end of the world. Another jump to 2011 where it becomes apparant that some sort of stealth operations are taking place to insure the safety of works of art, wealthy and powerful people and presumably other odds and ends.

In the meantime we meet Jackson Curtis (John Cusack), a divorced dad and not very successful author who drives a limo for a living. While his young daughter still has eyes only for daddy, his slightly older son is a much bigger fan of mom’s live-in boyfriend (kids live with mom and her boyfriend – nice move, mom). Taking the kids camping to Yellowstone, he runs into a cordoned off military area where significant changes are happening geologically. It’s here we meet Woody Harrelson as a quasi-nutjob/free-spirit who seems to know what’s going on and fills Jackson in, including the plans for the world’s elite to escape the destruction in spaceships. Of course Cusack doesn’t believe him and heads on his merry way.

It doesn’t take long however for a series of increasingly strong and frequent earthquakes (along with some other things) to convince Jackson that the crazy guy isn’t crazy after all, and he grabs the ex-wife, kids and new boyfriend just in the nick of time in the scene we’ve all watched in trailers and TV commercials.

From here on, all hell breaks out everywhere, and watching it all happen is the whole reason for going to see this movie.

Jackson is determined to save his family, and his journey to find one of these “arks” grows more implausible with every passing scene. Thankfully director Emmerich spreads the destruction out throughout the entire film – so if you’re concerned that you’ll have already seen the best stuff in the trailer, fear not… that was just a taste. I found it interesting that they showed a number of landmarks being destroyed including the Vatican and the famous statue of Christ on a Brazil mountaintop – but although they showed the Kabaa in one scene he did not portray its destruction. I’ve heard that he didn’t show it destroyed due to fear of retribution.

Anyway, the destruction throughout the film was quite well done – I especially liked the scene at Yellowstone… VERY impressive. And of course the expanded version of the destruction of California was well done (and strangely satisfying… I kid, I kid). The arks were quite cool as well, although the MacGuffin that caused the “suspense” at the end was quite ridiculous.

There’s a a fair amount of ridiculousness in 2012, but really, what does one expect going into a film like this? In the end I enjoyed the visual effects and Chiwetel Ejiofor, who I think has a real screen presence about him. Woody Harrelson? Brief appearance but memorable. John Cusack seemed to me like a fish out of water here – like he just really didn’t belong. Thandie Newton was little more than eye candy (although she was supposed to be more). Oh, and Danny Glover as the President of the United States? LOL funny – I think the poor guy left any acting ability he may have had down in Venezuela.

Towards the end of the film it really fell apart as Emmerich tried to inject some emotion into the film. A big contributing factor was the cheesy music in the emotional scene – the whole thing felt like it was out of a made for TV movie. It might have actually worked better had he not tried to “make” us FEEL the emotion via the cliche’d music and maybe trusted the actors to make it happen. If only he could figure out a way to make a film that didn’t require actual people (you know, other than the ones who need to die for the destruction to mean something).

So if you’re looking for much in the way of plot or character development, move along, nothing to see here. But if you’re looking for some wicked-cool visuals and destruction on a scale that even Emmerich has never put on screen before, then 2012 may be the movie for you.

Our Rating:

2.5 out of 5
(Fairly Good)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Worst movie i have seen since a very long time. It is so stupid that even a japanese cartoon director would have refused to do it. James Bond has really possible scenarios compared to this one. I actually saw a 12 YO kid tell his mother that he is bored and that he wants to go home.

  2. it was a very good movie..but the ending was not all that good…the last 30 minutes of the film should had been taken out. after the plane crashes in the snow and the cars fly out, they should have cut to the arks as they were was leaving the docks.

  3. This movie was a great action/family movie (not little kids) in many ways. If you want a CGI/action movie go see it. Personally, CGI, in many films sucks and I hate it. I tolerate it so that I can be taken to a new place so I let it’s cheesy/fakeness slide a bit. The CGI in this film was awesome in some spots, notably Yellowstone. It is however, not the movie I was hoping to see. There are many different sources that indicate 2012 as the final year – other than the Mayans. The movie barely mentions the REASON for concern about 2012. Call me crazy but If you’re writing a movie about a Mayans prediction wouldn’t you maybe include a little piece in the movie set back in the Mayan time era to maybe speculate what they were talking about?. ZERO story to dig into WHY the 2012 concern and a details other than a quick cartoon representation like we saw in Jurassic Park for the dinasour “process”. Hollywood couldn’t have given a crap about the 2012 story itself – it was used as a teaser to pull you into another CGI action orgy – a damn good one I might add but the movie could have been called 2045 or how bout 3084. Nice action. Terrible telling of 2012 story.

  4. I agree with you on Independence Day, and Day After… This movie I would give a 5.5 to, maybe a 6. Now Story was weak but DID exist; like any other SFx movie. That said (and I like Danny Glover but here he was out of place) the acting was pretty good. What really earns the stars here is some of the BEST effects EVER, anywhere! Breathtaking visuals. I will not pick apart some of the physics as this of course would ruin the enjoyment. All in all my son and I LOVED this movie.

  5. Yeah I liked the way you separated the rating.. I AGREE.. And for this site (and I am a FIRST time visit right now (plus my post a minute ago).)

    For this site, it should have ratings for the various areas.

    Acting 4 – 10
    Plot (ie: Quality of story subject / idea) 7 – 10
    Story Depth 3.5 – 10
    Visuals / sfx 10 – 10

    Overall 5.6

  6. i sean about half of it and its pretty awesome, so i don't know why some over critical people are putting a bad name on it!

    • hahaha you only could stomach half of it it was so lame LOLOLOL

  7. this movie rocks, its awesome, so i don't know why over critical people have to ruin it!

  8. cool! =]

  9. cool! =]

  10. I didn't think it wasnt that bad. The plot wasn't that bad either, I don't think its cheesy, I don't think nothings wrong with this movie, I think this revie is KINDA pointless. Besides the destruction, I think Jackson was TOO lucky, but they did had Gordon die while inside the ships. I would rated this movie 7.5/10 But I do agree the plot is kinda bad.

  11. Have any of you guys noticed during the scene when the 4 Asians and the family of the guy were trapped in the ship while water level was getting higher, the water wasn't swinging inside the ship although it was shown that the ship was swinging (outside view) back and forth and side to side due to the heavy waves?

  12. A massive thumbs down. Was not what I expected. Sure it’s got special effects and action, but it lacks a valid story line. Come on, you’ve got the rapture in it. So a group of scientists/archeologists attempt to put a crucifix back in the place it was taken, meanwhile a virgin is about to give birth. A man flys through a thunderstorm to rescue his daughter. An atheist suddenly sees a pyramid on the TV then remembers something about a dream etc, then drives to it in the middle of massive storms. I really don’t get it! There was no Nibiru, or rogue planets to threaten earth, just the galactic alignment. If people believe this pile of nonsense, they will gobble up the Nibiru BS

  13. wie kann ich schnell abnehmen
    For the reason that the admin of this web page
    is working, no doubt very shortly it will be well-known, due to its quality contents.
    wie kann ich schnell abnehmen

  14. I have read so many articles or reviews about the blogger lovers however this article is actually a good piece of writing, keep it up.

  15. WOW just what I was searching for. Came here
    by searching for prace magisterskie tematy

  16. You need to post content that is applicable to them and focus your efforts in ways that keep their attention.

  17. It is what they want and what you need.

  18. Use this article to learn what you need to know about marketing your site on these platforms.

  19. Hi there it’s me, I am also visiting this web site
    daily, this website is in fact nice and the users are really sharing good thoughts.